Nostradamus
Bionic Poster
Oh,, the Deuce arrived,,, and AGAIN started making stupid mistakes and went for too much and Forehand long by 5 feet and backhand return long on match point.......................How Stupid is that ?????????
I hope Federer and Nadal stop winning slams very soon, starting to get sick.Lovely tribute!
But you really think this is his last Slam? I would hope for more at this point
Even if thiem had pulled off that first set i think nadal pulls this off in 4 sets. I thought he served beautifully compared to his other matches before.
6 slams in a row for Fedal, alternating.
AO 17 - Fed
RG 17 - Nadal
Wim 17 - Fed
USO 17 - Nadal
AO 18 - Fed
RG 18 - Nadal
My point is that I’m relieved. In 2016, it seemed very unlikely that Fed could add three slams.
Like he’s not as sick of winning this thing as we are watching him win it...lmao.Oh god Nadal trying to imitate Federer crying at the AO this year lol
Thiem never tries new tactics.Thiem didn’t even really try any new tactics. I mean even the weekend warriors on this message board are saying to take the serve out wide.
For the 10,000,000th time: who in their right mind expected any other result? Thiem actually outperformed the predicted 6-2, 6-1, 6-1 scoreline. He was never going to win this match even had Nadal literally had a broken leg. He's mentally weak and a choker in big moments. He's the opposite of what 19 year old Sampras was at the USO, when he casually and with no nerves shot down Lendl, Mac and Agassi to win the title.
The only way to beat Nadal on RG is to rob him of time, stand in close to the baseline and take everything early. Also attack the net after serving him wide. Did Thiem do any of that? No, nor did any sane person expect him to.
what exactly did Rosewall say ?
Did he say it was slightly disappointing from Thiem or something like that ?
34 winners for Thiem compared to 26 to Nadal in a 6-4 6-3 6-2 Nadal win and I'm getting flak from people here for calling me a pusher?!
WTF!?
Let's see what "aggressive" Nadal does on faster surfaces now. Pavlasek is waiting...
Well i hope this pushes Fed at Wimbledon to win it. It feels like it’s been a year since i saw him play. Too much time off but it helps to recharge the batteries.
Fed’s slams without Wimbledon:Fed will have to play until he is at least age 39 to win 11 Wimbledon titles.
Nadal believes Thiem will win RG soon. He just said it.
hahahahaha yes, Depends of course who he plays.Probably managed to stay awake for that 2008 Wimbledon final he won against whazzhisname though.
For the 10,000,000th time: who in their right mind expected any other result? Thiem actually outperformed the predicted 6-2, 6-1, 6-1 scoreline. He was never going to win this match even had Nadal literally had a broken leg. He's mentally weak and a choker in big moments. He's the opposite of what 19 year old Sampras was at the USO, when he casually and with no nerves shot down Lendl, Mac and Agassi to win the title.
The only way to beat Nadal on RG is to rob him of time, stand in close to the baseline and take everything early. Also attack the net after serving him wide. Did Thiem do any of that? No, nor did any sane person expect him to.
Fedfans: where would we be now if Roger had not won the additional slams from 2017 onwards???
Wow at calling Thiem disappointing. Harsh to say the least.
Magnificent, astonishing, epic... Got to really appreciate what this guy has done in his career, especially now when it's more and more likely that we have seen his last Slam.
Let's hear it again.
Vainqueur de Roland Garros
deux mille cinq
deux mille six
deux mille sept
deux mille huit
deux mille dix
deux mille onze
deux mille douze
deux mille treize
deux mille quatorze
deux mille dix-sept
deux mille dix-huit
l'Espagnol Rafael Nadal!
Easy, do you know how boring Rafa has made watching RG. It was fine first few times. You can easily hate Nadal.How can anyone hate these tennis players
Fed Rafa Djoko ?
They have made our childhood and youth memorable .
Congrats Rafa for #17 Champ
Fed will have to play until he is at least age 39 to win 11 Wimbledon titles.
34 winners for Thiem compared to 26 to Nadal in a 6-4 6-3 6-2 Nadal win and I'm getting flak from people here for calling me a pusher?!
WTF!?
Let's see what "aggressive" Nadal does on faster surfaces now. Pavlasek is waiting...
Taking everything early is not Thiem's game though, and you're stupid if you think he could magically adapt to that way of playing. Delusional, even.For the 10,000,000th time: who in their right mind expected any other result? Thiem actually outperformed the predicted 6-2, 6-1, 6-1 scoreline. He was never going to win this match even had Nadal literally had a broken leg. He's mentally weak and a choker in big moments. He's the opposite of what 19 year old Sampras was at the USO, when he casually and with no nerves shot down Lendl, Mac and Agassi to win the title.
The only way to beat Nadal on RG is to rob him of time, stand in close to the baseline and take everything early. Also attack the net after serving him wide. Did Thiem do any of that? No, nor did any sane person expect him to.
I am a realistic and no nonsense Fed fan. Definitely not your class of Fed fan.You're not relieved about anything. All indications that I've seen tell me you're primarily a Nadal fan who posted a bait post that I was stupid enough to bite on, but I'm honestly wondering what your point was.
Ifs can go on forever. If Nadal had 0 RG titles he'd only have 6 slams. But he just so happens to be god like on clay.
Can Rafa catch Freds slam count...with just French Opens?