Where are you, rafa and roger??

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
We seriously need you guys to shut down this medvedev hype train...
All it might take is the AO20. This amazing run by Med Bear is awesome, but it means very little unless he starts winning slams. An early loss or another loss to the big3 in the later rounds will slow this hype.

If he is for real, he will show it at AO20. If not... then he falls back in the Thiem, Zverev category. I mean come on, if he is as great as we say he is, and has improved like his results show, he should win the AO against an aging big3.
 

Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil

Talk Tennis Guru
wind-up-8147.gif
 

James P

G.O.A.T.
All it might take is the AO20. This amazing run by Med Bear is awesome, but it means very little unless he starts winning slams. An early loss or another loss to the big3 in the later rounds will slow this hype.

If he is for real, he will show it at AO20. If not... then he falls back in the Thiem, Zverev category. I mean come on, if he is as great as we say he is, and has improved like his results show, he should win the AO against an aging big3.
It would be great if he won it, but I'd be pretty happy with a SF or better in AO2020.
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
It would be great if he won it, but I'd be pretty happy with a SF or better in AO2020.
It would be nice for the tour. But a SF wont cut it. Not at this point. It would be regression to be honest. A final keeps him about where he has been. But a SF would slow the hype and the "next gen" jokes would continue.
 

topher

Hall of Fame
We seriously need you guys to shut down this medvedev hype train...

Nadal is getting married and about to be world #1. Not to be confused with the dubious title of “Future #1”, a title Medvedev just stole from Tsitsipas, who stole it from Zverev, who stole it from Thiem.

Which isn’t to be confused with “Future Future #1”, a title FAA stole from Shapovalov, who got it from Tiafoe, who took it from Ryan Harrison or Donald Young or somebody.

Roger is zeroing in on slams and knows #3 vs 4 makes no difference there.
 

topher

Hall of Fame
It would be nice for the tour. But a SF wont cut it. Not at this point. It would be regression to be honest. A final keeps him about where he has been. But a SF would slow the hype and the "next gen" jokes would continue.

I don’t really agree, who else among the nextGen has made consecutive slam SFs? Med has them beat between the ears, me thinks.
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
I don’t really agree, who else among the nextGen has made consecutive slam SFs? Med has them beat between the ears, me thinks.
Yes, it is definitely good compared to what we have seen. But Thiem made 4 SF in a row at the FO and two finals. Won a master's as well and beaten the big3. Zverev has done the same but even better, just not at the slams.

While a SF or final is good, it is not going to be anything other than baby steps. He won't win the French or WC, so we have to wait another year for him to breakthrough and win a slam?

Guys need to win slams at age 23 against 33+ years olds to live up to the hype of a potential future "ATG."
 

James P

G.O.A.T.
Yes, it is definitely good compared to what we have seen. But Thiem made 4 SF in a row at the FO and two finals. Won a master's as well and beaten the big3. Zverev has done the same but even better, just not at the slams.

While a SF or final is good, it is not going to be anything other than baby steps. He won't win the French or WC, so we have to wait another year for him to breakthrough and win a slam?

Guys need to win slams at age 23 against 33+ years olds to live up to the hype of a potential future "ATG."
Yeah, definitely agree, but I was just talking about the SF in AO2020 earlier. I fully expect him to win a slam next season at some point. The only one that seems impossible in current form is RG. He has three strong shots next year.
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
Yeah, definitely agree, but I was just talking about the SF in AO2020 earlier. I fully expect him to win a slam next season at some point. The only one that seems impossible in current form is RG. He has three strong shots next year.
I would say 2. But if he wins AO, then his confidence will be out of this world, and we know what that can do for players.
 

topher

Hall of Fame
Yes, it is definitely good compared to what we have seen. But Thiem made 4 SF in a row at the FO and two finals. Won a master's as well and beaten the big3. Zverev has done the same but even better, just not at the slams.

While a SF or final is good, it is not going to be anything other than baby steps. He won't win the French or WC, so we have to wait another year for him to breakthrough and win a slam?

Guys need to win slams at age 23 against 33+ years olds to live up to the hype of a potential future "ATG."

I’m not saying he will be a ATG after a SF appearance, I’m saying in two generations of players who are happy to lose, Med keeping an idgaf attitude and backing it up with a second consecutive slam SF will continue my feeling that he is not just another NextGen “let’s just wait until the better players get old” type.
 
D

Deleted member 763691

Guest
Rafa beat Medvedev 63 60 at Canada Masters 2019.
Rafa beat Medvedev in 5 Sets at US Open 2019 but bare in mind Rafa led 2 sets to love and up a break in the 3rd Set!
I have to like Rafa's chances of beating Medvedev in straight sets at Paris Indoors and World Tour Finals :)
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
I’m not saying he will be a ATG after a SF appearance, I’m saying in two generations of players who are happy to lose, Med keeping an idgaf attitude and backing it up with a second consecutive slam SF will continue my feeling that he is not just another NextGen “let’s just wait until the better players get old” type.
But if not now? When? I just think he has shown he can and should be winning slams after this run. Now we need to see how he finishes the year, but at this point, you can only win slams to move up. The better plays have been old for a while now.

I simply see a SF appearance as regression. Have to do more than that against a weak young field and a 33+ ATG field.
 

guitarra

Professional
All it might take is the AO20. This amazing run by Med Bear is awesome, but it means very little unless he starts winning slams. An early loss or another loss to the big3 in the later rounds will slow this hype.

If he is for real, he will show it at AO20. If not... then he falls back in the Thiem, Zverev category. I mean come on, if he is as great as we say he is, and has improved like his results show, he should win the AO against an aging big3.
I agree. I also think the pressure on Medvedev at AO will be pretty big. Especially if he adds 1 or 2 more titles in 2019. Let’s wait and see how he handles it. Judging by his on court interviews and celebrations he seems like he is mentally prepared to go all the way. But is he really? And will he do it?
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
All it might take is the AO20. This amazing run by Med Bear is awesome, but it means very little unless he starts winning slams. An early loss or another loss to the big3 in the later rounds will slow this hype.

