which one?@Dartagnan64 btw, I’m picking up a phantom 93p so i’ll be able to compare it with my modded Clash.
which one?@Dartagnan64 btw, I’m picking up a phantom 93p so i’ll be able to compare it with my modded Clash.
Guess you didn’t read my Clash review posted in this thread on Saturday?which one?
I meant which 93P, not which Clash.Guess you didn’t read my Clash review posted in this thread on Saturday?
Lol. Sorry. 18x20.I meant which 93P, not which Clash.
Hit with one of my clash tours for a bit now. Played a doubles league match, practiced and drills so a mix of hitting.
Previous racket: volkl 10 295 customized to 12 oz, 4hl, 333-335SW
New racket: clash tour, overgrip, 2.5 total grams at 3 & 9 o'clock, no dampener, 8 HL, 338 grams total with lead and overgrip - SW is a total guess but probably around 328 give or take a bit. 16g multi mains 54lbs, 17g still smooth co-poly cross 50lbs
groundstrokes: very comfortable - I really like the feel for topspin and under-spin groundstrokes. Depth and power are easier to achieve than with my old racket. very solid feel but still can feel the flex. I have been playing 40 years and this racket plays a bit like the old rackets that had more flex but it still feels modern and powerful. I am not experiencing any launch angle issues that others talk about. In fact, I find control with this frame to be very good.
volleys: this racket volleys very well. I think the little extra weight I added helps with depth and blocking balls back. If I make clean contact, there's a lot of pep coming off the stringbed resulting in crisp volleys that slide and stay low. the 100" head helps a little vs my 98" inch head. Yea, I know 2" isn't much difference but I think it has a bit more pep and a bigger sweet spot.
Serves: I am serving better with this frame than my previous frame or with other rackets I demo-ed recently (yonex ezone 98 and ezone 100, volkl 10 vfeel 295). my clash T is 8 HL with a decent SW so I think I have better control of the racket head. Serves have just a bit more pop and placement is better too.
Spin: I am getting a little more spin on all my shots than with my previous volkl or the other demo rackets. Difference is slight but if you stroke pattern is good for spin generation, you'll get good spin out of this frame.
Feel: plush and comfortable
Overall: I think this is a very good racket. I personally prefer it much more than the stiffer 100" heads like bab ap, bab pd, volkl vfeel 9. I also like it better than the yonex ezone or vcore line. I am really not getting the launch angle criticism at all. I have hit with it a good 10-15 hours now and find ball control to be very good. for me, this is like a players thin beam racket with a bit more pop while maintaining control. but, give it a go and see for yourself. I think Wilson did a really good job on this and the soft flex alone is innovative enough to warrant a demo.
I started at 52/50 which is higher than my usual tensions to account for tension loss due to grommet seating in. Plan to go lower when I restring. Also plan to switch from 1.25 to 1.28 or 1.30.This reflects my experience as well. With ALU 16 40# was too low and 50# too tight. I settled on 44! [emoji471][emoji462][emoji471]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Wow that's cool to know. (Btw in terms of testing this sounds like a proper experiment in that you have the control group - PS- and the variable Clash!) Reckon atmosphere/temp has got to have an effect on everything (but majorly on the player! haha)
So what do you think the cold is actually doing to the material. Making it flex more or less? More because you are leaving ball shorter?
Temps were in the low 50s on Saturday night and almost 80 on Sunday. I didn’t notice my Clash performing differently at these 2 temps.Tough to say. My guess is the Clash may rely on some resiliency to do it's thing, like a rubber band, it flexes at impact and reacts by sort of snapping back into shape. These are all terrible analogies, I know.. When it gets cold, it stiffens and loses that resiliency. IF it is truly reliant on that compression and expansion, It would be affected more by temperature than a standard racquet. ..
I agree with that. And it is what makes discussion so difficult to understand, since everybody has his/her own reference points.
I'll most likely wait for the 98 head size Clash Tour. That one should be more controllable. I think that one is available in June? If someone has a more firm date please let me know.I hit with a demoed Clash Tour for two different sessions. Normally I never hit with a racquet less than 12 ounces so I placed one strip of 1/4" wide lead all through the top of the hoop from about 10 o'clock to 2 o'clock bringing the total weight to 341 ounces (12 ounces) including dampener and over grip. My usual racquet of choice is the RF Auto and the latest Blade 16X19 CV which I also lead up to 12.25 ounces.
I played two sets with my Blade and won the first set 6-1 and lost the second in a tie breaker. Then I took out the Clash for a quick hit. Both myself and my hitting partner right away could easily see the extra spin and velocity the ball had coming off the Clash. My Blade seemed way underpowered versus the Clash. I couldn't miss with my forehand but my backhands would sail long. Even flat forehands were very controllable. However, at the end of the session I decided that the Clash was most likely too erratic and too powerful. But I did not give up........
Two days later I hit only with the Clash against another opponent and won the only set we played 6-2. When my power game is working for me I dominate from the baseline. I wait for a weak return and then either go for the winner or hit an approach shot. Often times when my opponent retrieves my shot they will lob the ball within a foot of the baseline. This can be frustrating as it's difficult to hit winners that deep with the Blade. However, with the Clash I was able to hit outright winners from baseline from lobbed balls. In addition, I changed my two handed backhand to hit more topspin. The result was some thunderous returns of serve that left my opponent shaking his head. So in conclusion, I was much more impressed with the capabilities of the Clash after my latest hitting session. The only drawback that still remains is I don't have a good sense of feel or touch on finesse shots. Some of my lobs went way out of court because of this. Perhaps this is because I just need to get used to the different feedback this racquet provides? That feedback issue might be the Clash's achilles heel. Not sure if it's a show stopper though. I played with the Wilson Revolve poly strings that the demo was shipped with. Perhaps a thinner gauge poly might provide more feedback? Well it's a $250 guess......hmmm. But TW supposedly has a guarantee so what the heck?
