The_18th_Slam
Hall of Fame
Dimitrov has already had his valley... I mean peak.
When will Grigor Dimitrov hit his peak?
- Thread starter kalpab
- Start date
Rusty Shackleford
G.O.A.T.
Dimitrov already hit his peak when he broke into Sharapova's medicine cabinet.
#MeldoniumBestPlaceboEver
#MeldoniumBestPlaceboEver
Rusty Shackleford
G.O.A.T.
Have you peaked already?
BeatlesFan
Bionic Poster
Lousy poll. His "peak" (such as it was) was taking Djoker to five sets in the 2014 Wimbledon. I seriously doubt he'll ever reach a slam semi again.
DerekNoleFam1
Hall of Fame
For a guy that hasn't been past the 3rd Round at RG, he is not exactly a dark horse.
Not like he has big weapons like Stan Wawrinka or all round game of Djokodal.
kishnabe
Talk Tennis Guru
Really....
Both Baseline campers....have an all round game. Just lol.
nolefam_2024
G.O.A.T.
4 sets
West Coast Ace
G.O.A.T.
I would have voted "the year after the last of the Big 3 retires".
Im hoping for @Russeljones prophecies to come true, 18 slams in 5 years
. As a huuuge Federer-fan, nothing would be better than a young one handed backhander to take over the throne
. As a huuuge Federer-fan, nothing would be better than a young one handed backhander to take over the throne
Nostradamus
Bionic Poster
What ?? I was Born peaked
cockneyDjoker
Hall of Fame
2025
serbiavic
Professional
When he can make a masters 1000 final, then we can talk.
Russeljones
Talk Tennis Guru
You just wait and see. You will grilieve one day!Im hoping for @Russeljones prophecies to come true, 18 slams in 5 years
tennisfan2015
Hall of Fame
Young GOAT???
Peak?
Please!
Peak?
Please!
ForumMember
Hall of Fame
He is past his prime already.
D
Deleted member 512391
Guest
Federer hit his at the age of 34, there is still time for Dimi.
cc0509
Talk Tennis Guru
Stop it! He's playing a bunch of nobodies in Istanbul! It means zilch.
Poisoned Slice
Bionic Poster
40-45, he will be a George Clooney style dilf. Not that I'm into that sort of thing.
mikeeeee
Professional
I will take this bet
guanzishou
G.O.A.T.
GRISHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Khaĭde!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238]
[emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238]
[emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520]
[emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520]
[emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519]
[emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519]
Khaĭde!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238]
[emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238] [emoji238]
[emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520]
[emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520] [emoji520]
[emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519]
[emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519] [emoji519]
Last edited:
SpinToWin
Talk Tennis Guru
Smart use of the white GOAT lol
SinjinCooper
Hall of Fame
Very, very, very few players ascend and pass other great players who are still in their primes. When they do, you can feel it happening. There's a palpable feel that there's not so much a changing of the guard (as happens every generation) as an outright revolution. The latter has happened only a handful of times in the Open Era.
Revolution happened with Borg. It happened with McEnroe. It happened with Sampras. It happened with Federer.
Usually, you get the Lendl, Djokovic, Murray, Agassi, etc. model, where they're good players who don't really ascend to the pinnacle until the greats who came before them begin to age and falter.
Dimitrov obviously has no place in that first discussion. There's nothing revolutionary about Dimitrov.
He'll ascend to whatever level he's going to achieve after his olders and betters move on and/or decline. Which they haven't so much as of yet, but given their ages, should be in the next year or so.
Revolution happened with Borg. It happened with McEnroe. It happened with Sampras. It happened with Federer.
Usually, you get the Lendl, Djokovic, Murray, Agassi, etc. model, where they're good players who don't really ascend to the pinnacle until the greats who came before them begin to age and falter.
Dimitrov obviously has no place in that first discussion. There's nothing revolutionary about Dimitrov.
He'll ascend to whatever level he's going to achieve after his olders and betters move on and/or decline. Which they haven't so much as of yet, but given their ages, should be in the next year or so.
DreddyTennis45
Hall of Fame
heninfan99
Talk Tennis Guru
this year
Legend of Borg
G.O.A.T.
can one ever really be considered a good player of their own right if they peaked only when their older rivals whom they couldn't defeat had to retire due to age?
what does it say about grigor that he has to wait for murray/djoko to get old in order to actually win stuff...
Luka888
Professional
Sorry, but who are ' the big 3' nowadays? I guess you were joking.
Is Raonic there?
Similar threads
