Beacon Hill
Hall of Fame
Have you watched Serena play the last few years? She is often terribly off balance.I was just shocked at how many times she has lost her balance/ coordination on simple shots, and how many UE she produced.
Have you watched Serena play the last few years? She is often terribly off balance.I was just shocked at how many times she has lost her balance/ coordination on simple shots, and how many UE she produced.
You're still not quite getting the whole gist of how it works but hopefully Bianca's got a good accountant who does.And because the Canadian tax rate is generally higher, she 'll likely get a credit for the entire amount paid to the IRS.
Andreescu has a 38-4 record this year (before the US Open). Has never lost to a top 10 player. She has everything: power, precision, consistency, athleticism, agility, intelligence, mental toughness. But sure, Svitolina is worlds ahead of her!Svitolina is worlds ahead of Andreescu right now... in every possible way. And Williams absolutely crushed Svitolina... and Williams wasn't even playing her best tennis. I'd love for it to be a competitive and dramatic match, but I think this is going to be a rout. Williams in 2.
I know a lot of people hated seeing the top women seeds going out early, but I personally love seeing Svitolina, Andreescu, and Bencic come through the draw. That's awesome for women's tennis. The women's field is so good right now. You literally have no idea what is going to happen in the Top-20 (aside from Williams bulldozing through a draw -- and even that is unpredictable anymore).
Well done Andreescu !
Serena jumping over that ball that went long was cringe worthy. Ball was never going to hit her. She just likes being over dramatic.
I think you are confusing her fitness trainer Virginie Tremblay, who did assume coaching duties but only in Aukland since her actual coach was unable to make the trip. Edit: but since you wonder, she played tennis as a junior, though maybe not at an international level. She consulted regularly with the actual coach in Aukland.
Sylvain Bruneau is her coach and responsible for turning her from a hard hitter into the player with an intricate game she is now.
This income is not taxable in canada because it is not income earned in Canada. The Canadian government does not tax on the basis of "world income", but the USA does. Canada does tax income earned at the Rogers Cup, whether the player is Canadian or not.I don't see how a U.S. tournament can dictate how a foreign player pays taxes. That is likely decided by the Canadian government.
45-4Andreescu has a 38-4 record this year. Has never lost to a top 10 player. She has everything: power, precision, consistency, athleticism, agility, intelligence, mental toughness. But sure, Svitolina is worlds ahead of her!
This income is not taxable in canada because it is not income earned in Canada. The Canadian government does not tax on the basis of "world income", but the USA does. Canada does tax income earned at the Rogers Cup, whether the player is Canadian or not.
She has played and won 13 matches in a row, she beat Serena twice in that process.There is no way anyone can make a prediction about long term consistency of WTA players. Injury, the depth of the WTA. There are no dominant players. She may get to #1 doubtful she stays there for long. To many good players can beat her on any given day.
So an American playing in the Rogers Cup pays taxes to Canada on his prize winnings. After that, he has to pay additional taxes to the U.S.
American players who earn money abroad disclose their winnings on their 1040, but the taxation of those earnings depends on tax treaties we have with that country, taxes paid to that country for your Foreign Tax Credit, and tons of other factors.
I really like what I've seen,but I have to see how she does on grass and clay before I get too carried away with her as a consistent top player. Few WTA players seem to be able to play really well across all surfaces,Halep perhaps being the most consistent atm...She has played and won 13 matches in a row, she beat Serena twice in that process.
Hard to tell with those credentials, that she can be beaten by too many good players.
Forget not, her Indian wells victory, where she beat Svitolina in semifinals, and Kerber in the final. Two good players, well she got them.
And even Muguruza, that on a given day can beat almost anyone, got thrashed 6/0 6/1
She is 19 and on the rise.
A few years ago, Bencic beat Serena. Bencic is smart, but it was obvious that she lacks power and stamina.
Well, Andreescu got both, power and stamina.
In the last 3 years, we've seen 3 girls with real power, Serena, Osaka, and Andreescu. Osaka is lost, Serena is fading.
I don't see too many good players that can beat her on ANY GIVEN DAY, as you say.
I'm definetely not doing taxes for anyone else, don't worry. Looks like there were agreements or something I didn't know of and it was more complicated than what was reported in news article I had read here that had dealt with the subject, so thanks for the correction, but I was mainly trying to insist that it was not the country of residence that was responsible for taxing the prize money.Boy, I sure hope you're not an accountant doing taxes for anyone. Bianca would have to fill out her tax return claiming all her income, less expenses incurred to earn that income, and pay tax on the net amount less a credit for taxes she paid in other countries with which Canada has a tax treaty. It's all very complicated but the formula is basically what I laid out.
