World Tour Finals 2016 RR: Andy Murray vs Kei Nishikori

Murray or Nishikori


  • Total voters
    21

Big_Dangerous

Talk Tennis Guru
Nishikori is so useless, just like Ferrer. Almost never wins, but pushes to the limits. 200 minutes match and now Murray will have just 1 day of rest until the end of the tournament. It's unreal how Djokovic always gets the day rest before the semifinals.

All that rest didn't do Djokovic any good at the U.S. Open. ;)
 

Steve0904

Talk Tennis Guru
Yes, in 2011 he was much better, nothing to compare here. But 2015-2016 is same level. I'm pretty sure he would have won against Murray in Shanghai final. Bautista just played the match of his life, for the first and last time. Murray wasn't impressive there, just won against "real level" Bautista.

But this is how it starts. 1 guy plays the "match of his life," then 5 or 6 others start doing it and before you know it you're in permanent decline. This happened to Federer too. He wasn't losing to young Nadal and Djokovic often in 2010. He usually didn't get that far. It was Soderling, Berdych 2x, Baghdatis, Montanes, Gulbis. Guys he beat with his eyes closed between 2004-2009.

Now the signs are showing with Djokovic. Querrey, RBA, Cilic (who was previously 0-14).Injured and had to pull out of Cincy and Beijing. Lots of miles on that body. In fact, Djokovic has played 101 more matches than Murray in his career right now even though they were only born a week apart.
 

TheMuzziah

Hall of Fame
Is it just me or Murray looks absolutely knackered? Hopefully has got enough left in the tank for the semis.

Anyways great match as expected. Andy wins his first two RR matches for the first time in London (last time he's done that was back in 2008).

Kei was really good today, would like to see him finish second in the group! :p
 

Desertman

Hall of Fame
But this is how it starts. 1 guy plays the "match of his life," then 5 or 6 others start doing it and before you know it you're in permanent decline. This happened to Federer too. He wasn't losing to young Nadal and Djokovic often in 2010. He usually didn't get that far. It was Soderling, Berdych 2x, Baghdatis, Montanes, Gulbis. Guys he beat with his eyes closed between 2004-2009.

Now the signs are showing with Djokovic. Querrey, RBA, Cilic (who was previously 0-14).Injured and had to pull out of Cincy and Beijing. Lots of miles on that body. In fact, Djokovic has played 101 more matches in his career right now even though they were only born a week apart.

And this has what to do with the WTF?

You need to start a "Djokovic is s#*te now" thread :D
 

tennisaddict

Bionic Poster
Nishikori is so useless, just like Ferrer. Almost never wins, but pushes to the limits. 200 minutes match and now Murray will have just 1 day of rest until the end of the tournament. It's unreal how Djokovic always gets the day rest before the semifinals.

I am hoping Stan will clown away to give an easy SF . RaoMug after that , should not be a problem.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Raonic is Berdych Jr.

Will beat everyone he is supposed to beat.
vomit-into-the-toilet.gif

Now I know why I'm starting to dislike him. ThiMug somehow must save tennis against all odds.:confused:
 

bjsnider

Hall of Fame
I don't know if someone has already reported this, but this match was the longest ever played at the WTF (3 hrs, 20 mins).
 

Big_Dangerous

Talk Tennis Guru
I don't know if someone has already reported this, but this match was the longest ever played at the WTF (3 hrs, 20 mins).

Surely it cannot be, as many years ago the matches used to be best 3/5 sets. I remember Federer vs Nalbandian in the final of 2005 had to be longer than 3 hrs 20 mins.

It's got to be the longest match since the WTFs moved to the O2 arena in London.
 

helennnnnn

Professional
@andy_murray d. #Nishikori 67 64 64 in 3h, 20m -- longest #ATPFinals best-of-3 match on record (since 1991).

Previous longest #ATPFInals best-of-3 sets match was 3h, 12m in 2010 SF -- @RafaelNadal d. #Murray 76 36 76.
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
What a fool Andy was for not closing out that 1st set when he had a set point (netted a routine forehand down the line) and then squandering his mini break in the tie-break. He could have closed it out in straights, instead he had to grind it out for over 3 hours. Couldn't even serve it out at the first opportunity. With his energy levels obviously already low after playing so much tennis recently, a match of this length was the last thing he needed!

Given that he finished top of the group with 2 wins (same as Djokovic), how come he hasn't already qualified for the semis like Novak?
 

