DanS
Semi-Pro
I agreeIn my opinion, the PP100P doesn't need more weight.
I will post my impressions of this fantastic weapon soon.
I agreeIn my opinion, the PP100P doesn't need more weight.
I will post my impressions of this fantastic weapon soon.
Totally agree. If you have a PP100 and add weight... It is because you finally need a PP100P, lol......In my opinion, the PP100P doesn't need more weight.
Most important thing, did you feel really much more comfort with the Prince than the Pure Aero?? What your joints have to say?Here is the review of a 3.5 rated 40 years old player for the Pro100. I am basically a baseline player with very weak 2nd serve, zero net game and my current racket was Pure Aero 2017 model with RPM Blast 1.20 strings. I read many posts and reviews to decide to buy the Prince Pro100 racket and ordered it from tenniswarehouse without trying first cause in Greece Prince is orphan right now without a dealer.
Before choosing it I was 50-50 between this and the latest pure drive (100 inches). I also tried the yonex e-zone and 2 Volk models but I did not like them at all. Pure drive was very nice and my two hand backhands and first serves were blazing fast. Finishing weak short balls with winners was also piece of cake. BUT the positive reviews for the PP100 convinced me to chose the Prince racket and I have not regret it.
I went with the Technifibre HDX 17 @ 48 lbs as it had many recommendations here from many gurus. When I started hitting I immediately understood what you guys meant by the buttery feeling. Strokes were super deep and the spin was amazing. Slices were flawless due to the extra thin frame of the racket, I never failed due to hitting the frame using the slice. Also it never felt underpowered. The ball was traveling fast and deep with minimal effort. Now the cons:
When I tried to hit winners though and used all my strength, the ball was going long. Also the service game was difficult to hit fast aces. Balls were also going long when using full strength. However my random spin serves were wicked when they went in.
I played 2 sets with my young female teacher and it was the first time I won so easily. 6-1 6-1 both sets. She just couldn't keep up with my the hi trajectory deep top spin balls and my backhand slices (Fernando Lopez style). The pressure was tremendous. Highly recommended for 3-4 rated players. My risk to buy it blind paid off.
Looking to enlarge sweetspot. Sometimes just feels hard to find as though I'm playing with a 95. Could be string tension but that's still work in progress.Why adding weight in a racket designed to arm friendliness??
On a different note has anyone placed weight at 3 and 9 and felt it has stiffened the frame up? I've placed 2 TW tungsten strips on the frame with 1 full strip on each side on opposite string planes. Didn't quite feel like the sweet spot opened up and felt more stiff. Now I'm going to cut the strips in half and do it the conventional way to see if a more localised point of weight will make a difference.
So you put a strip on one side top and the other side bottom?On a different note has anyone placed weight at 3 and 9 and felt it has stiffened the frame up? I've placed 2 TW tungsten strips on the frame with 1 full strip on each side on opposite string planes. Didn't quite feel like the sweet spot opened up and felt more stiff. Now I'm going to cut the strips in half and do it the conventional way to see if a more localised point of weight will make a difference.
So you put a strip on one side top and the other side bottom?
Must always do 4 spots if adding tape at 3/9. Above and below stringbed on both sides.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
Let us know how it works out! You may or may not remember, but I tried adding weight at first, but ended up removing all of it. I traded the PP100 I had for another PP100P. It came strung with Signum Pro Tornado @35. After hitting with it, I realized that low string weight solved all my issues with the racquet. The funny thing is I probably would have never gone that low on my own. I guess even old dogs can learn new tricks if you force them to! lolYeah. I followed it from a YouTube video from TW on expanding the sweetspot. Troy explained tungsten is denser which permits it spread out like that. Didn't work out for me so going back to the normal way. Hoping for different result. Not sure how it'll play.
