If you want something close to the 2022 Speed Pro consider the 18x20 Tour 100p, either this generation or the 2015 version that have lower RA.Looking at the specs on TW, the Tour 98 is exactly a Speed Pro 2022 in a 98' package. Same weight, same balance, same SW, same beam width, same stiffness... Only the string pattern differs and yet I think the spacing might not be that different. I'm ordering one right now!
Thanks but I'm looking more for a 97/98' and this new tour 98 ticks all the boxes.If you want something close to the 2022 Speed Pro consider the 18x20 Tour 100p, either this generation or the 2015 version that have lower RA.
If you want something close to the 2022 Speed Pro consider the 18x20 Tour 100p, either this generation or the 2015 version that have lower RA.
I just always recommend the 2015 or 2022 Prince Tour 100p to those who like the 2022 Head Speed Pro because their specs are very similar:I thought the Extreme Tour was the baby Speed Pro.
I just always recommend the 2015 or 2022 Prince Tour 100p to those who like the 2022 Head Speed Pro because their specs are very similar:
22 Head Speed Pro:
100 sq in
18x20 string pattern
11.5 ounce strung weight
6 pts head light
326g swing weight
62RA
23/23/23beam
2015 Prince Tour 100p:
100 sq in
18x20 pattern
11.5 ounce strung weight
7 pts head light
321 swing weight
62RA
22/23/20mm beam
2022 Prince Tour 100p:
100 sq in
18x20 pattern
11.4 ounce swing weight
7 pts head light
322 swing weight
61RA
22/23/20mm beam
I don’t think any 98 inch 16x19 racquet would be close the ‘22 Speed Pro. Certainly not closer than the Tour 100p is.
That's why I said baby.
The Extreme Tour has a very tight pattern. It's really only Extreme in name.
I was just referring to how the Extreme Tour is really more along the Speed lines than Extreme. And it would be the baby of the line.
That would be the Head Prestige MP 2021.maybe make the beam a 21 or 22 mm flat beam (or at least 22mm at the tip), and the string pattern 18x19
Actually it is other way around, because Speed Pro was 315 gram in the past. They changed it later. Tour 98 is just a Tour 100 with little tweaks.Looking at the specs on TW, the Tour 98 is exactly a Speed Pro 2022 in a 98' package. Same weight, same balance, same SW, same beam width, same stiffness... Only the string pattern differs and yet I think the spacing might not be that different. I'm ordering one right now!
That would be the Head Prestige MP 2021.
Sorry, this whole time I was saying speed pro. I meant Speed MP. I see the ET more like a baby Speed MP.I find the G360+ ET to have a higher launch angle and to be less precise than the G360+ SP. I find the ET to be better/more natural on serve (especially the second serve), to be better at picking up low balls (due to the higher launch angle), and I find that it's good on flattening out shots... but not as good as the SP.
It would be great if Head did put out a Speed version that was 98 (maybe call it Speed Tour, or change the Speed Pro to 98 and rename the current version of Speed Pro to Speed Tour), maybe make the beam a 21 or 22 mm flat beam (or at least 22mm at the tip), and the string pattern 18x19.
Sorry, this whole time I was saying speed pro. I meant Speed MP. I see the ET more like a Speed MP.
I need to schmoke less...geziz.
How can Speed MP more maneuverable than Tour 98 when it is 4HL vs 6HL. Plus Tour 100 is 7HL and Tour 95 9HL... So for you 5 points in balance is no different????I have been hitting with a demo of the Tour 98 this weekend from my local Canadian retailer and not sure what all the fuss is about. It is a nice racket and does everything fairly well, but nothing outstanding, and there are a lot of outstanding rackets out there these days. Speaking of the Speed MP, which I am currently using, I find that the MP is more maneuverable, more powerful, has just as much control (8 mains in the throat) as the 98 and in an all round easier to use package. Not to mention the new auxetic tech is easier on my arm. I was really looking forward to this since I used to play with the tour 95 a few years ago and thought the 98 would be more like it, but it is more like the tour 100, which I never got along with.
Published specs don’t tell the whole story. QC is all over the place with every brand, even Yonex.How can Speed MP more maneuverable than Tour 98 when it is 4HL vs 6HL. Plus Tour 100 is 7HL and Tour 95 9HL... So for you 5 points in balance is no different????
For me the key here is most 98 racquets are 4HL like Pure Strike, TF 40, Whiteout etc while Prince is doing sth more headlight which is better for advanced players or those who are not ballbashers but allcourters.
How can Speed MP more maneuverable than Tour 98 when it is 4HL vs 6HL. Plus Tour 100 is 7HL and Tour 95 9HL... So for you 5 points in balance is no different????
