It will probably end in Madrid if not sooner.This streak of Nadal's is going to be one heck of a show. Pity he's going to play Halle, or this streak would go to about 50.
It will probably end in Madrid if not sooner.
Its obviously not going to end sooner than Madrid but its true that Nadal has only won Madrid twice (and one of those was when Madrid was Indoor Hardcourt). Other than that, it will be difficult for anyone to take a set from Nadal at Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Rome, Roland Garros. And Wimbledon is a huge opportunity for Nadal, considering his constant ownership of Murray, Federer's poor form, and the streak Nadal has vs Djokovic. Nadal has won his last 3 meetings vs Djokovic, and will probably have the streak at 6 before Wimbledon begins.
If the draw is based off last year, wouldn't it be Nadal-Djoker in the Quarters?
If the draw is based off last year, wouldn't it be Nadal-Djoker in the Quarters?
I hope so, because that's the only way Nadal gets close to the number one ranking. Nadal-Djokovic QFs at all the masters and Roland Garros and Wimbledon is the best scenario for Nadal, and the worst scenario for Djokovic.
Just was told in the other thread Nadal will be 4th since Fed isn't playing. Doesn't matter, a focused Nadal should win this event
Nope. Monte-Carlo is as slow as you get. Perfectly suited to moonballing tennis.Is there a slower clay surface out there than Monte Carlo?
I hope so, because that's the only way Nadal gets close to the number one ranking. Nadal-Djokovic QFs at all the masters and Roland Garros and Wimbledon is the best scenario for Nadal, and the worst scenario for Djokovic.
Is there a slower clay surface out there than Monte Carlo?
The weather right now is really bad in Monte Carlo, hope it will get better:
http://www.worldweatheronline.com/Monte-Carlo-weather/MC.aspx
Is there a slower clay surface out there than Monte Carlo?
No. If their points are close then you are right. With such a big lead Djokovich has, it only hurts Nadal's climb to no1 by meeting the strongest opponent. I have a feeling the more they play against each other the more likely Djokovich is going to start beating him on clay.
nadal's not going to sweep the clay 1000s season.
Nadal this year has had much better preparation than last year - that damaging 6 hour AO final, and withdrew from Miami semis in pain, and he still only lost at Madrid last year (and that was blue clay which is now extinct).
He's certainly the man to beat, but i think someone will be able to come up with the goods.
Who do you have in mind ? Want to share ?
8 years have passed and Clarky21 still hasn't learnt. :lol:
8 years have passed and Clarky21 still hasn't learnt. :lol:
8 years have passed and Clarky21 still hasn't learnt. :lol:
There are good candidates to pull a surprise* upset:Who do you have in mind ? Want to share ?
I wonder if Djokovic will have to pull out of Monte Carlo with the ankle? A week isn't a lot of time to recover.
I wonder if Djokovic will have to pull out of Monte Carlo with the ankle? A week isn't a lot of time to recover.
Why would he have to pull out of MC? There is nothing wrong with him. I'm sure he will be there and will also win the title.
Well, Cvac comes to mind. Delpo and Murray too. Maybe even Gulbis. There are several guys who can trouble or even beat Nadal on clay.
I can't think of any logical reason to believe he would fake an injury to help him win against Sam Querrey in Davis Cup. I mean, it's just silly. I've never had a serious ankle sprain, but I'm thinking it takes more than a week to feel 100%. I think I'll be surprised if he's able to play.
ankle injuries take more than a weak to be 100%, but depending on the degree of the sprain he could be ready to play within a week.
however, he does a lot of sliding and such, so would need a full range of motion. that could take more than a week.
trouble and beat are two different things (though in the case of Djokovic apparently no one troubles him even when they beat him :lol: )
Gulbis couldn't beat Nadal on HC. Zero chance on clay. Djokovic or Delpo might get the better of Nadal at one clay event coming up, but anything more than that is highly unlikely. 2011 was a one off.
"Djokovic suffered an injury scare when he twisted his ankle in the third game of the match, but was able to continue with painkillers [...] "
No one does really trouble Cvac. He's impossible to beat, especially in best of 5.
And Gulbis has really pushed Nadal hard on clay before in Rome 2010. And that was when Nadal was a much better player than he is now. He has the goods to beat him without a doubt.
2011 was not a one off. Cvac is better than Nadal these days and if he actually shows up he can beat him easily. Delpo can also beat him as well, and has also pushed Nadal hard on clay before. Murray can do some damage too as he has pushed Nadal to 3 sets in MC before.
You people thinking Nadal is just going to mop up the clay season are really getting ahead of yourselves. It's simply not going to happen.
Gulbis was two points away from knocking Nadal out of IW... you guys underestimate him... Rafa doesn't.
Also, Nadal knows how dangerous Gasquet can be... he hasn't forgotten this: http://youtu.be/KzKuv4j67aw
He didn't look injured to me. It's also funny how when he started winning he stopped the faking. He's fine. He will be in MC and will win it.
Don't worry he will play MC....that Hoax injury is to cover up his Miami loss to Haas. Learnt from the best.
How is getting beaten not being troubled? Also, please get a dictionary -impossible means it is not possible. And it obviously is possible to beat him since he lost the last 2 masters, one to a 35 year old with a career of injuries. He's impossible to beat in best of 5 which is why he lost at 3 of 4 slams last year? :lol: meanwhile Nadal wins with ease last year in the clay season and has made 4 finals with 3 wins out of 4 events playe and you're always acting like he's had it so hard
Yeah Gulbis has pushed Nadal on clay. But so what? He won't win. He couldn't even win on HC, ditto for delpo. Murray has no chance. I don' care if they pushed him once. By that logic Wawrinka, Tsonga, Seppi and a load of other people can beat Djokovic.
Yes 2011 was a one off, all years before that and the year AFTER that had Nadal dominating clay season. If djokovic was better than Nadal now, he would be IW champ and not Nadal, and he'd have also won RG last year.
You said the same crap about Nadal not mopping up clay season last year and were of course about as wrong as you could get. Thing is even if Nadal wins everything in clay season for the next 3 years and Djokovic retires tomorrow, all through that you'll still be saying Djokovic will sweep the clay season and Nadal won't win a match.
That makes no sense, the injury happened WHILE playing today, how would that cover up the Miami loss?
Please watch what happened before you start making silly claims: http://http://bit.ly/10FNFiQ
As for MC, Novak apparently said he doesn't know what to say right now, the ankle doesn't look good but he's going to try his best to recover in time for it.
That ankle turn and subsequent injury was no hoax. All you had to do to know that was watch the replay, or expierience it yourself. I did a similar ankle turn and tore ligaments. It is the next 24-48 hours that will tell, not if he injured it, but how badly. Just hope you don't have that " hoax" happen to you.