I beg your pardon? The last time I checked, Nadal didn't have one of the greatest seasons ever in 2006/2007 and was not the best player in the world. Maybe YOU should get your facts straight. Back then, Fed was near his peak and Nadal was getting better and better, so it was somewhat expected back then for Fed to triumph, but considering how in-form and dominate Nadal is today and how little success Fed has had this year compared to previous years, very few should have expected this result. Even the commentators were saying Nadal was going to win after he took the 2nd set due to Fed's mental fragility against Nadal in close matches.
Now Federer will be considered the favourite for AO, no?
Rafa will like this.
True but I hope people realise that if Roger struggles against Nadal on the bh side it's not because the stroke by itself is as weak as people make it out to be but because of the spin and height of the ball.It's very hard to get around that.I recall Sampras talking about this particular problem as well.Even Laver I think has spoken about this re: his matches against..Borg I believe.(correct me if I'm wrong though)
I think Murray should get a good cut of the winner's check.
most of the time his bh breaks down when he has to hit 90% of the time above shoulder level.
I think he showed it in Madrid 09 as wellThat's basically what I was saying. Here, Nadal's spin is pretty much negated and the ball sits up most of the time. Roddick and Murray were having a field day with it at times, even Djoker before he had his problem.
I'd like to see Fed on a court that bounces high to see if he can hang with Nadal's fh. He has shown signs of this in AO 2009 final but most of the time his bh breaks down when he has to hit 90% of the time above shoulder level.
This feels like the end of 2008, except with Fed winning the WTF instead of USO - but generally the same feeling going into the AO where you could say Fed's the favorite because he's back in good HC form..
Ofcourse, don't count out the USO champion.
Thanks!
I love suspense, and I love rivalries. I also think no one player should be winning everything, whether that be Roger, Rafa, or anyone else. The sport needs that unpredictability, to keep the interest. A champion is only as good as the challengers he or she faces.
And yes, it was a dream year for tennis fans overall. Back to back years we have seen a career slam, first Roger and then Rafa. This is great for the sport, but we need to keep parity and some of the other players need to step up and keep things fresh and interesting!
I think Murray should get a good cut of the winner's check.
2006, the year Nadal beat Federer at clay (at least twice, I think) and also the year Nadal beat Federer on a hard-court, my facts are straight, trying to create a petty little argument is going to end in disaster.
You say "I'm a big fan of Roger as anyone", yet you were doubting the chances of him beating a player that Federer is vastly superior to on a hard-court, further more, after comfortably beating Djokovic and Murray, who are both more aggressive and better on a hard-court than Nadal, it should have clicked it in that Federer was playing very well, especially his performance against Djokovic; did you by any chance, watch the match?
Did you watch Nadal's 3+ hour match against Murray yesterday? How could anyone believe Federer wouldn't smoothly dispatch of Nadal if his game was on?
Have some more faith in a player if you're supposedly a "big fan" of his, otherwise it just makes you look vain and frankly, stupid, it's as if you're surprised at Federer, who is arguably one of the greatest hard-court players, at beating Nadal.
One final point, commentators say a lot of things, it doesn't mean they are correct. Using that point does nothing, so for advice for further discussions: completely avoid using it. It does nothing.
Thanks!
I love suspense, and I love rivalries. I also think no one player should be winning everything, whether that be Roger, Rafa, or anyone else. The sport needs that unpredictability, to keep the interest. A champion is only as good as the challengers he or she faces.
And yes, it was a dream year for tennis fans overall. Back to back years we have seen a career slam, first Roger and then Rafa. This is great for the sport, but we need to keep parity and some of the other players need to step up and keep things fresh and interesting!
Everyone knows I'm a Nadal fan, but I would love to see another player lift at least one of the major trophies next year. In 2009, it was really nice to see Del Potro doing superbly at the USO.
To the Rafa and Fed supporters: These 2 guys have won too much now that its almost boring seeing them contend for the major titles every freakin' time. Let's all support Murray next year!
Gooooooooooooo Murray!! Win wimbledon next year, and I hope you beat both Nads and Feds in the process!!
gorgeous,gorgeous boy
Again, instead of me apparently "looking" vain and stupid, you ARE just plain stupid. This isn't an argument. You are just pulling nonsense out of your @$$ now. Being a fan of Fed doesn't mean I expect him to destroy everyone he plays. Obviously you don't follow tennis nor play very much or at least not at any respectable level if you believe that's what being a fan means. There doesn't seem to be any point in countering your points because you obvious have none. I feel sorry for you and your pathetic arguments...and I use that term loosely.
Everyone knows I'm a Nadal fan, but I would love to see another player lift at least one of the major trophies next year. In 2009, it was really nice to see Del Potro doing superbly at the USO.
To the Rafa and Fed supporters: These 2 guys have won too much now that its almost boring seeing them contend for the major titles every freakin' time. Let's all support Murray next year!
Gooooooooooooo Murray!! Win wimbledon next year, and I hope you beat both Nads and Feds in the process!!
Yep. I think both of them should lose at pivotal times to keep their hunger fresh. If you win everything there's no need to improve, and life is about improving, so I'm actually happy (as happy as a Nadal fan can be) Fed won, because those two are heads above everyone else and I don't want to know the outcome before the first ball is struck.
Rafa did better than I expected after taking so much time off, and conversely, Fed did better than I expected playing so much in a couple of weeks. But, in the end they were still the last two standing and one of them had to lose. So...that's it. End of story.
My feelings exactly.
I am a big Rafa fan, I started watching tennis in the late 90's(Agassi fan) but it's been like Fedal only since 2005. We are entering 2011 people, we need new blood.
Both guys have career slam, they have won basically everything(Nadal lacks WTF, Fed DC/Olympic Gold) in tennis and I like them both but it's hard to get excited when he have ANOTHER title that goes to either Fed or Nadal. It kinda seems like overkill.
What I want in 2011 is for Rafa to keep his clay streak. If he can win elsewhere it's all good, if not at least to be in good health.
Everyone knows I'm a Nadal fan, but I would love to see another player lift at least one of the major trophies next year. In 2009, it was really nice to see Del Potro doing superbly at the USO.
To the Rafa and Fed supporters: These 2 guys have won too much now that its almost boring seeing them contend for the major titles every freakin' time. Let's all support Murray next year!
Gooooooooooooo Murray!! Win wimbledon next year, and I hope you beat both Nads and Feds in the process!!
Cyan's doing a pretty good job by herself.I'm just wondering one thing:
Where is veroniquem?
Everyone knows I'm a Nadal fan, but I would love to see another player lift at least one of the major trophies next year. In 2009, it was really nice to see Del Potro doing superbly at the USO.
To the Rafa and Fed supporters: These 2 guys have won too much now that its almost boring seeing them contend for the major titles every freakin' time. Let's all support Murray next year!
Gooooooooooooo Murray!! Win wimbledon next year, and I hope you beat both Nads and Feds in the process!!
Cyan's doing a pretty good job by herself.
I'm just wondering one thing:
Where is veroniquem?
Murray?? Roddick??
No love for Del potro??
1st set: Nadal played well, except for 1 game where he played bad with 4UE including 1 double when Fed broke.
2nd set, Nadal played great,like the world #1, he was totally dominant, controlled most of all the rally's and was aggressive and barely missed, made Fed run everywhere and made him look a bit ordinary.
3rd set, Nadal played well first few games then played really crappy for the rest of the set.