Return_Ace
Hall of Fame
Oh sorry. The only real Prestige...the mid.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
true . xD
Oh sorry. The only real Prestige...the mid.
Seems to be the same except the writing on the side.All four of mine are 63. Did they change the composition or just the stencil?
Havent noticed a difference between the sweetspot on this and my other 95 or 100 inch frames, i have ben amazed to find i actually hit the spot more on this tham the bb10s i also have!Isn't this headsize too small.? the sweetspot must be tiny
Each to his own.
Just my opinion, but the AG100 reminded me of the PS 85--not in its feel but in what I could do with it and how I felt when hitting. Like I was invincible and could put the ball on a dime anywhere in the court. (I used to feel that way sometimes with the PS 85.)
And, while the K90 racquet reminded me a lot of the feel of the PS 85 racquet in terms of weight, density, vibration, sound, I could not do all that much with it. I thus did not care for the K90. It is definitely an extremely stable racquet, but it didn't do anything for my game.
IMO the AG100 is better--in my hands.
The K90 was "a very serious racquet". I had to do everything exactly right with it--it was very demanding, all business. The AG100 was great fun: I still had to do most things right (of course), but it is lighter, more lively, faster, sharper, crisper, more rewarding than demanding.
Just MO.
gut at 55 lbs.
I have a demo of this racket. Strings have the Dunlop stencil. Could it be factory string job?
I tried it against one of my 5.5 hitting partners today. I simply could not get pace on my shots. He was pushing me far behind the baseline and I was coughing up too many short balls. I'm no Nadal. Hence, I can't effectively play back there. I had high expectations from this racket. I was not expecting this poor performance.
After some minutes I switched to my K90 and continued with the rest of our session comfortably.
What am I missing?
I am going to try it out against a different hitting partner tomorrow. He produces less pace from his groundies. Perhaps I can appreciate the AG100 more tomorrow.
I'm still awestruck at what eludes me from this racket many of you have experienced and enjoyed.
I appreciate your input guys.
Believe me, I tried to hit harder than usual and the racket did not feel good. If I tried to hit harder I may bring harm to my body. I've been known to push my body beyond its capabilities and suffered severe (sometimes permanent) physical consequences. I could not generate much pace. All the pace occurring on court was coming from the other side of the net.
I hope for a more favorable experience next time with the racket. I'm not giving up on it yet. I want to realize the specialness everyone consistently chimes.
jason, if your strokes are grooved for the K90 -- a much heavier stick and with a much higher sw than the AG100 -- I guess I'm not surprised at the results you got, especially with the crummy demo strings in the AG.BTW, is anyone hitting with 5.0+ hitting partners and being effective with this racket?
If so, enlighten me on how you do it?
Perhaps bossass is right about the poor strings in the demo.
I agree and understand completely with what jasonbourne's saying. When I demoed the AG100, I loved the feeling the racquet gives you with each swing, and it excels in volleying and serves. The only thing I thought the racquet was lacking in was weight, which I especially noticed when my partner hit a heavy ball at me, or even when he simply hit a long ball and I struck it out of the air before it bounced. In those situations the lack of plow-through was very noticable, and I could feel the racquet slowing down upon impact with the ball.I appreciate your input guys.
Believe me, I tried to hit harder than usual and the racket did not feel good. If I tried to hit harder I may bring harm to my body. I've been known to push my body beyond its capabilities and suffered severe (sometimes permanent) physical consequences. I could not generate much pace. All the pace occurring on court was coming from the other side of the net.
I hope for a more favorable experience next time with the racket. I'm not giving up on it yet. I want to realize the specialness everyone consistently chimes.
Hi JB,I have a demo of this racket. Strings have the Dunlop stencil. Could it be factory string job?
I tried it against one of my 5.5 hitting partners today. I simply could not get pace on my shots. He was pushing me far behind the baseline and I was coughing up too many short balls. I'm no Nadal. Hence, I can't effectively play back there. I had high expectations from this racket. I was not expecting this poor performance.
After some minutes I switched to my K90 and continued with the rest of our session comfortably.
What am I missing?
I am going to try it out against a different hitting partner tomorrow. He produces less pace from his groundies. Perhaps I can appreciate the AG100 more tomorrow.
I'm still awestruck at what eludes me from this racket many of you have experienced and enjoyed.
Like Keifers said, I think you need to try it with some weight added to the handle and to the hoop and with a lower string tension. That should help you.BTW, is anyone hitting with 5.0+ hitting partners and being effective with this racket?
If so, enlighten me on how you do it?
Perhaps bossass is right about the poor strings in the demo.
I appreciate your input guys.
Believe me, I tried to hit harder than usual and the racket did not feel good. If I tried to hit harder I may bring harm to my body. I've been known to push my body beyond its capabilities and suffered severe (sometimes permanent) physical consequences. I could not generate much pace. All the pace occurring on court was coming from the other side of the net.
I hope for a more favorable experience next time with the racket. I'm not giving up on it yet. I want to realize the specialness everyone consistently chimes.
jason, if your strokes are grooved for the K90 -- a much heavier stick and with a much higher sw than the AG100 -- I guess I'm not surprised at the results you got, especially with the crummy demo strings in the AG.
