Lleytonstation
Talk Tennis Guru
When the big 3 leave, there will be a massive fallout in interest and the tour will become dull. Now this is assuming that a few of these younger guys dont eventually figure it out in the next few years. But it wont matter if they dont show it against an aging big 3. While I will still follow the tour (I will enjoy the tour even when the big 3 leave, just less), it will need to be improved and updated to reinvigorate not only new fans but old ones as well.
A way I see them doing this is in a scheduling overhaul. While it should not be done all at once, or even during the big 3 slam race, they can get started and plan out the changes now. I see a schedule that looks something like this in 2025:
What this schedule will do is space out tourney better, keep things localized and compartmentalized by surface. Also, gives a more equal surface distribution while still acknowledging hard courts is the main surface. It also gives a bigger off season.
Obviously you would like to slowly move around masters over the next 5 years instead of making one big change. The tourney directors may benefit from this in the long term as well. But something will need to be done to spice things up after the big 3.
Maybe even count the "Sunshine Slam" as a real slam count, or simply give an extra 500 points?
Thoughts? Do they need to overhaul the schedule when the big 3 leave, or should they just do it now? What would you do if you were the master scheduler?
Big 3 response:
A way I see them doing this is in a scheduling overhaul. While it should not be done all at once, or even during the big 3 slam race, they can get started and plan out the changes now. I see a schedule that looks something like this in 2025:
2025 ATP Schedule
- Early to mid January- ATP CUP --later start to season so that there is more off-season
- Late January- AO --get the season started off with a hard court tease
- Early March- Monte Carlo (masters) --go straight into clay but with a nice break
- Late March- Madrid Open (masters) --better spacing then now
- Mid April- Italian Open (masters) --better spacing then now
- Early May- FO --starts about two weeks earlier
- Mid June- Queens Club (masters) --finally grass masters with adequate spacing
- Late June- Navient Open (masters) --finally grass masters with adequate spacing
- Mid July- WC --starts two weeks later
- Mid August- Montreal (masters) --USO warm-ups
- Late August- Cincy (masters) --USO warm-ups
- Mid September- USO --much better weather while no risk of cold
- Early October- IW (masters) --still good weather and lumped with HC season
- Mid October- Miami (masters) --still good weather and lumped with HC season
- Early November- Shanghai Indoors (masters) --Make it fair for the tour points, play both masters indoor and WTF's indoor and in different time zones so competition is not an issue
- Early November- WTF's --Make it fair for the tour points, play both masters indoor and WTF's indoor and in different time zones so competition is not an issue
What this schedule will do is space out tourney better, keep things localized and compartmentalized by surface. Also, gives a more equal surface distribution while still acknowledging hard courts is the main surface. It also gives a bigger off season.
Obviously you would like to slowly move around masters over the next 5 years instead of making one big change. The tourney directors may benefit from this in the long term as well. But something will need to be done to spice things up after the big 3.
Maybe even count the "Sunshine Slam" as a real slam count, or simply give an extra 500 points?
Thoughts? Do they need to overhaul the schedule when the big 3 leave, or should they just do it now? What would you do if you were the master scheduler?
Big 3 response: