Breakpointerer
Legend
Yes, just referring to the fact that he had to go out due to injuriesHe played until he was 40. That's well beyond what he expected, I reckon
Yes, just referring to the fact that he had to go out due to injuriesHe played until he was 40. That's well beyond what he expected, I reckon
What?
The pioneer of the modern baseline era was a Swedish guy with long hair who achieved something no one else has, three Channel Slams.
Ain't too bad!!!
Only one Career GRAND SLAM though. And no Olympic Gold Medal in Singles play.
Rafa has Double Career GRAND SLAM and an Olympic Gold Medal in Singles.
Novak has Double Career GRAND SLAM .
And none of them have achieved the GRAND SLAM.
Look dude i am talking about post 2000 era that has been exclusively baseline.Borg's game was not even remotely closer to today's game, moreover there were many styles in Borg's time so he didn't make baseline era dominant .Comparing Borg's time with post 2000 is almost like comparing Rigby league as Rugby union. Fed introduced a new era with his perfect blend of offense and defense followed by Djokovic and Nadal. Players before him were lacking in one aspect or the other.
There is only ONE current player who has won in ALL categories of main tennis titles.
what? Nadal has health problems which makes it soon. When Novak is allowed to play tournaments he is always one of the top 2 top 3 favorites at an tournamentThe other two should follow and leave it to the youngsters
RF is a living legend
Not aware that any of the Big 3 have won Major Titles in Singles, Doubles and Mixed Doubles.
Who are you talking about?
A Grand Slam is important, but a career grand slam is just a media made concept by Agassi fans to glorify him. In reality winning 1AO, 1FO, 1W and 1 USO can never be a greater achievement than winning 1AO, 3W and 2USO because 4 < 6. Sampras was always greater than Agassi despite not winning the French and Agassi winning all 4,. this will never change.
Insanely expensive Platinum Daytona in that picture above.
Nonsense. Federer isn't retiring to "leave it to the youngsters", he's retiring because he's tried as hard and for as long as he's been able to, to come back, and he's come to accept now that it won't be possible. Cause his body won't allow him to.The other two should follow and leave it to the youngsters
RF is a living legend
Sorry DUDE!
Prior to Borg, the dominant and most successful style of tennis was Serve and Volley.
Borg arrived and proceeded to use topspin groundstokes and his athleticism as weapoons. He was able to use either as an attacking or defending weapon. And he was able to do all that using a wooden tennis racquet with a tiny hoop and natural gut strings.
The 1980 Wimbledon Men's Singles Final was billed as contest between Serve&Volley and Baseline styles.
Federer basically took Borg's game and went to the next level. He was able to do that thanks to the evolution of tennis equipment and sports science.
Borg wrote the book. Guys like Lendl, Wilander and Chang read the book and took its advice. Federer read Borg's book and added a few chapters of his own.
If you don't see that, then you weren't there.
This a thousand times. Main takeaway.It gives you a perspective of how long Nadal and Djokovic can play from now. Even for the ultimate haters enjoy them while you still can.
Fed's swiss chocolate commercial at the airport was funny. I think he's a natural in a comedy film or action James Bond / MI film. Some people just have it.The most aesthetically pleasing player I have ever seen in my life, both in person and on the screen. Glad I got to see his amazing career.
yep, the fans in Melbourne and AELTC would probably be applauding for an hour non-stop. He deserves it.Wish he'd gotten a proper send-off. I know he'll get one at the Laver Cup, but it would have been nice to play one final slam and do it front of the crowd there.
Give it a rest man.Yeah but Laver Cup was his ego and money trip not Slams. It takes a Serena to go out in a Slam, losing. Federer doesn't want to lose in a real match but just play a meaningless exhibition in which even if he loses he will be cheered because he is the organizer.