But that's not what you said. Now you're backtracking.
I’m not. As I have never argued this current era is weak. I have admitted that many times. What I pointed out though was Fed had a period where his early era was weak too.
I’m just pointing out it’s not only Djokovic who has benefitted from the weak era. Fed did in his early career and let’s be honest Nadal has on clay too. Yes he’s a god on clay but he’s been so far ahead on that surface you could say the clay era was weak.
Albeit Djokovic and Federer were very good clay courters they still weren’t a specialist on it like Rafa. Then there was no one else who could challenge Rafa at RG or usually clay in general.
They have all benefitted from it. Rafa has also had some very lucky us open draws he’s capitalised on. Again not taking anything away from him but things have aligned for him well there.
The same for Djokovic and federer in some slams. Basically they have all benefited from weaker competition, weaker draws, main rival being injured at some point. Although because they are all ATG’s and special players they have also won so much due to their all court games, amazing mental strength and ability to keep reinventing themselves.
It’s more the fact people are conveniently forgetting earlier eras because we are living in this one. Due to this era being weak now which I don’t deny. That doesn’t mean we should forget eras in the past where tennis was weaker too. Some people have short term memories or selective memories on what they want to remember to suit their agenda.