Yea I could end up the same. Right now it's 6 grams total at 3 and 9. Failing that I'll try 3 grams total at 3 and 9. If still no good then I'm pretty sure my ideal placement is at 10 and 2 which I tried before. I liked it but it didn't solve my sweetspot problem so that part might boil down to string tension.Let us know how it works out! You may or may not remember, but I tried adding weight at first, but ended up removing all of it. I traded the PP100 I had for another PP100P. It came strung with Signum Pro Tornado @35. After hitting with it, I realized that low string weight solved all my issues with the racquet. The funny thing is I probably would have never gone that low on my own. I guess even old dogs can learn new tricks if you force them to! lol
Honestly, almost the entire string bed feels like the sweet spot at that tension. I would have never guessed a poly could feel so comfortable either! Definitely worth a try.Yea I could end up the same. Right now it's 6 grams total at 3 and 9. Failing that I'll try 3 grams total at 3 and 9. If still no good then I'm pretty sure my ideal placement is at 10 and 2 which I tried before. I liked it but it didn't solve my sweetspot problem so that part might boil down to string tension.
Hoping for others to chime in on this.
If you really want to increase plow through put it at 12. When you put lead/tungsten at 3 and 9 it increases the twist weight/stability which is something I don't think this frame really needs. Loweing your string tension will increase the sweet spot a lot more, and increases power as well.I put half of full strip on each side 3 & 9 totaling 3grams on my PP100P. I get more plow-thru and didnt' feel an increase in stiffness.. anyhow I think the tungten englarge the sweetspot
You mean the Oport 100? I have to agree with the description that the feel is very "vague." Not my cup of tea.What big differences between Pro 100 and 100?
Most important thing, did you feel really much more comfort with the Prince than the Pure Aero?? What your joints have to say?
Its a Very thin frame designed mostly for comford but that can be improved by just adding weightYou mean the Oport 100? I have to agree with the description that the feel is very "vague." Not my cup of tea.
The Pro is almost my perfect racquet but becomes a liability when on defense due to the low stockweight gets killed by a heavy shot.
Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk
Totally agree. If you have a PP100 and add weight... It is because you finally need a PP100P, lol......
In my opinion, the PP100P doesn't need more weight.
I will post my impressions of this fantastic weapon soon.
I have a PP100P and I don't think it needs more weight from a plowthrough/mass standpoint, but I *do* think it needs a little weight added to increase the sweet spot a bit, hits outside the sweet spot can be a little harsh. So, I am conflicted, and haven't added any weight as of yet. Still thinking about it, though.
I tried a full bed of Cyclone 17 at 33x29 and it didn't increase the sweet spot near as much as I was hoping, still a bit harsh on hits outside. Liked the set-up pretty well on groundstrokes, but felt it was underpowered for my 1st serves. Ended up cutting it out and am going to try Prince Tour XP in there to see how I like it in that racquet, as I love it in one of my other racquets, an 03 Speedport Black.
25 more grams with the 93 makes a difference!I demo Phantom pro 100 today and hit it around 2 hours..... since the flex is 54, but I dont feel that much different compared to Phamton 93p which is 61. That is wired. Does anyone know? Also, I feel pro kennex redondo 98MP is more flexy than these two....
Let us know how it works out! You may or may not remember, but I tried adding weight at first, but ended up removing all of it. I traded the PP100 I had for another PP100P. It came strung with Signum Pro Tornado @35. After hitting with it, I realized that low string weight solved all my issues with the racquet. The funny thing is I probably would have never gone that low on my own. I guess even old dogs can learn new tricks if you force them to! lol
I found the sweet spot to be lower in the frame than i was accustomed (esp on serve) so some weight at the tip helped me. I dont have issues with torsional stability but its fair weak/dead too far off the centre 6 strings. Guess I need to just get better haha
pro kennex redondo 98MP is more flexy than these two.... I mean the feel and comfort
I would say if your name is "The Incredible Hulk" you should probably avoid the Phantom line all together! lol
I would say if your name is "The Incredible Hulk" you should probably avoid the Phantom line all together! lol
What about during stringing? I have a 2 point mount and it does make me very nervous seeing how it bends out of shape after im done with the mains.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
One of my PP100P's was on spec, one was over by 4g, and the PP100 I used to have was under by 3g.Is it real that many Phantom's are under spec??
