UnforcedTerror
Hall of Fame
Tricky match for Nole. First time they play each other.
Vote and discuss.
Vote and discuss.
Lovely weather this time of year.Vote and discuss.
Not tricky at all. Straight sets.Tricky match for Nole. First time they play each other.
Vote and discuss.
The pressure of playing Jordan Thompson might be unbearable.It all depends on how Djokovic deals with pressure
Fun fact: Jordan Thompson has played the most grass matches of any player (either ATP or WTA) in 2023 - 14 - including a final in Hertogenbosch.
He has a good serve and likes to slice the BH a lot, he’s (as much as it is possible these days) a classically styled Aussie grass player.
I quite like this as a 2nd round matchup, he won’t just roll over for Djokovic.
Damn this is a hell of an SnV performance from Thompson, as I predicted.
He’s channeling Peak Rafter.
Don’t know why they gave up on SnV. Djokovic is clearly flummoxed.
Kral in a nutshellNever mind he just got broken with an atrocious volley
Great forecasting and in depth knowledge of the game as usualKral in a nutshell
Keep hyping up Novak's opponents.Damn this is a hell of an SnV performance from Thompson, as I predicted.
He’s channeling Peak Rafter.
Don’t know why they gave up on SnV. Djokovic is clearly flummoxed.
That one was trolling to be fair.Keep hyping up Novak's opponents.
I wonder how Djokovic could handle an actual SnVer like Rafter. He dismantled Thompson’s serve in that one game but JT also duffed a couple easy volleys too, before that Thompson was actually causing him some problems, playing good attacking stuff.Jordan may get routined, but his playing style on grass is still more entertaining to watch for me than 95% of player's on Tour. A lost art of S&V, indeed.
I wonder how Djokovic could handle an actual SnVer like Rafter. He dismantled Thompson’s serve in that one game but JT also duffed a couple easy volleys too, before that Thompson was actually causing him some problems, playing good attacking stuff.
And obviously this is taking place with poly strings and the surest footing you’ll ever see on grass.
He would of sent Rather into the deep forests of Queensland.I wonder how Djokovic could handle an actual SnVer like Rafter. He dismantled Thompson’s serve in that one game but JT also duffed a couple easy volleys too, before that Thompson was actually causing him some problems, playing good attacking stuff.
And obviously this is taking place with poly strings and the surest footing you’ll ever see on grass.
Its entertaining when its one among the many that player other style .Jordan may get routined, but his playing style on grass is still more entertaining to watch for me than 95% of players on Tour. A lost art of S&V, indeed.
Fun fact: Jordan Thompson has played the most grass matches of any player (either ATP or WTA) in 2023 - 14 - including a final in Hertogenbosch.
He has a good serve and likes to slice the BH a lot, he’s (as much as it is possible these days) a classically styled Aussie grass player.
I quite like this as a 2nd round matchup, he won’t just roll over for Djokovic.
Something the matter, amigo?Again? What's wrong with you?
I'm with Sampras - Bruguera here, Novak tends to get frustrated when the things are out of his control, more than Nadal or Fed. A net charger with a big serve (not someone like Henman, for example) would challenge his patience for sure and force him to hit passing shots more than he's used to. The problem is that those guys would continue to approach the net even if they get passed 10 times in a row, which isn't the case with anyone today, they simply aren't as confident in their volleying skills and they knew how to close/cover the net, which is a very underrated skill these days.I wonder how Djokovic could handle an actual SnVer like Rafter. He dismantled Thompson’s serve in that one game but JT also duffed a couple easy volleys too, before that Thompson was actually causing him some problems, playing good attacking stuff.
And obviously this is taking place with poly strings and the surest footing you’ll ever see on grass.
It's dull for you, it's entertaining for me. That's why we need different conditions and brands of tennis, so everyone can enjoy their preferred playing style.Its entertaining when its one among the many that player other style .
When every single player played it and when 99% of a match you could hardly get a decent returning game which is how an average Wimbledon in the 90s looked, then its beyond dull.
Realistically with Rafter a career 61.8% 1st serves in, Djokovic would have plenty of chances to pass him at the net.What was that year he played Zverev indoors and all Zverev did was attack him at the net and got him all out of sorts. I think Djoker would have problems with Rafter cause djoker doesn't like people screwing with his rhythm. Rafter was a master at messing with your rhythm with his constant attack
I agreed that its entertaining at a present time. And too bad there isn't a few more players like Cressy that really force S&V.It's dull for you, it's entertaining for me. That's why we need different conditions and brands of tennis, so everyone can enjoy their preferred playing style.
I agree with this, but think that the Big 3 have a superior skill set in all aspects to handle any SV onslaught.It's dull for you, it's entertaining for me. That's why we need different conditions and brands of tennis, so everyone can enjoy their preferred playing style.
Totally agree. There’s just not a lot anyone can do against a great serve and a player who immediately comes to net, especially when they are as agile and skilled as a Rafter was.I'm with Sampras - Bruguera here, Novak tends to get frustrated when the things are out of his control, more than Nadal or Fed. A net charger with a big serve (not someone like Henman, for example) would challenge his patience for sure and force him to hit passing shots more than he's used to. The problem is that those guys would continue to approach the net even if they get passed 10 times in a row, which isn't the case with anyone today, they simply aren't as confident in their volleying skills and they knew how to close/cover the net, which is a very underrated skill these days.
Though he would pressure them a lot with his own superb return, but on grass it's much tougher to be as efficient as on, let's say, medium-fast hc. I also think that Sampras, with the power around his serve and forehand, great slice and superb net game, would be a nightmare match-up for Novak on grass.
Nadal has a losing record against a S&V player at Wimbledon (out of three matches they played), and not the one of Pete's or Becker's caliber, so it's not really as simple I think. My opinion is that the Big 3 have never been really tested against the elite S&V players, on grass in particular (except Fed in his early days on tour), these guys are very competent players, knew how to construct the points and, (again) more importantly, knew how to position themselves at the net and make the passing shots much, much tougher, even with poly strings. That's just my opinion based on watching the players who were trained all their lives to be competent at the net, you don't have that today, coaches have given up on teaching this style (even before the luxilon strings arrived on the scene).I agree with this, but think that the Big 3 have a superior skill set in all aspects to handle any SV onslaught.
They can do it themselves too.