Prime Hewitt beats prime Djokovic on HC.

Who wins?

  • Hewitt

  • Lleyton

  • Djokovic

  • Novak


Results are only viewable after voting.

abmk

Bionic Poster
simply delusional. Brilliant trolling.

Nope, not at all, -ve tennis IQ/knowledga fella.

You want some trolling. I'll give you.

peak Querrey > peak Djokovic at Wimbledon. See 2016 Wim for proof.
peak Murray > peak Djokovic at Wimbledon. See Oly 12 and Wim 13 for proof.
peak Darcis > peak Nadal at Wimbledon. See Wim 13 for proof.
peak Soderling > peak Nadal at RG. See RG 09 for proof.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
Depends what you call prime. Those versions of Djokovic you picked are not what i would consider. If you pick a top form Djokovic then he wins most times.
 

BackhandDTL

Hall of Fame
Depends what you call prime. Those versions of Djokovic you picked are not what i would consider. If you pick a top form Djokovic then he wins most times.
You are confusing peak with prime. It’s not peak but those are prime years.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
You are confusing peak with prime. It’s not peak but those are prime years.
Djokovic prime was 2011-mid 16 / Wim 18 - AO 19 IMO. I think 2007- 2009 were all better than 2010 for Nole

I think Hewitt could beat these versions. But like I say vs better versions he is a underdog.
 

BackhandDTL

Hall of Fame
Djokovic prime was 2011-mid 16 / Wim 18 - AO 19 IMO. I think 2007- 2009 were all better than 2010 for Nole

I think Hewitt could beat these versions. But like I say vs better versions he is a underdog.
Versus better versions he is an underdog? USO 2011 Djokovic takes him to the cleaners and tears him a new a$$hole. Understatement of the century.

The problem with Hewitt is that he has no significant weapon to beat Djokovic over a BO5. Even against a mediocre Djokovic.

But then again you are the same guy that was wondering whether 06 Fed was beating 12 Murray, which is a laughable post altogther.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RS

abmk

Bionic Poster
LOL, backhand DTL getting frustrated that his thread is not getting the responses he wanted (his ignorance is being exposed)
We call that:

tenor.gif
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
Versus better versions he is an underdog? USO 2011 Djokovic takes him to the cleaners and tears him a new a$$hole. Understatement of the century.

ha ha
good joke, joker.
2011 USO djokovic was tied 1 all vs Tipsy before Tipsy's injury in the QF (not an early round match). But he easily beats prime Hewitt? Nope.
It would take him a tough 4-setter.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
Versus better versions he is an underdog? USO 2011 Djokovic takes him to the cleaners and tears him a new a$$hole. Understatement of the century.

The problem with Hewitt is that he has no significant weapon to beat Djokovic over a BO5. Even against a mediocre Djokovic.

But then again you are the same guy that was wondering whether 06 Fed was beating 12 Murray, which is a laughable post altogther.
Lol that was a bait thread the fact you fell for that made it a victory.
 

Third Serve

Talk Tennis Guru
Versus better versions he is an underdog? USO 2011 Djokovic takes him to the cleaners and tears him a new a$$hole. Understatement of the century.

The problem with Hewitt is that he has no significant weapon to beat Djokovic over a BO5. Even against a mediocre Djokovic.

But then again you are the same guy that was wondering whether 06 Fed was beating 12 Murray, which is a laughable post altogther.
How could you not see that this was bait?
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
You’re trying way to hard bud. Great persistence though. Either that or your feelings maybe are hurt.

says the guy who couldn't even detect that Fed 06/Murray 12 thread was bait.
I'm just enjoying making fun of your ridiculousness now.
 

abmk

Bionic Poster
2011/2012/2015 Djokovic will kill Hewitt. What makes you think otherwise????

2011 Djokovic wins in a 4-setter.
2012 Djokovic lost to Murray in windy conditions in the final. Hewitt would do similarly.
2015 Djokovic struggled with old Fed in final (level in final was not better than prime Hewitt). It be a tough battle vs prime hewitt.
 
Top