A lot of Djokovic fans are insecure about this era being called weak when it is, so you guys come up with theories like Fed is at his best today, everything is rapidly improving, ect.
It is what it is. 17 is an average fedfan answer to every single question. But how exactly do you measure the strength of an era?
Is Federer's era (2003-2007/2009 I guess) stronger becase he had to deal with the likes of Hewitt and Roddick? I'd say no, because they were absolutely no threat to Federer during his peak years. 15-0 in a row vs Hewitt at some point, and 11-0 in a row vs Roddick. I mean, no matter how good you think Federer was, they should have beaten him every now and then. This way, seems that they were impotent and irrelevant to the level of competition Federer faced. Maybe I should include Safin as well, because he basically showed up only one single time vs Federer. 9/10 times Federer straightsetted him. Sorry, I can't see that as a real challenge. People talk about Wawrinka being Safin's counterpart during Djokovic era, but the truth is, it's 4-2 at Slams for Djokovic, with 3/4 of those wins going to 5 sets.
Or, was Federer's era stronger because he had to fight Nadal at FO? But, Nadal was hardly a roadblock on hard and grass untill 2008-2009. At RG, sure from 2005-2008 and 2011, but he also stopped Djokovic six times. How many more do you need?
Djokovic has it easier now, than 2011-2014, because in each of those years, there was someone to take advantage of his level dropping. I admit there was noone e.g. at 2015 USO, because Djokovic's form wasn't that great at all there. In comparison with Federer, why was there no one to take advantage of his subpar level of play like semi-retired Guga did at 2004 RG? I'm talking about 2006 AO, 2007 USO etc. How exactly was the competition strong, when none of these players (apart from Nadal) couldn't even give Federer a hard time, let alone beat him, not for a period of 1 or 2 years, but a whole 2004-2007 era?
I personally never considered him a "God"
We'll see about that.