@Sport
You appear easily amused if that argument makes you
laugh. I am easily amused as well and I might be inclined to say that your argument makes me LOL. My point, as if you didn't know, is that the very top players (Djokovic, Federer, Sampras) are not winning OGMs even tho lesser players, like Murray and the other 6 players have won Olympic gold in singles. Among Rafa, Novak, Roger and Pete --
66 single slam wins but only 1 gold in singles. Whereas Andy M with 3 singles slams wins has 2 Au medals. Sure this is quite an accomplishment in itself. But this Bo3 (except for the men's final) tournament is nowhere close to the prestige or importance as the slam events.
Sure, some top players have won singles OGM. Never said it hasn't happened. However, while the ATGs have a desire to play the Bo3 Olympics,
I do not believe that they put the same effort into winning an OGM as they do for the slam events.
If by
multiple, you mean
TWO, then fine, Kafelnikov is a multiple slam winner in singles. And, yes, he was #1 in 1999... for a bit over a month. Not to diminish Kafelnikov as a player, or his accomplishments, he was nowhere close to the stature of Sampras, Federer, or Djokovic.
Again, not saying that OGM is trivial. But I am saying that Kaf's gold, Puig's gold, the Au of Dementieva, and Murray's Au x2, does not put them at the same level or in the same conversation as the ATGs who have won 14+ slams events. Fine to acknowledge the OGM, but let's put it into perspective.