Hc easily. Djo has straight set him 6 times on clay.
Exactly there is no comparison. Djokovic owns him.Straight sets (without tie-break) in every major clay tournaments. 6-3 6-3 in Monaco, 7-5 6-4 in Madrid, 6-4 6-4 in Rome, 7-5 6-3 6-1 in RG (+ 2 other in Monaco 2013 and Rome 2016)
Where are Nadal's straight sets wins in Australia, Miami, Canada, Cincinnati, USO, Shanghaï and Paris? Only HC straight-set wins were in IW2007 and WTF2007, during Nole's first months in the top-10 (and one in a meaningless half dead rubber round robbin in 2010)
Bunch of Mickey Mouse and bunch of wins in 2014-2016 during Rafa’s off years. Prime for prime, 2-2 at HC slams and 5-0 on clay for Rafa. Slam dunk.Oh dear lord. Here we go again.
Beijing 2013 2-0
ATP Finals 2013 2-0
Miami 2014 2-0
Beijing 2015 2-0
ATP finals 2015 2-0
Doha 2016 2-0. IMO This is the best thrashing of all time 6-1 6-2
IW 2016 2-0
AO 2019 3-0
ATP cup 2020 2-0
So a total of 19 sets won in a row. Djokovic ended him on HC. On clay even before 2011 Djokovic at least was competitive. Nadal has been non competitive for a decade now. Some would say, Nadal will never be a threat to him ever again.
Prime to prime:Slam is tricky, on clay Nole is Rafa's biggest competitor, but on HC many bigger competitors for Nole.
Nole-Rafa 5 HC slam matches all in Finals, 4 of them Nole had 5-set max wear down in SF, the only exception is AO19, and it was a beat down.
Prime to prime:
6-0 in clay slams for rafa
3-2 in hc slams for Djokovic (being generous including 2019 AO)
Slam dunk. Lol at including bejjing and Doha Mickey Mouse wins vs 15-16 crapdal.
pardon? Fed was most dominant of the big 3 at 3/4 slams at his peak. djokovic did the best in his 30s vs Mickey Mouse opponents trueDon't invite embarrassment for Fed.
pardon? Fed was most dominant of the big 3 at 3/4 slams at his peak. djokovic did the best in his 30s vs Mickey Mouse opponents true
2015 Nadal a legit win cus “top 5”, LOL.when in top5 no bs excuse.
I could ask the same thing about clowns who try to claim djokovic was more dominant on hc than Nadal on clay based on some bo3 wins vs 2015-2016 crapdalShameful hater in this thread. Why does Federer have such people? Just too old and bitter guessing.
Why stop nowDid all these djokovic stans just get out of bed? Don't y'all got anything better to do than talk about the same mundane things every day?
Bunch of Mickey Mouse and bunch of wins in 2014-2016 during Rafa’s off years. Prime for prime, 2-2 at HC slams and 5-0 on clay for Rafa. Slam dunk.
Beijing, Doha, ATP cup, LOL. Hc slams is 3-2 Djokovic, 2-2 prime to prime. Rg h2h is like 5-0 prime to prime. It’s a slam dunk.
I could ask the same thing about clowns who try to claim djokovic was more dominant on hc than Nadal on clay based on some bo3 wins vs 2015-2016 crapdal
In Beijing and doha
pardon? Fed was most dominant of the big 3 at 3/4 slams at his peak. djokovic did the best in his 30s vs Mickey Mouse opponents true
ok we can count bothI find it hilarious you count USO 2010 but not AO 2019 lol.
Or that you count 2007 for RG.
That's a problem with Djoker fans. They ignore the different weigh of each tournament and players are not always in-form all the time.Bunch of Mickey Mouse and bunch of wins in 2014-2016 during Rafa’s off years. Prime for prime, 2-2 at HC slams and 5-0 on clay for Rafa. Slam dunk.
Beijing, Doha, ATP cup, LOL. Hc slams is 3-2 Djokovic, 2-2 prime to prime. Rg h2h is like 5-0 prime to prime. It’s a slam dunk.
It’s more like 29-31 not 26 bud.Since you love these nonsensical "prime" definitions, since Djokovic entered his "prime", Nadal has TWO measly wins on HC or outside clay overall.
It's not Djokovic's fault if Federer exits his prime at 26 or he goes 7 years with 1 slam title.
I say don't respond to this troll at all. He/She is trying to derail the thread. Go around him/her and make your post.Since you love these nonsensical "prime" definitions, since Djokovic entered his "prime", Nadal has TWO measly wins on HC or outside clay overall.