Can you compare TT 98 with Ezone 98 ?Very simple: Speed MP frame is more aerodynamic, goes through the air faster = more maneuverable. My observations are based on playing with both rackets not by looking at specs.
I have been hitting with a demo of the Tour 98 this weekend from my local Canadian retailer and not sure what all the fuss is about. It is a nice racket and does everything fairly well, but nothing outstanding, and there are a lot of outstanding rackets out there these days. Speaking of the Speed MP, which I am currently using, I find that the MP is more maneuverable, more powerful, has just as much control (8 mains in the throat) as the 98 and in an all round easier to use package. Not to mention the new auxetic tech is easier on my arm. I was really looking forward to this since I used to play with the tour 95 a few years ago and thought the 98 would be more like it, but it is more like the tour 100, which I never got along with.
Which model are these?They completed my matching service and these are the results:
#1: W: 309.36g Bal: 31.1cm (10 pts HL) SW: 292
#2: W: 310.54g Bal: 31.1cm (10 pts HL) SW: 292
I really like these numbers, static weight is close, balance and SW is identical. Hopefully they get shipped out in the next day or two. Although my free bundle still says “waiting” lol.
Which model are these?
Ah, did you ask for customization? These seems to be heavier and more headlight than listed spec.Oh sorry, it’s for the 98, I’ll update the post.
Ah, did you ask for customization? These seems to be heavier and more headlight than listed spec.
Ah, did you ask for customization? These seems to be heavier and more headlight than listed spec.
3 grams - 2 g plastic in the handle + 1 g strings holding the placard. Also take off 2 g from the rubber overgrip holder above the grip and you lose 5 g from the measured static weight to take you to 305 g unstrung. Probably raises the balance point closer to the hoop.
Well, for rackets at this weight I would prefer 5 HL strung. With these spec they’re probably gonna end up 7 HL strung. Look forward to your feedback.What he said lol, TW does tell you that the plastic on the handle weighs 2.25. I did not do any customizations, just the matching service.
98 should've been flat beam.I have been hitting with a demo of the Tour 98 this weekend from my local Canadian retailer and not sure what all the fuss is about. It is a nice racket and does everything fairly well, but nothing outstanding, and there are a lot of outstanding rackets out there these days. Speaking of the Speed MP, which I am currently using, I find that the MP is more maneuverable, more powerful, has just as much control (8 mains in the throat) as the 98 and in an all round easier to use package. Not to mention the new auxetic tech is easier on my arm. I was really looking forward to this since I used to play with the tour 95 a few years ago and thought the 98 would be more like it, but it is more like the tour 100, which I never got along with.
I have been hitting with a demo of the Tour 98 this weekend from my local Canadian retailer and not sure what all the fuss is about. It is a nice racket and does everything fairly well, but nothing outstanding, and there are a lot of outstanding rackets out there these days. Speaking of the Speed MP, which I am currently using, I find that the MP is more maneuverable, more powerful, has just as much control (8 mains in the throat) as the 98 and in an all round easier to use package. Not to mention the new auxetic tech is easier on my arm. I was really looking forward to this since I used to play with the tour 95 a few years ago and thought the 98 would be more like it, but it is more like the tour 100, which I never got along with.
A little update on the Tour 98 playtest. First day i tried it indoors on hard with new balls and extremely low tension (estimated 35 lbs) and the frame felt really great! Day 2 i strung it with Signum Pro Poly Plasma hextreme at 48 lbs and the balls was pretty worn. Colder weather (15 degrees celsius) and play outside on clay. It was a totally different story this time and the frame felt more like a Prestige 600. I had a hard time finding the groove with the frame. I had an old Aeropro Drive in the bag as well and got so much more out of the session when i used that frame instead.
So a word of advice is that the Tour 98 should be tried the first time with very very low tension.
I had to call and ask to ship the racket without the back ordered gift. It sped up the process and is getting it shipped. Check your status and see if that’s the case for you.Come on.... Ship already
A little update on the Tour 98 playtest. First day i tried it indoors on hard with new balls and extremely low tension (estimated 35 lbs) and the frame felt really great! Day 2 i strung it with Signum Pro Poly Plasma hextreme at 48 lbs and the balls was pretty worn. Colder weather (15 degrees celsius) and play outside on clay. It was a totally different story this time and the frame felt more like a Prestige 600. I had a hard time finding the groove with the frame. I had an old Aeropro Drive in the bag as well and got so much more out of the session when i used that frame instead.
So a word of advice is that the Tour 98 should be tried the first time with very very low tension.
I'll try this tomorrow. ThanksI had to call and ask to ship the racket without the back ordered. It sped up getting it shipped. Check your status and see if that’s the case for you.
I haven't played anything but Prince long-term, but I can try to compare to demos I've done in the past. Take with a grain of salt, since I never played for an extended time with them.@c-had
nice feedback, thank you for sharing.
