Federe 2nd Banana on Clay

Meles

Bionic Poster
Behind Thiem, but ahead of Zverev, Nadal, and Djokovic.

This is based on stats extrapolation that I do often for younger players switching from hard to clay, but useful for guessing at Federer's potential level

For Fed we're going to have to extrapolate the new backhand plus general decline trend on clay:
FedererClay.png


Above is our base line. Without the new backhand what would we expect in 2019 after really three years with little or no clay play? Minimum 68% serve points won (but 2015 was 70%o_O). Return points won probably 37%.

Lets analyze the hard court jump from 2015-2017 jump which is all backhand led.
2015 serverer:
1st Serve Won % 80.5%
2nd Serve Won % 56.1%
1st Srv. Return Won % 34.1%
2nd Srv. Return Won % 50.9%

2017 Federer:
1st Serve Won % 79.2%
2nd Serve Won % 58.9%
1st Srv. Return Won % 32.0%
2nd Srv. Return Won % 51.5%

2019 Federe hard courts:
1st Serve Won % 80.8%
2nd Serve Won % 61.4%
1st Srv. Return Won % 32.1%
2nd Srv. Return Won % 48.9%

So how do we translate this to clay? Looks like little impact overall on first serve recently. 78% first serve points won seems possible on clay, just one percent below the first big Fed serving year on clay in 2009 when he won RG. The progress on 2nd serve on hard courts is just spectacular by Federer from 2015 into 2019. These have been peak numbers. 2015 was one of Fed's best 2nd serve years on clay with the new racket. With the new backhand 2019 likely will exceed his peak which is just stunning. 60% 2nd serve points won would be a goal; beating his best years by 2%.:love:

First return has declined some on hard courts, but maybe on clay it won't be so bad. Probably good for 33% points won which is way down from peak clay years of 37-39%. Courts are fast to start 2019, but the 2nd return numbers still show some of the shakiness from late 2018, so declining slightly too 49%, but no matter as Federe won RG in 2009 with only slightly betterer return numbers.

For 2019 Federer can hit perhaps 70.5-71.5% serve points one; easily a career best on clay. The return could dip to 38%, but enough to break some and Fed may be almost unbreakable on clay.o_O With Nadal and Djoko declined and Thiem the only real obstacle. Fed could win Madrid or Roland Garros. Will be surprised if he's at below 54% points won on clay and career best 55% on the upside. Easily nudges out Zedrot, declined Nadal, and Nole for my 2nd ranked clayerer player in 2019.:eek:
 
I really liked going through this and as much as I joke, I like your reasoned out threads. I think this type of extrapolation/estimation could be very effective, BUT...

Do you think it applies to a player who is a few months shy of his 38th birthday and has not played on clay for multiple seasons? I can’t see it.

All other cases of an established player I can see this being aptly predictive.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Big if true
I think its time for some serious discussion of the following:
1. The bigger racket and impact on Fed's clay game
2. What the new backhand will do on clay?
a. Will it help his first and 2nd serve putting away balls with more first strike tennis?
b. Will it somehow do betterer on clay than it has on hard courts where the Federer first return is in decline?
c. Will it destroy Nadal again?:eek:

Fed's my #2 guy for clay season.:rolleyes:
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
I really liked going through this and as much as I joke, I like your reasoned out threads. I think this type of extrapolation/estimation could be very effective, BUT...

Do you think it applies to a player who is a few months shy of his 38th birthday and has not played on clay for multiple seasons? I can’t see it.

All other cases of an established player I can see this being aptly predictive.
Its guess work to be sure, so the answer is in my post above. I think the new backhand is going to be a first strike weapon on clay. I'm no Federe expert, but if he can put away backhand sitters with aplomb on hard courts its going to be like shooting fish in a barrel on clay.
 

EasyGoing

Professional
@Meles Even though I appreciate the work and find you a very likeable guy with great posts, this one is almost Lew-like - he is explaining the past he never saw with numbers he doesn’t understand, while you are predicting the future with numbers that most probably mean nothing.

My guess is Rog will do extremely well to win even a few matches at Madrid, while a SF would be a remarkable result. At RG I have him at QF stage at best, and I think I am being generous. There is simply no evidence in past history an old guy with a seriously diminished FH can servebot and blast his way past everyone on clay with a “new” BH.

