Wilander: Djokovic's best is better than Nadals and Federers

RF-18

Talk Tennis Guru
“His movement is so good. He knows he is gonna be in pretty much every rally all time,” he said.

“And when his mind is there, focused, there is really no holes in his game.

“He is basically like a human wall.

“Even if he "only" has 14 (Slams), Nadal 17, Federer 20, in terms of the level of tennis being played consistently, I think Novak Djokovic has reached the ultimate.

“Better than Federer at his best, better than Nadal at his best. We have to put it this way.

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/ten...der-tennis-news/amp?__twitter_impression=true
 

davced1

Hall of Fame
Someone needs to force Mats to rewatch Fed's matches from 2004-2007 again.
5mhgsg.jpg
 

TJfederer16

Hall of Fame
Mats has a very short memory, he seems to only go by real time, for example when Roger beat Berdych in the 3rd round of AO 17' he said it was the best performance he'd ever seen from Roger.....
 

davced1

Hall of Fame
Mats has a very short memory, he seems to only go by real time, for example when Roger beat Berdych in the 3rd round of AO 17' he said it was the best performance he'd ever seen from Roger.....
That was a near perfect performance though. The epitome of the new re-invented Federer of 2017.
 

Pheasant

Legend
On the slower courts, especially like the current USO, Wilander is right. However, Federer was untouchable on the much faster courts in the past.
 

norcal

Legend
Joker is the perfect tennis robot (I mean that as a compliment) but anyone who has seen Fed redlining knows he has the highest ceiling. Fed wipes the court with you, at least with Joker feel like you might have a chance lol.
 

BlueB

Legend
“His movement is so good. He knows he is gonna be in pretty much every rally all time,” he said.

“And when his mind is there, focused, there is really no holes in his game.

“He is basically like a human wall.

“Even if he "only" has 14 (Slams), Nadal 17, Federer 20, in terms of the level of tennis being played consistently, I think Novak Djokovic has reached the ultimate.

“Better than Federer at his best, better than Nadal at his best. We have to put it this way.

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/ten...der-tennis-news/amp?__twitter_impression=true
Look at that, Mats turns from a Djokohater to a Djokofan... Temporarily, at least.

Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk
 

maratha_warrior

Hall of Fame
Lol at smug Djokovic fans that think he's undefeatable again.

Reminder that Post Prime Federer took down PEAK Djokovic in Djokovic's best year on Federer's worst surface, denying him the CYGS.

aIWMm.gif

You are using wrong words ...
29 year old Fed was Grandpa Fed in 2011
26 year old Fed was Old federer when he got defeated by Nole and Rafa in 2008..

29 yr old djoker wins RG is at his peak..
29 yr old Federer is Grand pa ;)
 

maratha_warrior

Hall of Fame
Wilander is just glory hunting for now..
Once Fed wins Australian open 2019 ,Wilander will ask Authorities to honour Federer with Nobel Prize ;)
 

Service Ace

Hall of Fame
You are using wrong words ...
29 year old Fed was Grandpa Fed in 2011
26 year old Fed was Old federer when he got defeated by Nole and Rafa in 2008..

29 yr old djoker wins RG is at his peak..
29 yr old Federer is Grand pa ;)

But Baby Djokovic didn't start playing big boy tennis until 2007 so anything before that year doesn't count. Only now has Grandpa Djokovic spent as many years on the tour as Grandpa Fed when 2011 came around.
 

TheAssassin

Legend
Lol at smug Djokovic fans that think he's undefeatable again.

Reminder that Post Prime Federer took down PEAK Djokovic in Djokovic's best year on Federer's worst surface, denying him the CYGS.

aIWMm.gif
He played some of his finest tennis on that surface in that match.
Clay is Djokovic's worst surface as well.

So much for calling others smug.
 

Plamen1234

Hall of Fame
He played some of his finest tennis on that surface in that match.
Clay is Djokovic's worst surface as well.

So much for calling others smug.

