Tennis was born on grass.
Wimbledon is undeniably the most prestigious event in the game according to Nadal, Novak and all the greats.
It's unreasonable to slam a grass masters 1000 when it's obviously possible to host a solid grass tournament. Queens, Halle, Stuttgart, and Wimbledon don't seem to be having trouble getting players, crowds or money.
I grew up in the States - kind of a big country for tennis not too long ago - playing plenty of tennis. And I never saw a clay court in my life except maybe once. But I can't remember. I did see plenty of grass courts at a country club my brother belongs to.
So... Yeah. I think at least one grass masters - when you've got 3 clay - shouldn't be a problem.
Well, 90% to 95% of tennis courts in South America, where I live, are of red clay. Rest is hard courts and no grass at all.
I’ve played tennis in the US when I go visit and it’s always been in hard courts, and I still haven’t seen a grass court there.
The only time in my life I’ve seen grass courts was in an English community club in Argentina, and never had the chance to play in them so far. I remember they told me that those were available to play only for 3 to 4 months during the year.
That’s why I say grass courts are an anomaly, at least for me. I would like to see the results of a TTW poll about which surface do users regularly play in. I don’t believe grass courts should get more than 5%.
I don’t deny grass in tennis history and tradition, however grass is very far from popular now.