REKX
Rookie
As a Federer and Nadal fan I feel humbled I got to witness these two. I started of only liking Federer, and disliking Nadal. But over time I grew to appreciate both, Nadal has the be the only player who has managed to make Federer look average at times - no one else in history could do that.
I find it funny that here people downplay Nadal's achievements so much. Look I'm not a fan of Federer and Nadal because they won slams in 2017, no it is because what they were doing ten years ago when they took things to a level never seen before. But for example Federer's Wimbledon 2017 draw was very easy, so was Nadal's 2017 US Open. But for some reason only Nadal gets the hate here.
Consider 2007, which was probably the greatest version of Federer in history, Nadal managed to take the game to 5 sets at Wimbledon 2007, against the greatest grass court player of all time. I think that is a wonderful achievement.
Then in 2008, Federer and Nadal played the Wimbledon final which many say was the greatest game of all time. In terms of drama maybe not for me, but in terms of overall quality yes it is amazing to watch. From both ends balls were looking out, yet they both managed to get it back cleanly and strongly.
Some here tell themselves Federer was playing bad in 2008 Wimbledon. How, he looked even better than 2007, he didn't lose a set in 2008 until the final. I personally thought Federer would win it in 4, but Nadal played amazingly well that match and deservedly beat Federer in that game.
Nadal came up with some shots which seem impossible, looked like clean winners from Roger, then somehow Nadal would get to it and hit a winner. Only Nadal at that form could have beaten Federer that day, and he did. Sampras wouldn't even get close (we saw the matchup favours Federer in their 2001 game).
There's a reason why almost every tennis fan, expert, pundit, current and past players, reviewers and commentators regard Wimbledon 2008 as the greatest match of all time - because both were playing at their highest level.
I find it funny that here people downplay Nadal's achievements so much. Look I'm not a fan of Federer and Nadal because they won slams in 2017, no it is because what they were doing ten years ago when they took things to a level never seen before. But for example Federer's Wimbledon 2017 draw was very easy, so was Nadal's 2017 US Open. But for some reason only Nadal gets the hate here.
Consider 2007, which was probably the greatest version of Federer in history, Nadal managed to take the game to 5 sets at Wimbledon 2007, against the greatest grass court player of all time. I think that is a wonderful achievement.
Then in 2008, Federer and Nadal played the Wimbledon final which many say was the greatest game of all time. In terms of drama maybe not for me, but in terms of overall quality yes it is amazing to watch. From both ends balls were looking out, yet they both managed to get it back cleanly and strongly.
Some here tell themselves Federer was playing bad in 2008 Wimbledon. How, he looked even better than 2007, he didn't lose a set in 2008 until the final. I personally thought Federer would win it in 4, but Nadal played amazingly well that match and deservedly beat Federer in that game.
Nadal came up with some shots which seem impossible, looked like clean winners from Roger, then somehow Nadal would get to it and hit a winner. Only Nadal at that form could have beaten Federer that day, and he did. Sampras wouldn't even get close (we saw the matchup favours Federer in their 2001 game).
There's a reason why almost every tennis fan, expert, pundit, current and past players, reviewers and commentators regard Wimbledon 2008 as the greatest match of all time - because both were playing at their highest level.
Last edited: