Now you're backpedaling and comparing 250 tournaments to Grand Slams. It's easy to expose your rigid way of arguing a point, especially since Federer cared enough to win a mirade of other 250 tournaments in his career. If your point had any value, Federer would not have the record for most 250 tournament wins in his career.
Yes, Federer struggling with mono is a great example.
Too bad it's your only example. What happened to Djokovic at the USO in 2007, 2008 and 2009? Was he destroyed? :lol: 
Yes, Federer struggling with mono is a great example.
Funny how you use "after 2011"; how come prime Djokovic losing to Federer before then doesn't count?
) and even way more exposed by baby Djokovic. That's just how it's.You said Federer didn't care about 250 tournaments at all, then proceeded to compare them to Grand Slam tournaments, now you're backpedaling again and saying he cares about them less than Grand Slam tournaments.
So you're saying that Federer having mono is fiction? Are you seriously saying that?No, mono is a fictitious excuse. Prime Federer was once exposed by Safin on hardcourts(AO-05
Federer barely made it past Tipsarevic, and you're going to tell me he was fine? He was sweating buckets the whole tournament and he looked noticeably sick, unlike the other tournaments he played in 2008.Ask Soderling what's mono and how it affects you. Nobody is perfectly healthy and if Federer was playing the tournament and made it to the semifinals then he was at least OK. And Roger was still in his prime, it was baby Djokovic and baby Nadal who raised the bar in 2008.
Peak Federer wasn't looking dominant at all against baby Djokovic at USO-07 final, no wonder that he was beaten by plexi GOAT, even by baby plexi GOAT
Tipsarevic was a top 8 player, what? 5 years later? Please tell me how this fact is even relevant or how I'm underrating him (or his abilities in 2008, when the best rank he reached was a barely top 40 one) by making this clear-cut statement?
Nadal was terrible and Rosol played the match of his life, that's why he won. It's common knowledge on this forum, and considering Nadal hasn't been past the 4th round since 2012 it explains it well.You just see only half of the bottle...Was Nadal terrible at Wimby 2012 or has Rosol played the match of his life? Even Nadal fans don't deny the fact that Rosol's level during that match was very high, and his 5th set performance was GOAT-level. The same argument goes with Tipsy-Federer match...
Try to see from different perspectives to get a more complete picture instead of looking trough pink Federer's glasses
He lost to Muller in 2005 because he was a grass scrub, lost to Federer in 2006 and 2007 because Federer is the grass GOAT and he's lost during Wimbledon in recent years because he can't even bend down far enough to hit back every shot.
No, I mean greater. Federer is greater and more successful than Djokovic. And Djokovic a late bloomer? :lol: He was winning slams when he was barely in his 20s and has been a top 5 player since the age of 19.AssaultJoker said:
Sampras is grass GOAT, he did it in way tougher grass era. Federer was exposed by Berdych at Wimbledon.
Federer is greater on grass, but Djokovic still got plenty of time to surpass Roger on hardcourts and clay.
A tougher grass era, with what? Pioline in the final? What about career high No. 11 Washington? Give me a break. Federer's faced harsher competition than Sampras did at Wimbledon from at least '96 onward.
The only surface I give Djokovic a legit chance at surpassing Federer on is clay. He's pretty much never surpassing Federer on HC or grass (no way in hell is Djokovic winning 5 USO titles).AssaultJoker said:
No, he deserved to win. I just believe it would be a closer match if Federer was at full health, Djokovic still wins regardless IMO.
Ahahahahahahaha
No one can ever accuse Saby of hiding his true feelings.
He said Djokovic doesn't have a chance of surpassing Fed on HCNo one can ever accuse Saby of hiding his true feelings.
I wonder if he still thinks Novak needs to win 5 USOs to surpass him.He said Djokovic doesn't have a chance of surpassing Fed on HC
 Come to think of it, why don't we ask him.Don't think so. His AO's even it out.I wonder if he still thinks Novak needs to win 5 USOs to surpass him.
@Sabratha: What ya sayin'?
. Back to Federer, his H2H against Simon might look unimpressive, but out of Nadal/Djokovic/Federer, he's the one who played him the less as Nadal has 7-1 H2H, Djokovic 10-1 vs Federer 4-2. Last time I saw Federer play Simon was Shanghai 2014 and he didn't really struggle all that much against him. My guess is that on an off day, Simon can trouble the best. Just look at his match with Djokovic at the AO this year. Simon will always be underrated but at the end of the day, you have to be cautious when playing him.
Fed still has 1 HC major over him though
Won't be that way forever though.
Most likely.
Because Fedr is winning this US Open.
I wish.
The one with past old legends of course.
You'd better bel18ve it.
I prefer to bel13ve myself.
However we know that three guys are a problem for him after the last Wimbledon.
Heresy at its worst.I prefer to bel13ve myself.
Why did you have to do that?!
Sorry, unintentional jinx. Everyone knows I (still) have some sympathy for the Maestro.Why did you have to do that?!