In 2009 he worked hard as hell to win the RG, and I simply can’t see him lasting that long in a match, let alone whole tournament.
He’ll most likely get seriously exposed when the serve gets returned 85% of the time, and resort to ball-bashing and dropshotting. I can even see it turn ugly against good baseliners.
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
What amazes me is that all these Federer Clay threads are all started by fans of other players. They are (bizarrely) acting as if the Roger fans here are going around screaming from the rooftop, "#21 is in the bag!! The GOAT will pummel Rafa on the dirt!!!!"

None of the Fed fans here are expecting anything beyond a QF showing at RG and then only if he's given a gentle draw and no scheduling issues. Most others think a 4R is a possible result and would be fantastic. He's almost 38, the ship has long ago sailed for him on clay as any reasonable fan figured out long ago. Fed fans are just happy to see him play a few matches and keep in the groove for grass season.
 

Ann

Hall of Fame
Love Federer but @Meles despite all the work you've done there's no way Fed beats Thiem or Djoker on clay unless when they play him when they have leg cramps, hangovers and just had their pupils dilated.

Zverev I believe he has an outside chance to beat.
 

ChrisRF

Legend
What amazes me is that all these Federer Clay threads are all started by fans of other players. They are (bizarrely) acting as if the Roger fans here are going around screaming from the rooftop, "#21 is in the bag!! The GOAT will pummel Rafa on the dirt!!!!"

None of the Fed fans here are expecting anything beyond a QF showing at RG and then only if he's given a gentle draw and no scheduling issues. Most others think a 4R is a possible result and would be fantastic. He's almost 38, the ship has long ago sailed for him on clay as any reasonable fan figured out long ago. Fed fans are just happy to see him play a few matches and keep in the groove for grass season.
Mostly I really like your posts, but I remember we disagreed a lot about Federer on clay in the last 2 seasons. I wanted him to play and you not.

And now I have a feeling you (and the other Federer fans you mention) somehow want his decision (not playing) and your opinion about it to be correct in retrospect. That’s why you exaggerate his underdog role big time.

I don’t see any reason why he should be worse on clay than anywhere else. His problem was Nadal and nothing else back then. In 2015 he reached the Rome final (where he lost to Djokovic) and lost to peak Stanimal at RG. The only real bad RG loss was against Gulbis in 2014, but he also lost to Seppi at AO, Stakhovsky at Wimbledon and Robredo at US Open some day.

You say he is too old for clay, but honestly, he should be too old for everything in tennis and just doesn’t care and keeps on winning. Miami showed he was really good in long rallyes again.

I would never say he will definitely win RG, but your opinion is the other extreme here. I mean, how would R16 be "fantastic"? That would only mean he would beat 3 players up to rank 25 before. That would hardly be fantastic, and Federer winning RG should even be more likely than him losing in R32 or earlier, especially when we consider how bad some of the favourites play at the moment.
 
Lol, the expectations of the Federer fans on this site, about his performance in this clay season are through the roof.:eek:
Winner of Madrid and RG.:laughing::laughing: Lol
The ruins will be spectacular i sense in a few weeks time. :-D:D
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
@Meles Even though I appreciate the work and find you a very likeable guy with great posts, this one is almost Lew-like - he is explaining the past he never saw with numbers he doesn’t understand, while you are predicting the future with numbers that most probably mean nothing.

My guess is Rog will do extremely well to win even a few matches at Madrid, while a SF would be a remarkable result. At RG I have him at QF stage at best, and I think I am being generous. There is simply no evidence in past history an old guy with a seriously diminished FH can servebot and blast his way past everyone on clay with a “new” BH.

In 2009 he worked hard as hell to win the RG, and I simply can’t see him lasting that long in a match, let alone whole tournament.
He’ll most likely get seriously exposed when the serve gets returned 85% of the time, and resort to ball-bashing and dropshotting. I can even see it turn ugly against good baseliners.
Rookie handwringerer.

