Enceladus
Legend
And you were right. And yet Thiem had to turn the final from 0-2 to sets.So basically Thiem needs an absolute mug in a big final in order to win one.
And you were right. And yet Thiem had to turn the final from 0-2 to sets.So basically Thiem needs an absolute mug in a big final in order to win one.
Technically, he did get a good player, but who played like a mug, so I guess I wasAnd you were right. And yet Thiem had to turn the final from 0-2 to sets.
57 bp's is the record wtfThe match Djoker-Karatsev from 2021 Serbia Open is in 6th place among Bo3 matches in the number of created break points:
57 bp's is the record wtf
And on HC. That's crazy
21% (6 of 28) | 21% (6 of 29) |
Malivai Washington winning a tour level title at Bermuda in 1996, beating opponents with the following rankings:
#312 Luke Jensen
#320 Franco Squillari
#720 Bill Behrens
#386 Mariano Zabaleta
#105 Marcelo Filippini
Other examples I can think of where players won tour level titles without beating any opponents ranked in the top 100, were Albert Costa at Bournemouth in 1996, Jan Kroslak at Shanghai in 1997, John Isner at Newport in 2017 and Steve Johnson at Newport in 2018.
Kuerten's title at Acapulco in 2001 (although he beat Mantilla, Meligeni and Canas en-route so not exactly poor opponents) and Santoro's at Newport in 2008 very nearly made the 'cut' there, with their highest ranked opponents during those runs ranked at #100.
Can add Hurkacz at Delray from this year to the list,
I don't know if it has been mentioned in the thread before, but Novak hasn't lost to right handed player with a two handed backhand (*edit - at RG) since losing to Coria in 2005 2R (Nadal has lost three since then). Since then he has lost to:
Lefty with 2 handed backhands - Nadal (2006, 2007, 2008, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2020), Melzer (2010)
Righty with a single hander - Kohlschreiber (2009), Federer (2011), Wawrinka (2015), Thiem (2017, 2019), Cecchinato (2018)
It was specifically about Roland Garros.You are wrong. Sam Querrey is a right-hander with a two-handed backhand and defeated Djoker at Wimbledon 2016.
I missed it.It was specifically about Roland Garros.
57 bp's is the record wtf
What it tells us?Djoker was able to show a turn from 0:2 or 1:2 to the sets (from the score with which he would lost in the Bo3 format) in all four Grand Slam tournaments on the way to the title. In total, Djoker won 6 of his Grand Slam titles in this way, he has record in this metric.
AO: Turnover from 1:2 to sets against Murray in the semifinal of 2012 and against Thiem in the final of 2020.
RG: Turnover from 0:2 to sets against Musetti in the 4th round and against Tsitsipas in the final, both in 2021.
Wimbledon: Turnover from 1:2 to sets against Cilic in the quarterfinal of 2014 and from 0:2 to sets against Anderson in the 4th round of 2015.
USO: Turnover from 0:2 on sets against Federer in the semifinal of 2011.
That Djoker is the Earth's Mightiest Warrior.What it tells us?
They played 9 times at RG, 3 times at USO.Djokovic defeated Nadal at Roland Garros more times (2015 & 2021) than at the US Open (2011).
Ostapenko’s outfits.Nadal never winning Miami
Nadal having more success at USO than at AO
Federer winning 0 USO titles after 2008
Djokovic having more succes at Wimbledon that at RG
Murray having no AO titles
Berdych reaching his only Slam final in Wimbledon
Ostapenko’s outfits.
One of the most shocking and embarrassing thing to do for a top tennis player.
Murray &Federer have never played match on clay.
USO no Fedal meeting either ( thanks to Delpo&Djokovic)
One of those odd coincidences.Nice, didn’t know that
Maybe @Mainad knows history(draws) that is behind coincidence of no clay matches between RF &Murray?Murray &Federer have never played match on clay.
USO no Fedal meeting either ( thanks to Delpo&Djokovic)
Partially. But I also think Fognini's game gets a bit oversimplified judging by how highly many rate his talent. He actually has a bad hold% and an average break% on HC, and his break% jumps by 7% on clay, which is more than usual - I think 4-5% is more normal. I think it kinda shows Fognini is a pure clay courter in the sense that even his pure baseline game only really works on clay.Fognini's hold % is as high on clay (71.7%) as HC. I have yet to find another veteran touring pro in the 2000's whose hold game #'s aren't higher on HC. He's one of those rare guys whose favourite surface is what it is not necessarily because it amplifies his strengths but rather coz it obscures his weaknesses.
Partially. But I also think Fognini's game gets a bit oversimplified judging by how highly many rate his talent. He actually has a bad hold% and an average break% on HC, and his break% jumps by 7% on clay, which is more than usual - I think 4-5% is more normal. I think it kinda shows Fognini is a pure clay courter in the sense that even his pure baseline game only really works on clay.
If you wanna find another ridiculous outlier, Isner is 91.0% on clay (#1 all time) vs 91.6% on HC (#3 of all time). This might suggest he must be insane on clay, but his break% is lower on clay (9.8%)than on HC (10.4%)
Now having worse return% on clay than HC is less rare, I think it's pretty reserved for meme clay players
Karlovic falling off less I think is down to s&v basically meaning he doesn't have a baseline game that falls off vs top opponents cause he just always is at the net.Yeah I think I may have been exaggerating a bit, though with an even passable serve he'd be pretty competitive on HC, as 23.9 rgw% is pretty decent. I still think the bigger factor is the nature of the surface not hurting his dog-water serve as much as HC does.
Good example there with Isner. His #'s are just hard to make sense of in general. He's always lumped in with Karlo for obvious reasons, but despite similar bottom-line stats their game break apart in different situations. For one thing, Karlo's service #'s don't budge vs top players, maybe only a 1% decline at most against the top 5/10 whereas Isner's drop 5-8%. That would imply Ivo does better against top players and/or is maybe mentally sturdier...but then you look at their TB records and find Karlo is bang-average while Jisner is one of the biggest TB-overperformers in history. His TB winning % is actually higher than his career W-L %, so the coasting argument doesn’t even really fly. While he’s an anemic 29-77 against the Top 10, he’s still managed to win over half of TB’s played in those matches (53 out of 105). In standard games in those very same matches, he’s 3.1x as likely to get broken (14.2%) as he is to break (4.6%). Fascinating statistical profile.
Another possibly surprising one: there's only a ~1% difference between Djoko and Nadal in career sgw on non-clay despite Djokovic possessing both the stronger serve and stronger baseline game. I think the relatively minuscule difference there is down to Nadal's third-ball forehand being more suited to compiling large hold streaks against the also-rans ('06 Wimby, '10/'13 USO), but that's just my half-baked theory.
Here’s a fun one: Maria Sakkari has won only 1 WTA title in her career 4(!) years ago. Since then she’s become a top 10 regular, yet hasn’t won a title of any level.
Wawrinka is true definition of outlier in tennis, became consistent top 10, 2013 aged 28 ,was there for 4 years, won his 3th career title, first on HC aged 25 before he went to win 2 HC GS.Wawrinka winning more AO’s and RG’s than Murray and winning the same amount of USO’s. Always struck me as strange especially the AO where Murray made like 20 finals and Stan capitalized on his lone finals appearance.