Just unbelievable how stubborn on serve position he is!
Maybe for you, but I'm discussing Roger Federer.
Backerer would surely need a high quality belt for both and Nadal would need to mummify those knees. Djoker would blatantly pull sumo.
Then no one is GOAT because no one ever "dominated" opponents of equally ability. If one did, the opponent would not be considered to be of equal ability.
That's every one handers's weakness though. Even Thiem's.
19-10 is "dominating?"
And don’t try "outside clay" nonsense.
Well, he is older than them so we have to take that into account.
Do you think players become less clutch with age or are less clutch when facing younger opponents? I do not disagree just asking.
I think both.
Irrelevant.
Nadovic.
Hubris is Federer's greatest weakness, the same way that Nadal's greatest weakness is being always injured.
ok
They all have their weaknesses: Got to be pleased with 20 GS.Break point conversions (especially in his later years) and lack of a true killer instinct. Had he had Connors or Nadal's killer instinct, he would be sitting on 30 majors. 20 is still quite spectacular.
10-4 is dominating.
Definitely this.Break point conversions (especially in his later years) and lack of a true killer instinct. Had he had Connors or Nadal's killer instinct, he would be sitting on 30 majors. 20 is still quite spectacular.
Nadal manages his weakness betterer.
Djokovic is more complete than Nadal across the surfaces and Nadal's h2h are clay skewed.
Until 2008 his opposition was substantially weaker, so his areas of weakness -which remain few -were disguised.Weaknesserer still only at 20. Will definitely get Betterer.
I thought old people are wise and we should be respectful to them. Can't say the same about you
Fed is not good in coming back from behind too, comparatively to others.
Doesn’t he have like 23 matches won after saving MPs? And 10 matches won after losing the first two sets? I’m pretty sure both are records, but correct me if I’m wrong.
He isn't good at performing comebacks against top opponents usually. Nadal Wimb 2008, Djokovic Wimb 2019, Nadal AO 2009 and others. He gives you hope, then proceeds to crush it.
It's quite puzzling to be honest - Federer in his prime was known to be the greatest frontrunner in tennis. If you gave him a lead, you just weren't getting it back - unless you were either Nalbandian or Djokovic. But as he got older, his confidence wavered more often - especially in 2010, where he lost multiple matches after holding match points.
His stats are superior to Novak and especially Nadal in coming back from two sets to love down in slams. So the remark is demonstrably false. Google it.