Depending upon the weather, I'll probably have at least another hit with the Clash Tour before I ship it back and then I'll make my decision.
Right, but control/power/feel appreciation will differ if you usually play a Pure Drive or a Blade.@OlivierJulienB I'm actually finding the discussions here totally fascinating as there is an absolute abundance of data points with different setups which should help immensely in painting a clearer picture of the characteristics and behaviour of this very unique racquet.
Is that the regular Clash or Tour version? How easy was it to hit flat instead of top spin looping shots?I can’t believe I’m saying this but I’m playing rather well with it. It’s easy to hit a deep consistent ball with lots of arch if you want. Returns are stellar. Still finding my rhythm on the serve, but if this continues on clay come summer, I have an investment to make. It is so comfortable. I actually find it more comfortable than my Storms believe it or not (not more flexible in feel, mind you, more comfortable).
I have the prototype version with what looks like a Wilson Featherthin grip and 3g at 12.
I can’t believe I’m saying this but I’m playing rather well with it.
Think of my poor wallet man!You almost sound disappointed. LOL
You remember wrongly I’m afraidIs that the regular Clash or Tour version? How easy was it to hit flat instead of top spin looping shots?
I might have remembered wrongly, but were you playing with the Dunlop CX200 Tour before this?
*looked at signature*You remember wrongly I’m afraid
I guess it’s the regular version. Flat works well IMO, that’s why I like it on the return. Much less of that vertical launch I sometimes get with stiffer tweeners which makes flatter strokes go long. To be clear though: flat means a topspin shot with low trajectory. Not a no-spin-slap-the-ball shot.
Hm. I think you can do it with weight in the hoop. Won’t be as good as a hefty dense string-patterned frame though, no matter what you do. So if I’m gonna be hitting hard flat winners for a living I’d still go for my Storm Limited+ or Prestige MP XL.*looked at signature*
Oh yeah you're the that plays with extended length sticks
I guess I need to word it better. When I said flat I meant hit a lower trajectory winner shot as opposed to loopy high trajectory stay-in-rally shot.
Same here!I am accustomed to tight 18x20s like the Ultra Tour and prestige mp. String patterns don’t get much tighter than these and still get very good control from the Clash. I only lose a little bit of precision on groundstrokes.
Which part of Georgia?Sorry,
I'm not sure I understand what you are asking.
Yes! One of my racquets was leaning against a backboard and fell to the asphalt/blacktop and that resulted in two small chips.Has anyone had chipping paint problems with their Clash? I demoed a couple at my club and they all look pretty beaten up even though they have only had them for a couple of months. A lot worse than normal wear and tear. Anybody else notice this?
It’s hard sometimes to tell the difference between flexible and flimsy.Yeah . Cause only 7 people would have bought it at 12 oz . That’s what’s the best part of this . Like pros hair pins it comes to you as a platform low weight .. You can weight it as you deem fit
I applaud Wilson for flexible and light . I’ve been screaming for this for years . No more buying 26 juniors with high flex and low weight . And extending it to 27. Which is what I had to do ..
now while we are talking about why Wilson won’t do ? This or that ?
I would love a clash 95 or 90
With a 18x20 pattern ! Love !! Me and 7 other people !
Has anyone had chipping paint problems with their Clash? I demoed a couple at my club and they all look pretty beaten up even though they have only had them for a couple of months. A lot worse than normal wear and tear. Anybody else notice this?
Nice detailed review!Tried, liked, picking up two.
You mean it wasn’t clear from his detailed, comprehensive review?Clash or Tour version?
Clash or Tour version?
Let me know how this setup goes on the clash tour, as this was my string setup for my blade cv
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I played with the 98 yesterday. The flex was very noticeable and nice.
How did you come across a 98? Is it heavier than the Tour? Is the string pattern 16x19 or 18x20?
Funds to develop Clash-themed racquet bags got diverted to marketing...The 98 is listed in the SS19 Wilson catalog online. 310g unstrung, 30.6mm / 11pts HL balance and a slightly thinner beam (24mm vs 24.5 on the 100). It is the only 98 in the catalog but there is also a Clash 100L and 108. It was also odd to me that the matching Clash line of bags in the catalog was only 2 sizes of duffle and a Junior backpack. There weren't any Clash specific standard style larger bags listed in there.
Actually, they are still perfecting the characteristics of the bags such that they will be both hard and soft to the touch, depending on how you handle them.Funds to develop Clash-themed racquet bags got diverted to marketing...
Actually, they are still perfecting the characteristics of the bags such that they will be both hard and soft to the touch, depending on how you handle them.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Finally! Doraemon's 4D pocket!The bags are so flexible that they fold down to pocket size, yet can hold 2 tons of material inside.
It doesn’t flex if you aren’t trying to hit hard. As you hit harder, the flex incrementally increases and is very pronounced when you crush the ball. I’m actually having a tough time hitting the ball long. Everything just seems to drop in. The faster and harder I swing, the more spin the racquet seems to impart on the ball.Ok ok so here is the skinny .. so as luck I got mine strung with my personal string choice .
It’s just not all that flexible boys . Not really .
I don’t feel the flex much at all if any on fH
Bh a bit .
Balls are sending long and high .
If I try to drive it she’s at the fence .
The clash is 3.0 ladie killer though ! My 3.0 / 3.5 ladies teams have never played better in their lives !
True statement
I got the regular Clash so can’t help with any mod recs on the Clash Tour....what are some of the recommended modification you guys tried to make it a really likable stick ?