How it was?I will now be testing the Phantom Pro with Technifibre Multifeel black 16.
How it was?
Multifeel in the Phantom Pro is phenomenal. There are a lot of superlatives I can name to describe how good this string -frame combination is, like fantastic, outstanding, amazing, the list just goes on. Multifeel in the Phantom Pro went beyond my expectations. Dipping spin on serves , ground strokes and angles was just so nice when you realize that this is a multi and not a poly. The power and comfort were superb. I felt like the control was so good that I almost didn't think that I could make a mistake. You really need to try this string- frame combination in order to understand what I experienced. Power, control, spin and comfort are all there in large quantities, so do yourself a favor and give this combination a try, you want regret it.How it was?
I'm actually playing with both Multifeel 15L natural and HDX 15L at 53/50lbs (24/23kg) in my PP100's and it is really good. But it would be even better with 16 or 17g and lower tension like 49/46lbs (22/21kg).I used the black Multifeel in 16 guage strung at 21 kg (45 lbs.)
I don't hit too much flat serve so no problem for me. Kick and slice serve are perfect. And the PP100 was designed to NOT BE powerful....... It's an incredibly comfort, precise and control frame.My main problem is that PP100 lack on serve And a bit on power in general Although is a nice racket over all much better than old tour 100 16/18 but not better from the dr98 on serve And power
Yes i agree... DR98 is also a comfort frame So no problem for me, i dont like stiff rackets eitherI don't hit too much flat serve so no problem for me. Kick and slice serve are perfect. And the PP100 was designed to NOT BE powerful....... It's an incredibly comfort, precise and control frame.
My main problem is that PP100 lack on serve And a bit on power in general Although is a nice racket over all much better than old tour 100 16/18 but not better from the dr98 on serve And power[/Qva
Have you tried a multi like HDX or Multifeel? They both provide good power. I prefer HDX in 17 guage and Multifeel black inMy main problem is that PP100 lack on serve And a bit on power in general Although is a nice racket over all much better than old tour 100 16/18 but not better from the dr98 on serve And power
Have you tried a multi like HDX or Multifeel? Both strings provide good power. I like HDX in 17 guage and Multifeel black in 16 guage.My main problem is that PP100 lack on serve And a bit on power in general Although is a nice racket over all much better than old tour 100 16/18 but not better from the dr98 on serve And power
I play heavy topspin and multi is not my thing, only When my shoulder Hurt i use hybrid or full bed of multi otherwise full bed of yptp which is a soft poly at 48-50pounds.At PP100 or tour 100 i string 46-48 pounds because its low power framesHave you tried a multi like HDX or Multifeel? Both strings provide good power. I like HDX in 17 guage and Multifeel black in 16 guage.
Never tried hdx, i use isospeed control classic and i am Very pleased for a multi perspective. My PP100 setup has 1gr at 12,32,2 balance, 328gr strung with yptp/isospeed control classic 46/48pounds, nice comboHave you tried a multi like HDX or Multifeel? Both strings provide good power. I like HDX in 17 guage and Multifeel black in 16 guage.
Never tried hdx, i use isospeed control classic and i am Very pleased for a multi perspective. My PP100 setup has 1gr at 12,32,2 balance, 328gr strung with yptp/isospeed control classic 46/48pounds, nice combo
It's why I will try Signum Pro X-perience 17L. HDX provide really good spin but not enough for my taste.I play heavy topspin and multi is not my thing
Agree. Cyclone Tour is really good but really poor tension maintenance. I will try pretty soon Cyclone 1.15 and X-perience 1.18. Cannot wait!!!I dont see a problem using a soft poly to a very soft racket like pp100, cyclone tour is another good string really soft if someone gas a sensitive arm and tons of spin. For a 4.5-5.0 player with heavy spin no multi will last after 5-6 hours max and no multi can offer the same playability compare to polys, thats my experience