captainbryce
Hall of Fame
Indoors are usually faster surfaces with a lower bounce. Generally his success is largely dependent on having a slower surface with a higher bounce, or having a relatively weak draw, or it being one of the few times during the year he is not injured. All three of those things happening for him is like catching lightening in a bottle.It's true that Nadal had strong prime results everywhere bar indoors. His out-of-prime results are remarkably poor, though. You'd think if he's such an unparallelled champion, he should have found a way to retain competitiveness when handicapped.
The one time he did exceptionally well on a fast surface was at the 2010 US Open where he was serving over 130 miles per hour. But the US Open is the one slam where the speed changes damn near every year. The Australian Open has been like molasses since 2008 (the year Djokovic started winning it), and Wimbledon has been slowed since 2002. Andre Agassi is really the only baseliner that has ever won Wimbledon when it actually played like fast, low bouncing grass. Winning a career grand slam isn't the feat that it used to be since all the surfaces are basically homogenous now.
https://www.google.com/amp/news.nat...ut-eliminated-place-for-specialty-players/amp