It’s all draw in my mind. Federe’s form in the last month >>>>>>>>>>>> Djokodal. Plus the untried backhand. Thiem at RG too much, but Fed might even beat Thiem in Madrid.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Lol, the expectations of the Federer fans on this site, about his performance in this clay season are through the roof.:eek:
Winner of Madrid and RG.:laughing::laughing: Lol
The ruins will be spectacular i sense in a few weeks time. :-D:D
Some crazy picks by some, but most are in hiding; it was the same before 2017 Auz. Something is very wrong with Nadal. Pick your poison as to what, but it’s open season on clay.:eek:
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
The good news: Federer wins the French, cementing @Meles as the greatest poster this website has ever seen, his bold predictions and beautifully laid out Melesian Math being proven right yet again.

The bad news: He beats Thiem to do it, dishing out a bagel in the process, thus ending The Diamond Age forever. Meles never returns to the website.
Unadulterated fantasy. Fed needs someone else to do the Thiem dirty work at RG. I’ll be looking good If Djokodal stink up Madrid. We’ll know soon.:p
 

IowaGuy

Hall of Fame
I think its time for some serious discussion of the following:
1. The bigger racket and impact on Fed's clay game
2. What the new backhand will do on clay?
a. Will it help his first and 2nd serve putting away balls with more first strike tennis?
b. Will it somehow do betterer on clay than it has on hard courts where the Federer first return is in decline?
c. Will it destroy Nadal again?:eek:

Fed's my #2 guy for clay season.

Fed will lose 1st or 2nd round at French Open to some 20-something, unseeded claycourt grinder such as Garin, Berrettini, Munar, PCB, RCB, etc. in a grueling 4 hour match that wears out the old man :)
 
So much wasted time on statistics to compare a player that has won nothing of significance on a surface that doesnt matter to a player that has won things of significance on a surface that doesnt matter

Have we divided by zero yet
 

Ann

Hall of Fame
Lol, the expectations of the Federer fans on this site, about his performance in this clay season are through the roof.:eek:
Winner of Madrid and RG.:laughing::laughing: Lol
The ruins will be spectacular i sense in a few weeks time. :-D:D
No.

We hope he wins but we don't think he has a shot. I would be delighted if he makes it to the QF and most Fed fans would agree.

Try again because this post was an epic fail.
 

EasyGoing

Professional
Mostly I really like your posts, but I remember we disagreed a lot about Federer on clay in the last 2 seasons. I wanted him to play and you not.

And now I have a feeling you (and the other Federer fans you mention) somehow want his decision (not playing) and your opinion about it to be correct in retrospect. That’s why you exaggerate his underdog role big time.

I don’t see any reason why he should be worse on clay than anywhere else. His problem was Nadal and nothing else back then. In 2015 he reached the Rome final (where he lost to Djokovic) and lost to peak Stanimal at RG. The only real bad RG loss was against Gulbis in 2014, but he also lost to Seppi at AO, Stakhovsky at Wimbledon and Robredo at US Open some day.

You say he is too old for clay, but honestly, he should be too old for everything in tennis and just doesn’t care and keeps on winning. Miami showed he was really good in long rallyes again.

I would never say he will definitely win RG, but your opinion is the other extreme here. I mean, how would R16 be "fantastic"? That would only mean he would beat 3 players up to rank 25 before. That would hardly be fantastic, and Federer winning RG should even be more likely than him losing in R32 or earlier, especially when we consider how bad some of the favourites play at the moment.

I am sorry, but this post is just plain wrong. If you see no reason why old players that heavily rely on their serve shouldn’t do worse on clay than elsewhere, then you simply haven’t been paying enough attention.

Besides, R16 is exactly what Rog did in his last two slams - US Open and Melbourne - and just one off his last performance at Wimbledon. Nadal’s form and the form of other favorites are the last of his concerns.
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
Mostly I really like your posts, but I remember we disagreed a lot about Federer on clay in the last 2 seasons. I wanted him to play and you not.

And now I have a feeling you (and the other Federer fans you mention) somehow want his decision (not playing) and your opinion about it to be correct in retrospect. That’s why you exaggerate his underdog role big time.

I don’t see any reason why he should be worse on clay than anywhere else. His problem was Nadal and nothing else back then. In 2015 he reached the Rome final (where he lost to Djokovic) and lost to peak Stanimal at RG. The only real bad RG loss was against Gulbis in 2014, but he also lost to Seppi at AO, Stakhovsky at Wimbledon and Robredo at US Open some day.