Seems many pro athletes move to Monte Carlo. These days, Governments have there hands in our pockets a lot more. Might as well give them all our money, and they will give us what we need. Oh wait that is socialism ( Great until you run out of everyone's else's money. )
And what do you think I'm not understanding?You're still not quite getting the whole gist of how it works but hopefully Bianca's got a good accountant who does.
As Serena danced around the court being hailed as the greatest women's player of all time, the camera was supposed to pan around the crowd, showing all the Black celebrities gloating like they had some part in her success.
But their hero is now old and fat and shouldn't be wearing skin-tight clothing. A sweaty mess with rolls around her middle.
Long Live Stefi Graf.
Well it happens and they're certainly free to do that. She can pay Canada back for their funding. No rule on paying them back in perpetuity. So many Euro players have domiciled in Monaco and American players take up residence in Florida or Texas.Exactly. Canada provided her and her family with citizenship and opportunities, and funded her junior tennis career. But why bother giving back now that she is able to earn a lot of money. Life is about taking all that you can, and giving as little as possible.
I believe your main point is incorrect. Most countries consider all the income you made anywhere in the world. It all must be declared. Then taxes owing may be adjusted if you paid taxes to another jurisdiction, and there is a reciprocal tax treaty with that country. What is different about the United States compared to almost all other countries is that citizens are responsible for filing and paying US taxes not based on whether they reside in the US, but whether they are US citizens, or even considered citizens for tax purposes.I should have been more specific, but the my main point stands - which was the basis for USA income tax is world income. Yes, generally the taxes paid in other countries is credited based on tax treaties. Other countries generally only tax income earned in that country and not on world income. Tennis players seek tax havens not because of prize money income tax but to save income tax on money from endorsements and investments etc. American players generally don't relocate to tax havens because they have to pay American income tax based on world income anyway.
Yes, she should calculate exactly how much funding she received, and pay back only that amount. And if she didn't make it as a professional, like 99.9% of the other juniors in Tennis Canada programs, of course she would not pay anything back. Take advantage of social programs when you need them, but don't feel any responsibility to fund them when you can afford to, and after you've benefited from them - it only makes sense. She doesn't need Tennis Canada anymore, so why should she help them out? She might not even need Canadian citizenship anymore, so move away. If later on if she sees some advantage in being Canadian again, and after she wouldn't have to pay higher taxes, then she could come back.Well it happens and they're certainly free to do that. She can pay Canada back for their funding. No rule on paying them back in perpetuity. So many Euro players have domiciled in Monaco and American players take up residence in Florida or Texas.
Have you watched Serena play the last few years? She is often terribly off balance.
Well, no. She should pay them back with a bonus or what she feels is fair & appreciative. I don't think she'll give up Canadian citizenship though. So, she may never escape those taxes.Yes, she should calculate exactly how much funding she received, and pay back only that amount. And if she didn't make it as a professional, like 99.9% of the other juniors in Tennis Canada programs, of course she would not pay anything back. Take advantage of social programs when you need them, but don't feel any responsibility to fund them when you can afford to, and after you've benefited from them - it only makes sense. She doesn't need Tennis Canada anymore, so why should she help them out? She might not even need Canadian citizenship anymore, so move away. If later on if she sees some advantage in being Canadian again, and after she wouldn't have to pay higher taxes, then she could come back.
Last year, no? Believe she was around there in the first set v Osaka.Anyone know the last time Serena Williams served 44 percent in a grand slam?
totally agree here. this is my biggest observation. I have not been a Serena fan over the years nor do I watch much womens tennis but she literally seems to be stumbling around all over the court. She's not in balance and terrible preparation. No chop steps, not on balls of feet, just flat footed. Age and weight are catching up to her. she has superior upper body strength and stroke muscle memory to still pull off amazing shots even off balance. against most of the tour she can still dominate but against the top players who are hitting big she is exposed. To me that strange double clutch on the sitter was an example-- just coming into the ball with bad preparation and trying to do it with all upper body... misjudging.Have you watched Serena play the last few years? She is often terribly off balance.
We can't be sure how Bianca will react. This is her first major finals. This is not Indian Wells finals.
Yes, Serena has the pressure of #24 but she has been in the finals 33 times. Ridiculous... The kid is the one most likely to feel the pressure.
Bianca says Serena is her idol. How can she not be intimidated by going up against her childhood idol?
