French Open Draw: Thiem and Rafa will not be on the same half.

weakera

Talk Tennis Guru
For Nadal? Tsitsipas would be more troublesome if he serves well as on clay his BH far more reliable than other surfaces. Fogini if on a roll would panic Rafa if he was playing well enough to make SF. Medvedev also would be more of a problem for Nadal. Basically players whose BHs are secure. Thiem on clay over 5 sets has shown his BH crumbles. He is now slicing alot more but against Nadal that will buy him bagels and breadsticks. Match ups are a big deal and over 5 sets on clay younger fitter versions of Thiem have been blown away.

Fognini would panic Rafa omg :-D :-D
 

TheGhostOfAgassi

Talk Tennis Guru
Having Rafa and Thiem as top two seeds instead of Rafa and Joker does not solve anything. The draw will still be rigged with Thiem and Joker in the same half.
So you expect Thiem not to be in Novak’s half 3 out of 3 slams this year, or you call it rigged?
 

Hitman

Bionic Poster
Nadal has lost 2 matches in BO5 on clay in his entire life. Including when Rome was BO5 finals against peak Fed/Coria and Davis cup matches..... I don't think it's about the draw bruh :cool:

da452e03a12ba6af-600x338.gif
 

merlinpinpin

Hall of Fame
In AO Rafa had Thiem in his half, was that rigged as well?
Was Thiem in Novak’s half in NY? Nope

So Novak fans have gotten Thiem in Novak’s half in one out of 3 slams and you calling it rigged?

:oops:

Just like Nadal fans were hollering that the draw was rigged when Nads got Djokovic in his half at slams some 10 years ago when this happened like twice in 18 times. People never change.
 

TheGhostOfAgassi

Talk Tennis Guru
Just like Nadal fans were hollering that the draw was rigged when Nads got Djokovic in his half at slams some 10 years ago when this happened like twice in 18 times. People never change.
10 years ago? Where were this people saying that, here in this forum? It was before my and most people’s here time.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Yes it is. This is from Saturday Night's Main Event November 1989.

The genius. Loved that character.

Brain/Gorilla and Jesse/Gorilla are so pleasing to hear on commentary. Really havent had great commentary since Peak JR/King :( all 3 duos really made everything so entertaining. A lost art
 

Hitman

Bionic Poster
Brain/Gorilla and Jesse/Gorilla are so pleasing to hear on commentary. Really havent had great commentary since Peak JR/King :( all 3 duos really made everything so entertaining. A lost art

Jesse/Vince use to do Saturday Night's Main Event. They were good also.

Jesse/Gorrila were for PPV

Brain/Gorrila did Wrestling Challenge and then some PPV after Jesse left

Have you watched the latest Stone Cold Broke Skull with Jerry Lawler? He says that the reason why commentators are not so special today is, back in their day, the commentators themselves were superstars and attractions. That is not true now.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Jesse/Vince use to do Saturday Night's Main Event. They were good also.

Jesse/Gorrila were for PPV

Brain/Gorrila did Wrestling Challenge and then some PPV after Jesse left

Have you watched the latest Stone Cold Broke Skull with Jerry Lawler? He says that the reason why commentators are not so special today is, back in their day, the commentators themselves were superstars and attractions. That is not true now.

I did watch it :) Jerry did some epic stuff I gotta give it to him.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
I do think (I'm almost certain) they'll put Thiem on Novak's half but I'm not sure if the former is even gonna be a factor, think USO win took a lot out of him. Both physically and emotionally.

The only real threat to Nadal at the FO this year is Novak, whose glory days at FO might just be behind him. In other words, Nadal 95%, field combined 5%.
 
D

Deleted member 770948

Guest
Since when are Spaniards given special treatment in France?
I've always heard its the other way around, that France has a racism problem....
And what would the Roland Garros tournament director get from helping Nadal?
Anyway, no proof that the draw has ever been rigged.
 

woodrow1029

Hall of Fame
Nor should he be. If Wimbledon can make their own rankings then why can't Roland Garros?

they actually can change the seedings. All grand slams can if they choose... per the grand slam Rulebook, the selection of seeds will beat the discretion of each individual grand slam tournament committee; however, the computer ranking list shall be a primary, but not sole basis for such selection.
 
D

Deleted member 762343

Guest
Nadal will reach the final and either Thiem or Djokovic will be his final opponent. Also, guaranteed this year’s RG will be played on red clay.

Bookmark this post!
 

