SinneGoat Miami Post Match "#NextGen not ready to win against BIG3"

[lim]

 

[Deleted member 771911]

Incredible. Even our great hope does not believe.

 

[weakera]

 

[Deleted member 748597]

How dare you, boy. You're supposed to save tennis. You're supposed to save Federer.

 

[duaneeo]

Well, he says it can be "2 year or 5 years"...meaning when the Big-3 are 36/37/42 years old or 39/40/45 years old, the NextGen will start beating the Big-3 consistently. So, there's hope!

 

[-snake-]

Yet another weakling.

 

[Omega_7000]

How dare you, boy. You're supposed to save tennis. You're supposed to save Federer.

Novak crazies are out in full force hating on a 19 year old who has only showed some promise without any significant results. Sinner better beef up his security if he does manage to beat him in the future.

 

[ZYW]

What hate? You are overreacting.

 

[Arak]

The boy is mature beyond his age. He has the courage to speak the truth.

 

[Jonesy]

Which next gen? His next gen? Raonic next gen? Thiem next gen? Medvedev next gen? All next gen?

 

[Deleted member 748597]

Novak crazies are out in full force hating on a 19 year old who has only showed some promise without any significant results. Sinner better beef up his security if he does manage to beat him in the future.

Didn't you hear already? I am a fake Novak fan according to my own fanbase. Therefore, when someone calls me the bolded part, I have an identity crisis.

And I am not hating on Sinner . I actually like the guy. I just have a weird sense of humor. Even Sinner fans know that I'm not a hater.

 

[yokied]

****ing shameful. Aslan won’t cower in the corner. He fears only one thing more than being forced by me (and Russian gangsters) at gunpoint to start de-djokodaling draws: returning to mediocrity and obscurity.

 

[Born_to_slice]

 

[mike danny]

A win over 37.5 year old Fed is as irrelevant as it gets.

The win over Nadal was good, but then laid an egg against Med.

 

[Born_to_slice]

A win over 37.5 year old Fed is as irrelevant as it gets.

The win over Nadal was good, but then laid an egg against Med.

Federer won AO 2 times in a row 2017/2018 but suddenly became irrelevant a year later, in the same year Djokovic barely stopped him from winning another Wimbledon.

Anyway, Sinner claims that next gens aren't ready to beat big 3, which is incorrect as all major next gens have victories against them and in Tsitsipas' case it's incorrect in slams too.

 

[Deleted member 762343]

A win over 37.5 year old Fed is as irrelevant as it gets.

The win over Nadal was good, but then laid an egg against Med.

Yeah, a win against 37 years old Federer is irrelevant but a win against 35 years old Nadal is super meaningful. That’s some high level of double standards.

 

[mike danny]

Yeah, a win against 37 years old Federer is irrelevant but a win against 35 years old Nadal is super meaningful. That’s some high level of double standards.

Well, 35 is still younger than 37.5.

 

[mike danny]

Federer won AO 2 times in a row 2017/2018 but suddenly became irrelevant a year later, in the same year Djokovic barely stopped him from winning another Wimbledon.

Anyway, Sinner claims that next gens aren't ready to beat big 3, which is incorrect as all major next gens have victories against them and in Tsitsipas' case it's incorrect in slams too.

Hey, it happens. Djokovic won the AO back to back in 2015 and 2016 and then in 2017 he lost to Istomin. Not the best argument.

Sorry, but a 20.5 year old beating a 37.5 year old should not be considered an upset, that's why to me this win is irrelevant. Especially since he got his ass handed to him by Nadal next.

 

[Red Rick]

Saying the quiet parts out loud I see.

 

[zipplock]

I'm just not impressed with this kid. Will see what he does over the next 5 years.

 

[blablavla]

Which next gen? His next gen? Raonic next gen? Thiem next gen? Medvedev next gen? All next gen?

Nishikori, Dimitrov, Goffin & Raonic

 

[blablavla]

Yeah, a win against 37 years old Federer is irrelevant but a win against 35 years old Nadal is super meaningful. That’s some high level of double standards.

I wonder why ATP has Nadal listed at 34 years old, and why Novak is listed at 33 years old.
Either you're trolling here, or they are awfully wrong.

 

[Sport]

A win over 37.5 year old Fed is as irrelevant as it gets.

The win over Nadal was good, but then laid an egg against Med.

A win against 34.9 years old Nad is as irrelevant as it gets.

I can also play this game.

 

[mike danny]

Anyway, Sinner claims that next gens aren't ready to beat big 3, which is incorrect as all major next gens have victories against them and in Tsitsipas' case it's incorrect in slams too.

Well, the big 3 have won 15 of the last 16 slams so Sinner is not wrong at all.

 

[mike danny]

A win against 34.9 years old Nad is as irrelevant as it gets.

I can also play this game.

Play it. Age is the reason Nadal lost anyway.

 

[Jonesy]

Nishikori, Dimitrov, Goffin & Raonic

Raonic is getting closer and closer to beating Djokovic.

 

[StrongRule]

Well, 35 is still younger than 37.5.

I guess Gulbis beating Federer in RG 2014 was very relevant then.

 

[Sport]

Play it. Age is the reason Nadal lost anyway.

 

[mike danny]

I guess Gulbis beating Federer in RG 2014 was very relevant then.

It wasn't. But we're comparing 2 guys aged 35 and 37.5. You do the math.

 

[Born_to_slice]

Mike The "Ever Moving Goalpost" Danny

 

[mike danny]

Mike The "Ever Moving Goalpost" Danny

Nah, I made my point pretty clear several times. Was never high on Tsitsipas's win over Fed.

 

[Deleted member 762343]

I wonder why ATP has Nadal listed at 34 years old, and why Novak is listed at 33 years old.
Either you're trolling here, or they are awfully wrong.

Because their birthday is in May and June respectively so they’re technically 33 and 34. But they’re in their 34th and 35th year.

 

[Mainad]

Will they ever be ready?

 

[blablavla]

Will they ever be ready?

they are patiently waiting the moment when the Big 3 will retire

 

[Born_to_slice]

Nah, I made my point pretty clear several times. Was never high on Tsitsipas's win over Fed.

You made your strawman, alright. It's about what Sinner said and reality, not about whether you are impressed by something or not.

 

[The Guru]

Yeah, a win against 37 years old Federer is irrelevant but a win against 35 years old Nadal is super meaningful. That’s some high level of double standards.

Age only matters if its Fedr

 

[daphne]

What hate? You are overreacting.

Hormonal

 

[mike danny]

Age only matters if its Fedr

Nah...

 

[SinneGOAT]

Why are you doing this to me

 

[Hitman]

LOL - He said that?

 

[Rovesciarete]

His key word here is ‘consistently’...