You would indeed have to swing with much more energy to get the same pace. And your hitting partner's fast-paced balls are going to push the AG around unless your timing is right on and you hit the sweetspot.
I would guess you would see significant improvement if
1. You stopped using the K90 and re-grooved your strokes for the AG.
2. You put a livelier string in there at lower tension.
3. You added weight to the AG.
Or 4. Any combo of (or all of) the above.
Hi JB,
I'd hate to say it.....but I told you so, right? ;-)
Plus I hated the stock grip.
The softness and tackiness were okay, but I could not feel the bevels. And the grip was too smooth with no ridges or valleys where I like to insert my thumb, index finger, and little finger.I actually liked the stock grip; soft (maybe a little too soft) and tacky. I was demoing a K95 at the same time, and the K-Grip that came with that racquet felt similar, too.
I can only add lead (2-3oz) at the top of the handle.
hoodjem, I use lead roofing material. They come in sheets made of dense lead. This is what I used to lead my n90s to 16oz in the past. Comfortable configuration for stiff sticks.
You're welcome, JB!ZZdark, Keifers, BP, hoodjem,
Thanks for your suggestions to modify and help redeem my feelings towards the AG100. Since it is not my racket, I can only add lead (2-3oz) at the top of the handle that would increase its static weight and SW.
I recently picked up the Aerogel 100 in 4 1/4 grip.
I added 18 grams to the racket:
8 grams at 0.5" - handle.
8 grams at 22.8" - roughly 10 and 2 o'clock.
2 grams at 12 o'clock.
I also replaced the synthetic grip with TW leather and an over-grip.
The racket is now weighted at 350g.
You're welcome, JB!
Do you think you could install a leather grip on your demo racquet temporarily? I think that would help quite a bit.
Good luck!
^^^
Another possibility is to open the trap door in the butt cap and put some lead in there.
A friend of mine added 8 grams to his AG100 by putting lead in there.
Not criticizing you, jason... just adding 2-3 ozs of lead at top of the handle would mess up the balance and sw of the racquet for me, making the comparison with the K90 somewhat unfair. Imo...
16oz i.e x 28.35 = 453.. are you super pete... man that is way too much..
Now that Jason's wrist has recovered, he is back to his standard 22 ounce racquet.nn, this weight was used for less than a year as I recovered from a wrist injury.
Was the extra weight of the leather grip and overgrip part of the "8 grams at 0.5" - handle"?I recently picked up the Aerogel 100 in 4 1/4 grip.
I added 18 grams to the racket:
8 grams at 0.5" - handle.
8 grams at 22.8" - roughly 10 and 2 o'clock.
2 grams at 12 o'clock.
I also replaced the synthetic grip with TW leather and an over-grip.
The racket is now weighted at 350g.
Was the extra weight of the leather grip and overgrip part of the "8 grams at 0.5" - handle"?
Was the extra weight of the leather grip and overgrip part of the "8 grams at 0.5" - handle"?
Really? Are you sure? I didn't weigh the original synthetic grip nor the TW leather grip separately but I would have guessed the weight difference to be closer to 8 grams or so as just changing grips increased the weight of the racquet by about 0.3 oz.The difference in weight between the original synthetic grip and TW leather was only 2g.
Yes... it doesn't take much weight on the AG100. I add a leather grip and about 12-16 grams (approx. 0.5 oz.) at 9/3. With those two simple modification it weighs between 12.5-12.8 oz. and plays perfectly.
Really? Are you sure? I didn't weigh the original synthetic grip nor the TW leather grip separately but I would have guessed the weight difference to be closer to 8 grams or so as just changing grips increased the weight of the racquet by about 0.3 oz.
Thanks, jason. Let me try to clarify...Keifers, no criticism taken. I appreciate your suggestions and try to be open to learning different ways to achieve a better result.
Adding the extra weight to the handle of the AG100 would be unfair for K90? I don't think I followed your point.
The most "neutral" place (swing-wise) to add a lot of weight is directly under where your hand grips the racquet. Alternatively (not touching the grip), you would add weight above the handle and some weight in or on the butt cap to counterbalance the weight above the handle. (There's a very good tutorial about adding weight at racquet research . com (remove spaces).)
Yes, I have hit with the MG Prestige Mid and really liked it. However, when I hit with it back-to-back with my AK90, I still preferred the feel of the AK90 as it just felt more "solid" to me. But the MGP had more power so it was easier for me to hit winners with it. Both the MGP and the AG100 are great racquets and it would be hard to decide between the two. They just have different feels and the biggest difference may be their string patterns, although the AG100 plays a tad stiffer to me than the MGP.BP also warned me that the AG might be a little light for my taste and he was right. Btw, did you ever hit with the MG Prestige BP?
Yeah, I was surprised by the difference - or lack of difference. So much so that I actually unwrapped the TW leather grip and weighed it side by side with the original synthetic grip.
I use the 22mm x 1.3mm TW grip.
What I've found is that these grips (same size, 22 x 1.3) vary quite a bit in weight. I've found as much as a 3 gram difference in their weight...