BillKid

Hall of Fame
Rafa-Djoker would get way bigger ratings. Not even close. We've seen Rafa vs Thiem for the last 3 years and none of their matches have been close. We haven't seen Djokovic vs Nadal since 2015. Also, Djoker has a better chance of beating Rafa IMO, even if it is still very slim.
Nadal has yet to play against the new Thiem
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 770948

Guest
Clearly a loaded question. The true Rafa fans are hoping for a Nadal-Anderson final anyway.
I'm hope for Djokovic-Nadal at Rome and Roland Garros, so Nadal can increase the slam h2h lead to 10-6, and cut the h2h deficit to 28-29.
 

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
Is that even a question??

It is a question with an obvious answer - post#30 answered it. It is meant to make the OP think about the premise of his post on what is good for the tournament. I don’t think draws are rigged. Just in case they are, the organizers would be thinking about what’s good for the FO and not what is good for Nadal - it is not one and the same.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
It is a question with an obvious answer - post#30 answered it. It is meant to make the OP think about the premise of his post on what is good for the tournament. I don’t think draws are rigged. Just in case they are, the organizers would be thinking about what’s good for the FO and not what is good for Nadal - it is not one and the same.
I don't believe in draw rigging, but Fedovic being in the same half a whooping 16 out of 20 times in 2008-2012 was really suspect.
 

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
Hopefully Thiem doesn’t get upset in the first week as he has to adjust to clay quickly after not playing Rome. If he makes it to the second week, he is going to be a tougher threat to Nadal than in the past because he has that first Slam under his belt and will be more confident. Rafa will still be the favorite against Thiem, but we might be lucky enough to see an epic match.

I think that the odds are poor that Djokovic can beat Thiem this year at the FO when he has already lost to him twice in the past at Roland Garros. Thiem has improved and has more confidence whereas Novak continues to have more intensity fluctuations in difficult matches and Thiem is good enough to out-hit him on slow clay.

If I were Rafa, I would want both of them in the other half and face only one of them in the final after presumably a semi against a weaker opponent. If I were Novak, I would want to play Rafa in the semi and not in the final where Rafa is at his best - then hope that Thiem has nerves in the final. If Thiem is in Novak’s half, Thiem would probably be more relaxed playing Novak in the semi than in the final - so, I think it would be better for Novak to play Thiem in the final and Rafa in the semis.

if I were the organizers, I would hold an honest tournament and not rig the draw. But, I would know that a Rafa-Novak final would be the best for ratings. Also, a Rafa-Thiem semi would probably generate more ratings than a Thiem-Novak semi.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Hopefully Thiem doesn’t get upset in the first week as he has to adjust to clay quickly after not playing Rome. If he makes it to the second week, he is going to be a tougher threat to Nadal than in the past because he has that first Slam under his belt and will be more confident. Rafa will still be the favorite against Thiem, but we might be lucky enough to see an epic match.

I think that the odds are poor that Djokovic can beat Thiem this year at the FO when he has already lost to him twice in the past at Roland Garros. Thiem has improved and has more confidence whereas Novak continues to have more intensity fluctuations in difficult matches and Thiem is good enough to out-hit him on slow clay.

If I were Rafa, I would want both of them in the other half and face only one of them in the final after presumably a semi against a weaker opponent. If I were Novak, I would want to play Rafa in the semi and not in the final where Rafa is at his best - then hope that Thiem has nerves in the final. If Thiem is in Novak’s half, Thiem would probably be more relaxed playing Novak in the semi than in the final - so, I think it would be better for Novak to play Thiem in the final and Rafa in the semis.

if I were the organizers, I would hold an honest tournament and not rig the draw. But, I would know that a Rafa-Novak final would be the best for ratings. Also, a Rafa-Thiem semi would probably generate more ratings than a Thiem-Novak semi.
Nadal is not losing to Thiem at RG no matter how confident Thiem is.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Nadal is not losing to Thiem at RG no matter how confident Thiem is.
Nadal might lose to anyone at this point of his career. He was absolutely terrible for a big part of the 2019 clay season. Problem is, when Nadal is out of form, he is VERY out of form.
 

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
Nadal is not losing to Thiem at RG no matter how confident Thiem is.

Going by Nadal’s track record, that would be the safe bet. But, many uncertainties this year are new - no long clay season, long break, Fall weather, roof if there is rain etc. More to look forward to this year if they play the final than in the past.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Nadal might lose to anyone at this point of his career. He was absolutely terrible for a big part of the 2019 clay season. Problem is, when Nadal is out of form, he is VERY out of form.
And then went out to routine everyone at Rome and RG.

He'll be fine.
 

Hitman

Bionic Poster
Nadal is 34 years old and after a very long break. I have a feeling he isn't winning it. 20 slams are too good to be true.

We don't know what the long break will become for Rafa yet. Rafa has come back from long periods without tennis before also and done just fine.
 
Top