You say he is too old for clay, but honestly, he should be too old for everything in tennis and just doesn’t care and keeps on winning. Miami showed he was really good in long rallyes again.

I would never say he will definitely win RG, but your opinion is the other extreme here. I mean, how would R16 be "fantastic"? That would only mean he would beat 3 players up to rank 25 before. That would hardly be fantastic, and Federer winning RG should even be more likely than him losing in R32 or earlier, especially when we consider how bad some of the favourites play at the moment.
I think she is a pessimistic Fed fan who plays down expectations beforehand. I can tell because that's what I do. That said, I really think even beginning to think of Fed as an RG contender when he hasn't even been playing RG for a few years now and had increasingly mediocre results when he was is way too optimistic. I am not going to write off Nadal either. He along with Djokovic and Thiem are my favourites for RG.
 

ChrisRF

Legend
I am sorry, but this post is just plain wrong. If you see no reason why old players that heavily rely on their serve shouldn’t do worse on clay than elsewhere, then you simply haven’t been paying enough attention.

Besides, R16 is exactly what Rog did in his last two slams - US Open and Melbourne - and just one off his last performance at Wimbledon. Nadal’s form and the form of other favorites are the last of his concerns.
Come on, you talk about him as if he’s someone like Stepanek in his last years on tour. Just look at how he rallyed with a guy like Medvedev at Miami (on a court similar slow as clay) and you’ll see how good he still is in any aspect of the game.

I think many of those who write him off will be surprised in the next weeks. You forget that last year he had a hand injury which hindered him from hitting good forehands. That’s why he lost to Anderson and Millman (Tsitsipas was really great though, I give that to him).

Also as I said his clay results until 2015 were not that bad (2016 doesn't really count on any surface). Moreover Federer didn’t skip clay because he feared the exhaustion but rather a sudden injury.
 

falstaff78

Hall of Fame
Behind Thiem, but ahead of Zverev, Nadal, and Djokovic.

This is based on stats extrapolation that I do often for younger players switching from hard to clay, but useful for guessing at Federer's potential level

For Fed we're going to have to extrapolate the new backhand plus general decline trend on clay:
FedererClay.png


Above is our base line. Without the new backhand what would we expect in 2019 after really three years with little or no clay play? Minimum 68% serve points won (but 2015 was 70%o_O). Return points won probably 37%.

Lets analyze the hard court jump from 2015-2017 jump which is all backhand led.
2015 serverer:
1st Serve Won % 80.5%
2nd Serve Won % 56.1%
1st Srv. Return Won % 34.1%
2nd Srv. Return Won % 50.9%

2017 Federer:
1st Serve Won % 79.2%
2nd Serve Won % 58.9%
1st Srv. Return Won % 32.0%
2nd Srv. Return Won % 51.5%

2019 Federe hard courts:
1st Serve Won % 80.8%
2nd Serve Won % 61.4%
1st Srv. Return Won % 32.1%
2nd Srv. Return Won % 48.9%

So how do we translate this to clay? Looks like little impact overall on first serve recently. 78% first serve points won seems possible on clay, just one percent below the first big Fed serving year on clay in 2009 when he won RG. The progress on 2nd serve on hard courts is just spectacular by Federer from 2015 into 2019. These have been peak numbers. 2015 was one of Fed's best 2nd serve years on clay with the new racket. With the new backhand 2019 likely will exceed his peak which is just stunning. 60% 2nd serve points won would be a goal; beating his best years by 2%.:love:

First return has declined some on hard courts, but maybe on clay it won't be so bad. Probably good for 33% points won which is way down from peak clay years of 37-39%. Courts are fast to start 2019, but the 2nd return numbers still show some of the shakiness from late 2018, so declining slightly too 49%, but no matter as Federe won RG in 2009 with only slightly betterer return numbers.

For 2019 Federer can hit perhaps 70.5-71.5% serve points one; easily a career best on clay. The return could dip to 38%, but enough to break some and Fed may be almost unbreakable on clay.o_O With Nadal and Djoko declined and Thiem the only real obstacle. Fed could win Madrid or Roland Garros. Will be surprised if he's at below 54% points won on clay and career best 55% on the upside. Easily nudges out Zedrot, declined Nadal, and Nole for my 2nd ranked clayerer player in 2019.:eek:

Love the analysis.