Serena is the last opponent Bianca wants to be playing.
Maybe but we all should be wise enough now to not crown the next dominate force in womens tennis after one good year.I think we all know now that Bianca plays like a veteran and feels no pressure that she can't overcome and isn't intimidated by anyone. A future Superstar perhaps?
I agree with congrats to Bianca.
I think that you are predisposed to dislike anything Serena does. If anyone else jumped over that ball, I'm guessing you wouldn't have noticed/cared. It wasn't significant. Let it go.
Wow, even more impressive!45-4
I don't get upset - it's not worth it. Bianca got a lot from Canada that allowed her to get where she is. So if she accepts a system that funds her to become exceedingly rich, i don't think it's too much to ask to also accept the other side of it - Canada's tax structure that provides money for programs such as the one from which she benefited. So she makes 6 million this year instead of 8. It's not so bad.Well, no. She should pay them back with a bonus or what she feels is fair & appreciative. I don't think she'll give up Canadian citizenship though. So, she may never escape those taxes.
You can't get upset at people relocating for tax reasons. There's hundreds of thousands of ex-NewYorkers, Californians, and people in other high tax states/countries doing just that. I like these states but the savings & potential investments really add up with a relocation. Quality of life is what's important though.
I agree with you if her giveback + bonus due to her success truly helps other social programs and is not wasted on unproven or low probable success initiatives.I don't get upset - it's not worth it. Bianca got a lot from Canada that allowed her to get where she is. So if she accepts a system that funds her to become exceedingly rich, i don't think it's too much to ask to also accept the other side of it - Canada's tax structure that provides money for programs such as the one from which she benefited. So she makes 6 million this year instead of 8. It's not so bad.
I don't get upset - it's not worth it. Bianca got a lot from Canada that allowed her to get where she is. So if she accepts a system that funds her to become exceedingly rich, i don't think it's too much to ask to also accept the other side of it - Canada's tax structure that provides money for programs such as the one from which she benefited. So she makes 6 million this year instead of 8. It's not so bad.
As Canada has a somewhat democratic structure, at least citizens can vote to influence what tax revenue is used for. Anyway, back to well done Bianca for beating Serena, and hope she can win a few more.I agree with you if her giveback + bonus due to her success truly helps other social programs and is not wasted on unproven or low probable success initiatives.
Who was the scrawny screaming brunette the camera kept panning to who kept throwing her arms up in the air like Jesus just descended on the court?
If it had gone to a third set, it was anyone's match. Might have to give the edge to Serena, especially with that hostile crowd loudly against Bianca.
Would have dwarfed the 40-15 Wimbledon choke.
5-1
But would you be losing your f-ing mind at every Serena point if you were in the crowd?
The crowd is so fcking annoying, I hate it when people cheer on double-faults and unforced errors.
What is this? I thought the old Soviet Union went out of business. Apparently contrary opinions to yours are not to be allowed.
I said the crowd was on Serena's side (clearly a self evident claim if you watched the match) and after going O for four in her last four finals
getting another slam title now amounts to a growing mental hurdle.
This is not "denigrating" Serena. There are called common sense observations. Sorry your knickers got twisted up. You also could relax and breathe some more.
Yes. Great work tracking down those images. Impressive.
Serena played better in the second set: In the first photo(1-2), she breaks back to give the fans some joy.
In the second, she holds to win a third game after a long dry spell after just breaking the Andreescu in the game before(3-5). The fans want more and let her know
In the third photo, she breaks again (4-5)...it seems to be working and the fans get even louder. Not sure if this where Bianca plugged her ears...if not...it was the next game where Serena held. Most 19 year olds would be a quivering pile of jelly in that enviroment (crowd knows it) but Andreescu holds for 5-6 and the breaks , again, for 5-7 and the Championship. Damn impressive !!!
I think Serena just met someone that competed better on Saturday...nuff said
Yes. Great work tracking down those images. Impressive.
I remember all three people though I was referring mostly to number two.
They were all greatly invested in their tennis God, Serena, it looks like but sometimes God does not answer your prayers.
The man I thought might have been in the Williams player's box but I could be wrong.
Also on the Andreescu bandwagon early at US Open once I looked into her record, but did not post anywhere on it.I think @Meles predicted the men's final participants as well.
A few weeks before USO he had a long post about Nadal and Moya retooling for more success on grass and hardcourt, and that Nadal may start winning more on those surfaces.
He also posted about US Open conditions suiting Nadal after reading info about the surface underlay.
He was quite bullish about Medvedev's chances weeks out from the start of the tournament.