Okay Djokovic loss to Federer in 2011 wasnt so bad but him losing to Stan in 4 sets in 2015 when he was at his absolute peak - there is no excuse for that.He should have won that match.
 

maratha_warrior

Hall of Fame
But Baby Djokovic didn't start playing big boy tennis until 2007 so anything before that year doesn't count. Only now has Grandpa Djokovic spent as many years on the tour as Grandpa Fed when 2011 came around.

Rafa or Novak fans hardly call them as old or Grandpa ...
Federer fans are using the Grandpa ,old Man excuses since 2008...
When he was freaking 26 year old :)..

See I am Djokovic fan and i say this Prime Djokovic lost to Istomin at australian open ..
So what ? One match doesn't make Djokovic a Chump ..
Same way 29 yr old Fed plays match of his life and Defeats Nole at RG in 2011 , so he is better like forever ??
If one match decides everything , Nadal is the GOAT .
2008 wimbledon Final ;)
 
Someone needs to force Mats to rewatch Fed's matches from 2004-2007 again.
He did. He watched Federer of that period and wasn't impressed if memory serves me right because Mats believes that Roger was dominating an extremely weak era with Hewitt and Roddick being "rivals" for Fed.
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
But Baby Djokovic didn't start playing big boy tennis until 2007 so anything before that year doesn't count. Only now has Grandpa Djokovic spent as many years on the tour as Grandpa Fed when 2011 came around.

Grandpa Djokovic doesn't exist. You guys can keep those terms. This is still prime Djokovic at 31 years old. :cool:
 

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
Wilander is all over the place so it's hard to take him seriously. He says these things about all 3 at some point or another so it's like...ok whatever
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
In majors, Nadal is 9-3 against Federer and 9-5 against Djokovic. Nadal also has the greatest dominance of a single major.
 

Service Ace

Hall of Fame
Rafa or Novak fans hardly call them as old or Grandpa ...
Federer fans are using the Grandpa ,old Man excuses since 2008...
When he was freaking 26 year old :)..

See I am Djokovic fan and i say this Prime Djokovic lost to Istomin at australian open ..
So what ? One match doesn't make Djokovic a Chump ..
Same way 29 yr old Fed plays match of his life and Defeats Nole at RG in 2011 , so he is better like forever ??
If one match decides everything , Nadal is the GOAT .
2008 wimbledon Final ;)

Djokovic and Nadal fans have been using the Baby, Weak Era excuses since forever.
Federer did not play "the match of his life" in 2011 lol. More excuse making to distract from the fact that PEAK CYGS Contending Djokovic got beat by a run down old man who had been declining since 2007.

One match can decide everything but 2008 was called, "The Greatest Match of All Time" not " The Match FOR Greatest of All Time"
That would be this one:

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...best-ever-showing-tennis-what-it-sorely-lacks
http://www.foxsports.com/tennis/sto...and-slam-best-ever-greatest-goat-match-012917
http://tennismash.com/2017/01/28/fedal-final-the-most-important-ever-says-wilander/
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-...derer-vs-nadal-tipped-as-biggest-ever/8221504
http://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/...ralian-open-trophy-roger-federer-rafael-nadal
http://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/20...set-up-in-the-battle-of-best-ever_a_21702435/
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/...d-be-greatest-match-ever-20170124-gtxy50.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/27/sport/australian-open-tennis-nadal-federer-dimitrov/
https://thefield.scroll.in/828091/t...nally-settled-the-greatest-of-all-time-debate

tc67g0i.png


giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann

Plamen1234

Hall of Fame
Yeah he really made a mess of that, though Stan played amazing to be fair.

Good thing he bounced back so well from that loss.

Yes Stan played really well in this match.Another thing to be noticed is that in 2014-2016 period Stan is the only player who not only troubled Djokovic at Slams but defeated him in 3 out of their 4 their meetings there.Djokovic always have problems with him at GS.Remember AO 2013 epic match and AO 2015 and US Open 2013 - he won these matches but it wasnt easy at all.
 
Top