I wonder how "low powered" it is. maybe I should go a couple lbs lower with tension!
is it blade power? what other frames can you compare it with other than prince?
I'm so sorry. I haven't touched a prince frame since 1995.
Cheers
Yes, the feel is very different between the old and new 310. Part of that is that the new one feels a good bit softer. Hitting them back-to-back make me really notice the jarring shock in my wrist on off-center hits in the 2019 (which I generally consider to be fairly comfortable). But also they just feel different. I don't know that I can explain it well, but it seems like having the racquet flex in different parts just gives the racquet a different feel. I imagine some folks will really like the new feel, and others may prefer the old.@c-had
What is the comfort and feel compared to TT 310 2019 ? Is there a big difference between the old and new TT310 ?
Make of it what you will. From TW's comments on their YouTube promo video:
Q: "Michelle: How does the ATS Tour 98 compare to the new Ezone 98… Their specs are identical in many categories…. They are very similar, at least on paper. You liked the Ezone 98… but you love the Tour 98…"
A: "First I would say the feel of Yonex racquets and Prince racquets are different as well as their headshapes. I gravitate toward the shape of the Prince Tour 98 (and am more familiar withit) and would say the EZONE feels a bit more muted vs. the Tour 98. Then from there I would just comment that the Tour 98 feels a bit more comfortable, stable and offers a bit more plow through. It just feels better in my hands and I feel more confident with it in my hands -- some of it I can't necessarily put into words (but hope that makes sense!)
Michelle, TW"
Q: "How does this racket compare to the yonex vcore pro and ezone line of rackets?"
A: "We found the power level to be fairly close to the EZONE 98, but with a bit more feel and responsiveness to the Tour 98. So maybe not quite a mix of the two, but somewhere in between, leaning closer to the easy power of the EZONE 98. Troy, TW"
Q: "How would this compare to blade 98 16x19 v8?"
A: "This Tour 98 is similar as far as the weight, headsize, and fairly close in avg swingweight. That said, this one packs a bit easier punch, or power, with the thicker beam up in the hoop. The Blade 98 16x19 v8 is a bit more control oriented overall. We found the power level of this Tour 98 to be a bit closer to the EZONE 98. Troy, TW"
Q: "how is the power level compared to the synergy 98 and ezone 98?
A: "We would say pretty close the EZONE 98, but provides easier power to the Synergy 98. The Synergy 98 feels a bit lower in power, closer to like a VCORE Pro, or Blade 98. Troy, TW"
Q: "How does this racquet compare to the Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19?"
A: "This Prince ATS Tour 98 provides a bit easier access to power. The Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19 has a slightly firmer feel, and offers a bit more control. Both racquets offer pretty good spin potential. Troy, TW"
Make of it what you will. From TW's comments on their YouTube promo video:
Q: "Michelle: How does the ATS Tour 98 compare to the new Ezone 98… Their specs are identical in many categories…. They are very similar, at least on paper. You liked the Ezone 98… but you love the Tour 98…"
A: "First I would say the feel of Yonex racquets and Prince racquets are different as well as their headshapes. I gravitate toward the shape of the Prince Tour 98 (and am more familiar withit) and would say the EZONE feels a bit more muted vs. the Tour 98. Then from there I would just comment that the Tour 98 feels a bit more comfortable, stable and offers a bit more plow through. It just feels better in my hands and I feel more confident with it in my hands -- some of it I can't necessarily put into words (but hope that makes sense!)
Michelle, TW"
Q: "How does this racket compare to the yonex vcore pro and ezone line of rackets?"
A: "We found the power level to be fairly close to the EZONE 98, but with a bit more feel and responsiveness to the Tour 98. So maybe not quite a mix of the two, but somewhere in between, leaning closer to the easy power of the EZONE 98. Troy, TW"
Q: "How would this compare to blade 98 16x19 v8?"
A: "This Tour 98 is similar as far as the weight, headsize, and fairly close in avg swingweight. That said, this one packs a bit easier punch, or power, with the thicker beam up in the hoop. The Blade 98 16x19 v8 is a bit more control oriented overall. We found the power level of this Tour 98 to be a bit closer to the EZONE 98. Troy, TW"
Q: "how is the power level compared to the synergy 98 and ezone 98?
A: "We would say pretty close the EZONE 98, but provides easier power to the Synergy 98. The Synergy 98 feels a bit lower in power, closer to like a VCORE Pro, or Blade 98. Troy, TW"
Q: "How does this racquet compare to the Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19?"
A: "This Prince ATS Tour 98 provides a bit easier access to power. The Tecnifibre TF40 305 16x19 has a slightly firmer feel, and offers a bit more control. Both racquets offer pretty good spin potential. Troy, TW"