Remembering the grass monster Federer was

[nolefam_2024]

These are facts, not excuses. Fed was roughly the same age as Novak when he won Wimbledon 2012 So your other point has been debunked.

Fed won 1 slam, Novak won 2. That was also Fed's last slam for close to 5 years, let's see what Novak does.

As Novak has clearly outperformed Fed at 31, whatever he wins for next 5 years is Bonus. Nole fans don't cry Novak is old.

 

[mike danny]

Yes, that's true.

When Novak loses to Stan, I don't cry, ohh Nole so old.

Fedfans are pathetic in that department, Fed can be no1 when Novak is not there but as soon as its Nole's big win, Fed is old.

Hey, it is true. If you don't like it, that's your problem. You turned this thread into a Federer-Djokovic **** fight, so suck it up.

 

[mike danny]

Why would he? If Fed can do it, Nole can too.

It doesn't work like that. Fed has won 2 different slams 5 times in a row and was no.1 for 237 consecutive weeks. Djokovic hasn't been close to any of these.

 

[mike danny]

Right, so stop giving excuse.

At Novak's age Fed was not winning slams, Novak won 2 this year.

At Novak's age Fed was winning slams.

 

[mike danny]

Fed won 1 slam, Novak won 2. That was also Fed's last slam for close to 5 years, let's see what Novak does.

As Novak has clearly outperformed Fed at 31, whatever he wins for next 5 years is Bonus. Nole fans don't cry Novak is old.

Because Novak is incredibly fortunate not to be dealing with any significantly younger ATG or any significantly younger players for that matter otherwise he wouldn't be winning slams.

Of course he doesn't look old in this incredible scenario

 

[nolefam_2024]

Hey, it is true. If you don't like it, that's your problem. You turned this thread into a Federer-Djokovic **** fight, so suck it up.

I didn't turn it. The OP put a stat and I put counter stat.

Fedfans came fighting back.

Fed when winning is awesome when losing is old. His fans like you are pathetic. They blame Rafans for injury card and can't face the fact that Fed won his early slams with lesser competition and Novak faced Fed and Rafa from the start.

Well its Novak's turn now to get some weak competition as well just like Fed had in his early years.

 

[mike danny]

I didn't turn it. The OP put a stat and I put counter stat.

Fedfans came fighting back.

Fed when winning is awesome when losing is old. His fans like you are pathetic. They blame Rafans for injury card and can't face the fact that Fed won his early slams with lesser competition and Novak faced Fed and Rafa from the start.

Well its Novak's turn now to get some weak competition as well just like Fed had in his early years.

Yeah, fans like me are pathetic while fans like you who run away when Novak is losing and only show up when he is winning are very honorable indeed

Djokovic has had weak competition since 2014, it isn't just starting now. But you are just as biased like every other fan out there and refuse to see it.

Fed is old, that is a fact, not an excuse. You just refuse to accept it because you know deep down it devalues Novak's wins.

 

[Devilito]

RIP in peace

 

[Djokovicfan]

Why do you guys care so much about who is best? Fed nad and djo are all within a
Stones throw of eachother. You should choose your wall posters by who you like watching the most, not who is 1-2% better than the others. Their records
Against eachother are all close to even. Its like
Saying this sports car is 0.1 seconds quicker around the track. Its meaningless if you consider the faster sportscar might be much less fun to drive than the slower one. So who cares who is best. Be happy to be alive with a television when the 3 goats are all active.

 

[ForumMember]

This suggests that Federer numbers may have been as good for 14,15 and 17 if you remove your numbers against Djokovic. And Federer will look same monster as he was in his SUPPOSEDLY peak years.

 

[ForumMember]

Nu

2003-04 fed to be the same as 14-15 fed !?
just quit with the BS, will ya ?

oh and Roddick did break Federer 4 times in the 2004 final....but since you are focussed on your agenda., things like that fly right past you.

Nunmbers suggest that it was same if no Djokovic.

 

[abmk]

This suggests that Federer numbers may have been as good for 14,15 and 17 if you remove your numbers against Djokovic. And Federer will look same monster as he was in his SUPPOSEDLY peak years.

Nu


Nunmbers suggest that it was same if no Djokovic.