Sysyphus

Talk Tennis Guru
What a fool Andy was for not closing out that 1st set when he had a set point (netted a routine forehand down the line) and then squandering his mini break in the tie-break. He could have closed it out in straights, instead he had to grind it out for over 3 hours. Couldn't even serve it out at the first opportunity. With his energy levels obviously already low after playing so much tennis recently, a match of this length was the last thing he needed!

Given that he finished top of the group with 2 wins (same as Djokovic), how come he hasn't already qualified for the semis like Novak?

because there's no possible way for two players to finish above Novak by now, whereas there is technically in Murray's group. If Cilic beats Wowrinka tonight, Murray's through.
 

donquijote

G.O.A.T.
What a fool Andy was for not closing out that 1st set when he had a set point (netted a routine forehand down the line) and then squandering his mini break in the tie-break. He could have closed it out in straights, instead he had to grind it out for over 3 hours. Couldn't even serve it out at the first opportunity. With his energy levels obviously already low after playing so much tennis recently, a match of this length was the last thing he needed!

Given that he finished top of the group with 2 wins (same as Djokovic), how come he hasn't already qualified for the semis like Novak?

Stan beats Cilic
Nishi beats Cilic
Stan beats Murray

All three will have 2 wins.
 

Sysyphus

Talk Tennis Guru
But if Thiem or Raonic win their next match and Djokovic were to lose to Monfils, why couldn't either of them finish above him?
One can but not both.. One wins and the other loses, so one of them will end up with just one win.
Djoko at worst finishes #2.
 

Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil

Talk Tennis Guru

Steve0904

Talk Tennis Guru
oh, h2h goes ahead of sets won?

Yes. It does. Djokovic has finished first even if he by some miracle loses to Monfils. Because only one of Raonic or Thiem can go 2-1 and Djokovic has already beaten both of them. In the case of a 2 way breaker, H2H is the first TB'er.
 

Meles

Bionic Poster
Yes. It does. Djokovic has finished first even if he by some miracle loses to Monfils. Because only one of Raonic or Thiem can go 2-1 and Djokovic has already beaten both of them. In the case of a 2 way breaker, H2H is the first TB'er.
If Raonic had won over Djoko and Thiem beat Raonic and all were 2-1, then how would the first and second player from the group be selected?
 

Big_Dangerous

Talk Tennis Guru
http://www.barclaysatpworldtourfinals.com/en/event/semifinal-qualifying-procedure

When two players have the same number of wins, yes. If three players have the same number of wins then sets won is looked. But since only one between Raonic and Thiem can match Djokovic's number of wins because they will play each other, it means Djokovic has secured the top spot in the group because he defeated both of them.

Is he going to tank against Monfils? Lol, Monfils might tank too. Could be an entertaining match as neither guy has anything to really play for.
 

Steve0904

Talk Tennis Guru
If Raonic had won over Djoko and Thiem beat Raonic and all were 2-1, then how would the first and second player from the group be selected?

Set W/L percentage. So for example Murray's set W/L % right now 4/5 or 80%. Then after that it's game W/L%. So if you win a set 6-3 your game W/L % is 6/9 or 66%. That actually happened before. In 2009, Federer, Murray, and Delpo all had a 1-1 H2H and equal set W/L %, but Murray was eliminated on game %.
 
Last edited:

Chanwan

G.O.A.T.
But this is how it starts. 1 guy plays the "match of his life," then 5 or 6 others start doing it and before you know it you're in permanent decline. This happened to Federer too. He wasn't losing to young Nadal and Djokovic often in 2010. He usually didn't get that far. It was Soderling, Berdych 2x, Baghdatis, Montanes, Gulbis. Guys he beat with his eyes closed between 2004-2009.

Now the signs are showing with Djokovic. Querrey, RBA, Cilic (who was previously 0-14).Injured and had to pull out of Cincy and Beijing. Lots of miles on that body. In fact, Djokovic has played 101 more matches than Murray in his career right now even though they were only born a week apart.
he went 4-1 vs. Djoko in 2010 iirc. 1-1 vs. Rafa.
Rafa didn't play that many top-10'ers before the WTF that year, because the rest of the field was quite awful for much of the year.
Edit: Rafa went 7-5 vs. top-10'ers in 2010 prior to the WTF if I can count. 11-6 after, having his best WTF ever.
 
Top