P_Agony
Banned
So why did Nadal retire against Murray if he was NOT injured? Last time I checked Nadal FINISHES matches as much as he can. Did you forget the bagel against Murray in Rotterdam '09 when Nadal was hobbling? How come Nadal did NOT retire in the match?
Truth is Murray OUTPLAYED Nadal in the AO 2010 QF and was on course towards winning the match in straights. Nadal got injured in the late 2nd/early 3rd set - so he decided not to risk any further harm given his shaky injury record and slam withdrawals thereof.
Was Nadal injured ? YES
Did the injury affect the outcome of the match? Not in the least. Murray was far away the better player.
Why is that so difficult to accept?
Nadal was NOT injured. He had BPs the game before, he almost broke, and when he couldn't, he just quit with a supposed injury.