TheMaestro1990
Hall of Fame
Federer has 4 titles, Djokovic has 5. Can the Swiss Maestro pull it off? Vote and discuss.
Two times a year. US and Wimbledon.Federer is too old. He doesnt have enough energy to play everything and win everything. He focuses himself to peak 3 times a year. You know why it is 3.
I said before the AO final "if Federer wins this, he has done it all. He has nothing left to prove". Remember, he gave us nr18, how magic was that?! I dont care what happens the rest of his career, he did it, no need for his fans to get greedy . He has the game for winning IW, but im satisfied either way.OP really needs a who cares option. If Fed goes out first round, he and his fans won't lose a moment's sleep. If Djokovic ends his career with thirteen of them, it improves his GOAT credentials not a single iota.
Not that Djokovic is a threat at IW, playing as poorly as he is.
Expect the usual trashing of Fed if he loses to Rafa at IWI said before the AO final "if Federer wins this, he has done it all. He has nothing left to prove". Remember, he gave us nr18, how magic was that?! I dont care what happens the rest of his career, he did it, no need for his fans to get greedy . He has the game for winning IW, but im satisfied either way.
Expect the usual trashing of Fed if he loses to Rafa at IW
Even though Fed has won their last 2 matches, which leaves Rafa with something to prove.
The only thing that matters to me as a Federer-Fan is: i dont care. Haters can trash him as much as they want, he gave me nr18 at age 35, what more can you ask for? . If Fedal meet, ill be happy for Rafa if he wins, just give me a good matchExpect the usual trashing of Fed if he loses to Rafa at IW
Even though Fed has won their last 2 matches, which leaves Rafa with something to prove.
AO, Rome & Monte CarloFederer is too old. He doesnt have enough energy to play everything and win everything. He focuses himself to peak 3 times a year. You know why it is 3.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Fed win against Rafa either. Not saying he will certainly win, just that it wouldn't shock me if he did.The only thing that matters to me as a Federer-Fan is: i dont care. Haters can trash him as much as they want, he gave me nr18 at age 35, what more can you ask for? . If Fedal meet, ill be happy for Rafa if he wins, just give me a good match
4 times actually. Wimb, Cincy, USO and WTF.Federer is too old. He doesnt have enough energy to play everything and win everything. He focuses himself to peak 3 times a year. You know why it is 3.
It would be the same if he was in the draw of Rafa and Nole at the AO. No, this one is def. tougherAs hard as the draw looks right now, we all said the same thing when we saw his draw at the AO and he still won. Now I'm not saying this will happen again at IW, but people seem to look at the draw and see Djokovic/Nadal for what they were before rather than what they are now. Nadal could fall in the 1st round and that wouldn't surprise, same thing for Djokovic who's been going through a life crysis for the last 8 months. Even Federer himself isn't prone to early round upsets anymore, none of them are. Matter fact, if the opposition on the other side of the net decides to play inspired tennis and start to believe in themselves, there's very strong chance of victory as those guys are nowhere near what they once were both mentally and physically.
Having Murray & Djokovic in your draw is much harder than Nadal/Djokovic at this point. Murray is the only top guy that's still somewhat dominant bearing AO.It would be the same if he was in the draw of Rafa and Nole at the AO. No, this one is def. tougher
I have never been scared of Murray as a Fed fan to be quite honest. I would have preferred Murray in Fed's draw than what he actually got.Having Murray & Djokovic in your draw is much harder than Nadal/Djokovic at this point. Murray is the only top guy that's still somewhat dominant bearing AO.
Over the last 2-3 years, totally agreeing with you on that one because 2014-2015 Federer had pretty much solved the "Murray" problem. However, between Murray, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray is the one who's in better form at the moment IMO which is why I see him as more dangerous.I have never been scared of Murray as a Fed fan to be quite honest. I would have preferred Murray in Fed's draw than what he actually got.
Roger played so well in that final.Nah think his chance was in 2014 where he was outplaying Djokovic for most of the match.
Roger played so well in that final.
Disappointing tiebreak as well it has to be said but apart from that his level was very high and his tennis ultra aggressive throughout. Fed really got up for playing Djokovic that year.In the end Djokovic was too solid and Roger didn't take his chances at key moments.
Be honest though Senti - even if the question had been "Can Federer equal Djokovic's AO record?" you'd have responded with something along the lines of "Who cares? 18 > 12". I swear some of you Fed fans are becoming more predictable by the day.Who carez ? This isn't a major .
Fed 'fans' like yourself is the main reason he's despised by so many not his game per seWho carez ? This isn't a major .
Aah, so a harmless remark like this, which did not even refer to anyone else riled you up so much that you hate another player ??? Wow !!! You must really then love all those fans who actually hate on other players and accuse them of doping.Fed 'fans' like yourself is the main reason he's despised by so many not his game per se
Why are you attributing things to me that I haven;t said ?Be honest though Senti - even if the question had been "Can Federer equal Djokovic's AO record?" you'd have responded with something along the lines of "Who cares? 18 > 12". I swear some of you Fed fans are becoming more predictable by the day.
Your comment was nothing but a pathetic attempt at (poor) trollingEven the other day when I merely asked who you were a fan of, you responded by asking me to "troll harder". Perhaps you should respond to posts with a bit more thought especially when you want to say such things because it paints you in pretty poor light.
To be honest, I would be ok with that.I think He'll beat Rafa but he won't run the gauntlet.
Tell me about itRoger played so well in that final.
I think its fairly reasonable to assume that someone in the position of Roger (or even Rafa at 30), should only focus on slams, and maybe WTF and not try to go for every record in the book.
How does this belittle Joker ? It only shows you are being too sensitive. I can understand because I do make some digs at Nole. However, this time what i said seemed quite reasonable. Even Nole should be focusing on slams and big titles IMO and not some specific record like Number of Masters at one event.
If you asked me whether Federer should go for Nole's AO record or Pete's WO record, even then I'd say he should take whatever slam he gets and not focus on one record.
Personally, after AO '17 I really couldn't care if he loses in the first round forever (just in case you want to know my personal views, lol)
Exactly! Who cares much if Federer, Nadal or Djokovic win IW? All it would be is some icing on the cake but it wouldn't add much to their legacies as ATGs. If any of them win IW it would be a nice bonus and perhaps show that they are in good form and will help boost their confidence which can possibly enable them to win more slams which is what matters most. It's not like they are players who have never won a Masters 1000 title and thus it's an important marker for them. They've all won multiple Masters 1000s.
As for Federer, I would love to see him win one more Wimbledon or USO. Those titles would be much more meaningful to his legacy. Djokovic can win all the IW and Miami titles from here to eternity but if he fails to win more slams his legacy won't be enhanced.
P.S. IW has always been pretty slow so I don't expect Federer to beat Nadal here if they meet.
No chance. Australia was a fast low bouncing court. Helped hide his backhand weakness. Indian wells will expose it. I expect him to be out before he faces nadal. He wont want to play nadal on a high bouncing hard court.Federer has 4 titles, Djokovic has 5. Can the Swiss Maestro pull it off? Vote and discuss.
You do realize he defeated Nadal at IW in 2012, right?No chance. Australia was a fast low bouncing court. Helped hide his backhand weakness. Indian wells will expose it. I expect him to be out before he faces nadal. He wont want to play nadal on a high bouncing hard court.