Before I feel comfortable in the extrapolations it would be good to see some measure of strength of competition for each year. (I typically look at ave rank faced, and % of matches v top 20)

But yeah assuming there is nothing crazy going on with strength of competition in any of the years, and given that he will be playing at his two best clay events, we could see something in the region of 62% 1st srvs, 78% first srv win%, 60% second srv win% = 71% service points won. This translates into a hold rate of 91%.

one thing to keep in mind is that clay is freaking grueling and that will hurt Federer on the return game more than the service side.

Love the fact that you have a "clutch" line in each chart.
 
The good news: Federer wins the French, cementing @Meles as the greatest poster this website has ever seen, his bold predictions and beautifully laid out Melesian Math being proven right yet again.

The bad news: He beats Thiem to do it, dishing out a bagel in the process, thus ending The Diamond Age forever. Meles never returns to the website.

:eek:

Alternate ending: Federer plays brilliantly all tournament, but is stopped by an in-form Thiem in the SF.

Awaiting Thiem in the championship match?

17aab5.gif

It's the only way this clay season could get any wackier.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Good trolling @Meles

Unfortunately for you the Fed fan base is a sharp one and will not fall for this

Forget what happened 2013-16 on clay ?? It is not a surface for 38 year old to slug out baseline rallies and Fed’s game revolves around his serve for a long time now . He will be exposed on clay and I will be happy if he makes a QF or SF, just to get some form and points .

Pretty sure Fed is not playing for a title or a final . He is not one to lie as to what his targets are . Have we heard him say he is playing for a big run ???
Typical fraudulence:unsure:; Deny the new racket and the new backhand. Did Fed say he'd win 2017 Auz Open? No, just tricksome Meles had him in the final.;)
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
So much wasted time on statistics to compare a player that has won nothing of significance on a surface that doesnt matter to a player that has won things of significance on a surface that doesnt matter

Have we divided by zero yet
Haha you seem to be always dividing by Zero; so suddenly Djokoray are fearsome to you and Fed on fire at Miami not real?
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Love the analysis.

Before I feel comfortable in the extrapolations it would be good to see some measure of strength of competition for each year. (I typically look at ave rank faced, and % of matches v top 20)

But yeah assuming there is nothing crazy going on with strength of competition in any of the years, and given that he will be playing at his two best clay events, we could see something in the region of 62% 1st srvs, 78% first srv win%, 60% second srv win% = 71% service points won. This translates into a hold rate of 91%.

one thing to keep in mind is that clay is freaking grueling and that will hurt Federer on the return game more than the service side.

Love the fact that you have a "clutch" line in each chart.
That chart is pretty loosey goosey by Ultimate tennis stats standards now that they show things like 69.49% points won on serve with much greater detail than ATP. I'm not too concerned about opponents faced as length of clay season The typical fraudulent denierer will not admit racket change and backhand change having significant impact on ancienterer's game, so you're one of the good ones.:p
 

oldmanfan

Legend
Love Federer but @Meles despite all the work you've done there's no way Fed beats Thiem or Djoker on clay unless when they play him when they have leg cramps, hangovers and just had their pupils dilated.

Zverev I believe he has an outside chance to beat.

Don't worry Ann. I've predicted that Fedr will win RG19 without facing any of Nadalovic and the ensuing TTW servers crashing.
Clay Vulterer.
I'm okay with that :D.
 

yokied

Hall of Fame
Perhaps you have little clue how much more grueling clay court tennis is than HC or grass. This clip will perhaps let you understand why Fed will not win RG or make a dent on clay at nearly 38:


And that is why the Fog's laziness and effectiveness needs to be immortalised with victory at RG. He's probably not fit enough to even play a semi, let alone the rest, but I will keep dreaming that his approach will someday be richly rewarded.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
......

