Just in time.
And haters are still going to call him a mug just to make Nadal's USO draw look worse.
People are constantly calling Roddick a mug even after what he did in 2003.And haters are still going to call him a mug just to make Nadal's USO draw look worse.
He will win slams by default after the Big 3 retire.I doubted his offensive abilities till I watched him pushing Nadal to five sets. His offense is already better than Murray's for instance. He will get better fir sure.
He will win slams by default after the Big 3 retire.
Every match is different. This year he was close. It doesn't mean he will come this close next time.I think he will win Slams beating big 3 in 2020-21. He was very close in his first attempt itself. Cool Head.
It is probable he will get better as most young players do. Also good chance Big 3 will do worse next year as all will be 33+.Every match is different. This year he was close. It doesn't mean he will come this close next time.
He is the best 'young' and Nadal still should've beat him in straights.People are constantly calling Roddick a mug even after what he did in 2003.
Note, I'm not calling Medvedev a mug. I'm actually applauding his effort. He is the best of the young guns.
He is the best 'young' and Nadal still should've beat him in straights.
Medvedev is impressive, but the way Tsitsipas just doesn't have a clue against him says a lot bout Tsitsipas too.
Zverev vs Tsitsipas would be interesting cause while they play so similar, Medvedev has all the clutch and the brains
Yet, Zverev leads 4-0He is the best 'young' and Nadal still should've beat him in straights.
Medvedev is impressive, but the way Tsitsipas just doesn't have a clue against him says a lot bout Tsitsipas too.
Zverev vs Tsitsipas would be interesting cause while they play so similar, Medvedev has all the clutch and the brains
Interesting comment. I may, however, disagree with you.I think it's too late. He could take #1 spot for sure but can't prevent Djokodal fluking Slams here and there. Nadal just needs one more and he seems to have solution to Medvedev' game.
You probably mean Medvedev, right?He is the best 'young' and Nadal still should've beat him in straights.
Medvedev is impressive, but the way Tsitsipas just doesn't have a clue against him says a lot bout Tsitsipas too.
Zverev vs Tsitsipas would be interesting cause while they play so similar, Medvedev has all the clutch and the brains
You are underrating Medvedev a lot. No member of the Big 3 will ever defeat Medvedev in 3 sets in a Slam match, unless it is Nadal at RG.He is the best 'young' and Nadal still should've beat him in 3
He lost 1st round of RG and lost to frigging Goffin at Wimbly.You are underrating Medvedev a lot. No member of the Big 3 will ever defeat Medvedev in 3 sets in a Slam match, unless it is Nadal at RG.
Nadal only failed a volley in the 3th set of the USO final and from that moment Medvedev turned into a robot, hitting clean winners and being a human wall.
Didn't Roddick have like a 1.0 DR at least in every set.Nalbandian should've beaten Roddick in straights in USO 03 SF, who's the mug here? :devi devil:
YesYou probably mean Medvedev, right?
There are always some trolls in every fanbase. Obviously it is a joke to call Roddick a mug. It doesn't mean we should go to the second extreme point and say he was a very strong opponent in all tournaments though. In some tournaments he was, in some not. Same thing about Medvedev. In USO he was a very tough opponent for Nadal, on the other hand in Toronto final he was terrible.People are constantly calling Roddick a mug even after what he did in 2003.
Note, I'm not calling Medvedev a mug. I'm actually applauding his effort. He is the best of the young guns.
Yeah, this is what's so great about what he's doing. Not content to have one big win and spend the next six months admiring himself. Just goes on to the next match and wins that.It's so nice finally seeing consistency out of someone that age.
His best surface is hard court so far. He defeated Djokovic twice this year (even on clay) and tomorrow is about to win his 2nd Master 1000. Not a joke of player.He lost 1st round of RG and lost to frigging Goffin at Wimbly.
Didn't Roddick have like a 1.0 DR at least in every set.
I dunno why but Medvedev doesn't have the feel of an ATG just a solid top 10 player. Tsitsi and Zverev IMO are the ones
Not alone. I think the others are going to step up their games over the next 12 months, though.I think it's too late. He could take #1 spot for sure but can't prevent Djokodal fluking Slams here and there. Nadal just needs one more and he seems to have solution to Medvedev' game.
He is no mug, but we all know that until he wins a slam it simply won't matter what he does in other tourneys. Zverev and Thiem have done what he is doing. Maybe not in the same quick time frame, but very similar.And haters are still going to call him a mug just to make Nadal's USO draw look worse.
Yeah, this is fair. I actually agree with this.He is no mug, but we all know that until he wins a slam it simply won't matter what he does in other tourneys. Zverev and Thiem have done what he is doing. Maybe not in the same quick time frame, but very similar.
Well, in USO he was mentally ready to win the title. He didn't because Nadal outplayed him in the fifth set, not because he choked. This is something we are yet to see from the likes of Zverev or Tsitsipas. But I agree that winning slams is what matters, and we have to see how he will play them in 2020.He is no mug, but we all know that until he wins a slam it simply won't matter what he does in other tourneys. Zverev and Thiem have done what he is doing. Maybe not in the same quick time frame, but very similar.
Zverev has 0 Slam finals. Not comparable to Medvedev at all.He is no mug, but we all know that until he wins a slam it simply won't matter what he does in other tourneys. Zverev and Thiem have done what he is doing. Maybe not in the same quick time frame, but very similar.
While I agree, Thiem and zverev have very comparable accomplishments. Thiem even better, and Zverev is right there. Now level of play is quite different as I agree Med Bear is on another level.Zverev has 0 Slam finals. Not comparable to Medvedev at all.
Thiem was destroyed in the third and fourth set of the RG 2019 final 6-1, 6-1. Medvedev had chances to defeat Nadal. Medvedev is much better than Thiem.
He will be profiteering on the Big Three demise.That includes 1 Slam and 3 masters finals. Last time we saw something like this from young upcoming player was 2011 from Novak DjoKovic. And we know what happened after that. We might be witnessing historical time when next ATG has arrived.
we should remember that Nadal was not even at his 50% best during this final, so if he was playing good then it would have been over in 3 probably 4 sets. That being said he definitely is the best of the new comers.I think he will win Slams beating big 3 in 2020-21. He was very close in his first attempt itself. Cool Head.
No, just no. When Murray actually wanted to play offense he could do it better than Medvedev. Do you see how awkward Medvedev looks when he tries to actually go for his forehand? He practically has to throw his whole body into the shot, and this can't be consistent. Do you see how far back he plays on return? It's almost impossible to play offensive returns from that position. At best he's starting points in neutral. Murray also has much better court sense and recognizes when to play on or inside the baseline to attack. I personally have not really seen this from Medvedev yet.I doubted his offensive abilities till I watched him pushing Nadal to five sets. His offense is already better than Murray's for instance. He will get better fir sure.