It's not Djokovic's fault if Federer exits his prime at 26 or he goes 7 years with 1 slam title.
Says the troll who posted this:I say don't respond to this troll at all. He/She is trying to derail the thread. Go around him/her and make your post.
Bingo. Quite amusing to try to equal 2015 Beijing win to 2013 Roland Garros for example.That's a problem with Djoker fans. They ignore the different weigh of each tournament and players are not always in-form all the time.
Throwing out numbers alone is useless without context
No wonder many Nadal fans have put him on ignore listBingo. Quite amusing to try to equal 2015 Beijing win to 2013 Roland Garros for example.
It’s more like 29-31 not 26 bud.
Prime to prime djokovic is 2-2 in hc slams vs nadal. Dont think anyone but forum nerds care about Beijing or atp cup micky mouse wins LOL
nadal didn't even win a set in 19 attempts. That's all we need to know. Its hopeless.overall:
Nole-Rafa HC 20-7
Rafa-Nole CC 20-8
When both in Top2
Nole-Rafa HC 8-1
Rafa-Nole CC 5-3
nadal didn't even win a set in 19 attempts. That's all we need to know. Its hopeless.
Lol then what is Nadal? Even tsitsipas makes it competitive vs Djokovic.It's ironic that Rafans label nearly every current player as a "mug."
2010 Djokovic came into the final on the back defeating a very good federer in 5 sets. 2019 Nadal had an easy run to the final and wasn’t tested. Can count both, 3-2 to Djokovic overall.2010 is "prime" Djokovic when he had his worst season ever outside the injury-ridden 2017, but 2019 when Nadal was #1, won 2 slams and made another final without dropping a set doesn't count lol.
2010 Djokovic came into the final on the back defeating a very good federer in 5 sets. 2019 Nadal had an easy run to the final and wasn’t tested. Can count both, 3-2 to Djokovic overall.
Very original topic to begin with, never heard before. Also I learned that Nadal has lost 19 consecutive sets on HC against Djo (even learned it twice in this thread alone), damn I never knew.Literally not one good argument made in 30 posts
Yeah it really gets unbearable lately. Regurgitating the same boring talking points and even bumping countless old threads. Not a Djoko hater by any means but just for those idiots I am inclined to wish him an early loss at the AO.Did all these djokovic stans just get out of bed? Don't y'all got anything better to do than talk about the same mundane things every day?
Do you think his early loss will discourage the fans or encourage even further? You should want him to keep winning so focus is on new topics.Yeah it really gets unbearable lately. Regurgitating the same boring talking points and even bumping countless old threads. Not a Djoko hater by any means but just for those idiots I am inclined to wish him an early loss at the AO.
Yeah it really gets unbearable lately. Regurgitating the same boring talking points and even bumping countless old threads. Not a Djoko hater by any means but just for those idiots I am inclined to wish him an early loss at the AO.
I seriously don't care what you guys focus on in your weird hero worshipping. I am here to discuss tennis or to some extent other sports, not worshipping a guy who couldnt care less about my existence. Thank God there is still the FPP section.Do you think his early loss will discourage the fans or encourage even further? You should want him to keep winning so focus is on new topics.
And what we are discussing isn't tennis?We are talking Australian opens and US opens.I seriously don't care what you guys focus on in your weird hero worshipping. I am here to discuss tennis or to some extent other sports, not worshipping a guy who couldnt care less about my existence. Thank God there is still the FPP section.
I am indeed no fan nor hater of any big 3 and could indeed skip those threads. However, reasonable and well-balanced posters are already posting less here which is a shame since we are getting less and less interesting discussions.If you are no fan no hater of any big3, why would you be so invested? isn't very easy to skip all those threads?
Tennis in general not limited to one guy, have you ever started a thread that does not involve Djokovic?And what we are discussing isn't tennis?We are talking Australian opens and US opens.
I am indeed no fan nor hater of any big 3 and could indeed skip those threads. However, reasonable and well-balanced posters are already posting less here which is a shame since we are getting less and less interesting discussions.
Just this week. I like many tennis players. But Djokovic is the one I support. It's in my username so don't be so frustrated.Tennis in general not limited to one guy, have you ever started a thread that does not involve Djokovic?
Reasonable?I am indeed no fan nor hater of any big 3 and could indeed skip those threads. However, reasonable and well-balanced posters are already posting less here which is a shame since we are getting less and less interesting discussions.
? Who said anything about banning?Well, why would you try to control others? are you trying to be mod and ban whoever you don't like?