If he is for real, he will show it at AO20. If not... then he falls back in the Thiem, Zverev category. I mean come on, if he is as great as we say he is, and has improved like his results show, he should win the AO against an aging big3.
Zverev has 0 Slam finals, unlike Medvedev. So no, Medvedev is much better than Zverev. It is an insult to objectivity to compare Medvedev with Zverev.
 

King_ Zeglan12

Professional
Rafa and Roger can only meet Medvedev in the SF/F of the remaining events..
For the time being, we can be sure of Medvedev making the date as Rafa (rusty) and Federer (not in good form) are not guarantees.
 
D

Deleted member 763691

Guest
He means Federer is done finished kaput!
Done like a two dollar hooker :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DSH

octobrina10

Talk Tennis Guru
He should be at home.

He's almost married.

This is the last weekend to enjoy his single life. The club, where Rafa partied, seems to be a great place:

 
Rafa did his job twice this year regarding trying to stop Medvedev hype train.
It's still not stopped.
He needs to do it again, just like he did in Canada & new york this year & roger in Miami earlier this season..
One more 6-3 6-0 or 6-4 6-2 is required (uso could very well be 6-4 6-3 6-4 if bull didn't turn sheet)
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
Didn't he just beat the guy who is the subject of the this thread in his last 2 finals?
1) barely
2) first Slam final for Medvedev and he played like dogS in the first 2 sets, the fact that he got so close to winning after being 0-2 down is a near miracle
3) broke in the 5th set after a lucky rally
4) Medvedev's health questionable, Wawrinka should've put that QF match to bed

Not to mention Nadal had a joke draw to get to the final so he was fresh

So basically same old.It's been well established that Nadal can only beat injured, tired opponents or absolute waiters at the US Open.
 
Yeah, definitely agree, but I was just talking about the SF in AO2020 earlier. I fully expect him to win a slam next season at some point. The only one that seems impossible in current form is RG. He has three strong shots next year.
If he doesn't find new weapons especially in terms of upping the firepower considerably in areas of ballstriking from both wings, I'm more than sure that the tour will figure him out in the break time & then will tell him to shut his phuck up as a small kid who doesn't know how to fight...
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
1) barely
2) first Slam final for Medvedev and he played like dogS in the first 2 sets, the fact that he got so close to winning after being 0-2 down is a near miracle
3) broke in the 5th set after a lucky rally
4) Medvedev's health questionable, Wawrinka should've put that QF match to bed

Not to mention Nadal had a joke draw to get to the final so he was fresh

So basically same old.It's been well established that Nadal can only beat injured, tired opponents or absolute waiters at the US Open.
giphy.webp
 
Nadal is getting married and about to be world #1. Not to be confused with the dubious title of “Future #1”, a title Medvedev just stole from Tsitsipas, who stole it from Zverev, who stole it from Thiem.

Which isn’t to be confused with “Future Future #1”, a title FAA stole from Shapovalov, who got it from Tiafoe, who took it from Ryan Harrison or Donald Young or somebody.

Roger is zeroing in on slams and knows #3 vs 4 makes no difference there.
I'm starting a countdown before the medvedev puzzle gets solved.. (fedal have already solved it but won't share the keys ofcourse)
 

aman92

Legend
1) barely
2) first Slam final for Medvedev and he played like dogS in the first 2 sets, the fact that he got so close to winning after being 0-2 down is a near miracle
3) broke in the 5th set after a lucky rally
4) Medvedev's health questionable, Wawrinka should've put that QF match to bed

Not to mention Nadal had a joke draw to get to the final so he was fresh

So basically same old.It's been well established that Nadal can only beat injured, tired opponents or absolute waiters at the US Open.
1. Destroyed him in Montreal and would have won in straights at the USO if he hadn't missed a simple volley in the third
2. Again, both players showed a very high level throughout the match, the fact that he came back from 2-0 down shows his mental fortitude and tactical awareness.
3. Nadal broke twice in the fifth set..
4. Medvedev has reached 6 straight finals, is 23. Never once did I see him fatiguing, it was Nadal who was running out of stamina towards the end.

So basically all your points are pure BS
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
Zverev has 0 Slam finals, unlike Medvedev. So no, Medvedev is much better than Zverev. It is an insult to objectivity to compare Medvedev with Zverev.
I get what you are saying, I truly do. However, if you look at their resumes, Zverev has 4 big titles (3 masters on two surfaces and a WTF on indoors). Med Bear has 2 all on one surface and all this summer.

While a final is massive, it does not earn him anything. Yes, we can see the light at the end of the tunnel for Med Bear and not quite yet for zverev. That being said, Med Bear is older and Zverev might produce the same at his age.

One slam is really all that separates these two in overall resumes. Plus, Med has only done it on one surface.

So while yes, Med Bear has shown more, they are comparable. Slams? Zero for both.
 

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
1. Destroyed him in Montreal and would have won in straights at the USO if he hadn't missed a simple volley in the third
2. Again, both players showed a very high level throughout the match, the fact that he came back from 2-0 down shows his mental fortitude and tactical awareness.
3. Nadal broke twice in the fifth set..
4. Medvedev has reached 6 straight finals, is 23. Never once did I see him fatiguing, it was Nadal who was running out of stamina towards the end.

So basically all your points are pure BS
Omg Warrior Nadal had to be at his very very best to beat golden Medvedev, what a champion, what a warrior. Humbalito shows the world that he's the GOAT. I can't I can't even
 
Top