So how do we translate this to clay? Looks like little impact overall on first serve recently. 78% first serve points won seems possible on clay, just one percent below the first big Fed serving year on clay in 2009 when he won RG. The progress on 2nd serve on hard courts is just spectacular by Federer from 2015 into 2019. These have been peak numbers. 2015 was one of Fed's best 2nd serve years on clay with the new racket. With the new backhand 2019 likely will exceed his peak which is just stunning. 60% 2nd serve points won would be a goal; beating his best years by 2%.:love:

First return has declined some on hard courts, but maybe on clay it won't be so bad. Probably good for 33% points won which is way down from peak clay years of 37-39%. Courts are fast to start 2019, but the 2nd return numbers still show some of the shakiness from late 2018, so declining slightly too 49%, but no matter as Federe won RG in 2009 with only slightly betterer return numbers.

For 2019 Federer can hit perhaps 70.5-71.5% serve points one; easily a career best on clay. The return could dip to 38%, but enough to break some and Fed may be almost unbreakable on clay.o_O With Nadal and Djoko declined and Thiem the only real obstacle. Fed could win Madrid or Roland Garros. Will be surprised if he's at below 54% points won on clay and career best 55% on the upside. Easily nudges out Zedrot, declined Nadal, and Nole for my 2nd ranked clayerer player in 2019.:eek:
Let's check under the Federe hood after Thiemination in Madrid:
-2nd serve points won was 57.3%, but not bad given rough early opponent in Thiem and was 63% before that match. Federe's career best clay season around 58%, so not bad at all.
-2nd return points won was 54.7% which is beyond belief considering the fast conditions in Madrid. Goat 2nd return numbers show the new backhand is working great on clay.

So the backhand is working and here is the overall picture:
Return points won 36.51% in Madrid which is just fine in those fast conditions and Thiem a fellow serve leaderer
Serve points won 70.12% in Madrid not fantastic for Madrid and a number to watch, but still Federe over his career best of 69% points won for 2009 clayerer season.:love:

Federe still my number 2 player on clay behind Thiem and we could easily see peak Federer numbers for the season and seems quite possible he may play Rome given his draw is betterer.

More tea leaves @Gary Duane , but all signs point to yes for peak clayerer in 2019, which is amazing.
 

EasyGoing

Professional
What is the new backhand that we're talking about? I'm not watching Madrid, someone please?

It’s the same BH as before, mixed in with some worse slices. What people should really talk about when discussing Roger on clay is the FH, or rather the lack of it.
 

EasyGoing

Professional
Let's check under the Federe hood after Thiemination in Madrid:
-2nd serve points won was 57.3%, but not bad given rough early opponent in Thiem and was 63% before that match. Federe's career best clay season around 58%, so not bad at all.
-2nd return points won was 54.7% which is beyond belief considering the fast conditions in Madrid. Goat 2nd return numbers show the new backhand is working great on clay.

So the backhand is working and here is the overall picture:
Return points won 36.51% in Madrid which is just fine in those fast conditions and Thiem a fellow serve leaderer
Serve points won 70.12% in Madrid not fantastic for Madrid and a number to watch, but still Federe over his career best of 69% points won for 2009 clayerer season.:love:

Federe still my number 2 player on clay behind Thiem and we could easily see peak Federer numbers for the season and seems quite possible he may play Rome given his draw is betterer.

More tea leaves @Gary Duane , but all signs point to yes for peak clayerer in 2019, which is amazing.

You are a really funny guy and I love reading your posts, but the conclusions that you make are just beyond belief.

Serve points won vs Thiem: 70 (on a 72% 1st serve!)
Return points: 27

Monfils excluding the brain fart bagle as an outlier:
Serve points won vs Monfils set 2/set 3: 60/71
Return points won vs Monfils: 38/40

Serve points won vs Gasquet: 73
Return points won vs Gasquet: 40

“Peak Clayerer” resorting to S&V even on the 2nd serve and desperate dropshotting to protect the peak baseline game and BH peppering. His game is as peak as his hair
 
Lol, the expectations of the Federer fans on this site, about his performance in this clay season are through the roof.:eek:
Winner of Madrid and RG.:laughing::laughing: Lol
The ruins will be spectacular i sense in a few weeks time. :-D:D

Meles is a Fedr hata.

You are mad again.

:cool:

P.S. How am I doing with the language of the new generation?
 
Top