V
Vamos Rafa Nadal
Guest
Who will win the final????
Whoa there cowboy !....... We can dream though !Norrie in straights.
Whoa there cowboy !....... We can dream though !
He could keep the ball inside the lines for a start.Norrie beat Basilashvili like an absolute drum in Rotterdam earlier this year. 6-0, 6-3. Hard to see what Nikoloz is going to bring differently this time.
Mine too but I have hopes for my fellow half Scot.my dream was Grigor lol. This is just a nightmare either way
This is definitely a more surprising final, lmao.And I thought we couldn’t surpass Miami
No. No it doesn't.Is this the most ridiculous Masters final of all time? Certainly in the last 20 years, no? I think it tops Sock vs Krajinovic.
He could keep the ball inside the lines for a start.
Two titles since then. The first the week after Rotterdam.Norrie beat Basilashvili like an absolute drum in Rotterdam earlier this year. 6-0, 6-3. Hard to see what Nikoloz is going to bring differently this time.
Just when we thought that was the case of the Paris Masters.This as a masters final is a joke! It’s a first round match
Then either deal with it or don't watch. ******** and moaning doesn't change it.This as a masters final is a joke! It’s a first round match
I won’t watch it and I suspect many others won’t I will wager a bet this will be the least watched masters in history, sad state of affairs for the game these two in a finalThen either deal with it or don't watch. ******** and moaning doesn't change it.
A sad state of affairs for who?I won’t watch it and I suspect many others won’t I will wager a bet this will be the least watched masters in history, sad state of affairs for the game these two in a final
Sad state of affairs for Tennis if these two are making masters finals.A sad state of affairs for who?
The finalists? No, they've played well and beaten their opponents. That's their job and they've done it well. They deserve to be there.
You? Well if you only want your favourites in the final then it says more about your wish for tennis to satisfy you than your appreciation for the sport of tennis as a whole.
The sport? The sport of tennis is bigger than anyone who has ever played or will play and will easily accommodate more first-time champions.
I, for one, love the fact than unexpected names are coming through and winning the bigger tournaments. First Raducanu at the US Open and now Norrie or Basilashvilli here. Brilliant! They'll likely put on a good show and it doesn't take two players in the top 5 to make for an entertaining match. More power to them.
Good perspective.A sad state of affairs for who?
The finalists? No, they've played well and beaten their opponents. That's their job and they've done it well. They deserve to be there.
You? Well if you only want your favourites in the final then it says more about your wish for tennis to satisfy you than your appreciation for the sport of tennis as a whole.
The sport? The sport of tennis is bigger than anyone who has ever played or will play and will easily accommodate more first-time champions.
I, for one, love the fact than unexpected names are coming through and winning the bigger tournaments. First Raducanu at the US Open and now Norrie or Basilashvilli here. Brilliant! They'll likely put on a good show and it doesn't take two players in the top 5 to make for an entertaining match. More power to them.
We won’t miss you a bit! Glad you will wallow in your ignorance.I won’t watch it and I suspect many others won’t I will wager a bet this will be the least watched masters in history, sad state of affairs for the game these two in a final
LOLOLOLOL! Just because it isn’t conventionally aesthetic doesn’t mean it isn’t a weapon at a tournament that may be the first when as many backhands have been hit as forehands. Glad I know to listen to qualified analysts like Craig O’Shannessey point out facts rather than pure delusional hunches.Sad state of affairs for Tennis if these two are making masters finals.
You can spin it whichever way you want but what would be usually a first round match between a player with no backhand and a ball basher is not a great advert for Tennis.
Thought you muted me, looks like your knowledge on how to use a Tennis forum is as weak as your knowledge of the game which is non existentWe won’t miss you a bit! Glad you will wallow in your ignorance.
LOLOLOLOL! Just because it isn’t conventionally aesthetic doesn’t mean it isn’t a weapon at a tournament that may be the first when as many backhands have been hit as forehands. Glad I know to listen to qualified analysts like Craig O’Shannessey point out facts rather than pure delusional hunches.
Agreed. Worst Masters final for a while. This is sadly what tennis will be like without big 3 and without any consistency among the other top players. Both these players are challenger level, no way they should come close to a masters final.This as a masters final is a joke! It’s a first round match
Your lack of knowledge of his background is almost as alarming as your snobby attitude about the final. I could share the details but it will fall on deaf ears so I won’t waste my time. Just a hint: no Aussie ties to his background.Agreed. Worst Masters final for a while. This is sadly what tennis will be like without big 3 and without any consistency among the other top players. Both these players are challenger level, no way they should come close to a masters final.
Also why is Norrie listed as British but he has this hybrid Australian/South African accent? What is up with that?
I’ve rarely cared about a big match less. I’ll probably end up watching it and enjoying it. At a push, I’ll cheer for Norrie and then avoid all U.K. sports media for the rest of the year.
Agreed. Worst Masters final for a while. This is sadly what tennis will be like without big 3 and without any consistency among the other top players. Both these players are challenger level, no way they should come close to a masters final.
Also why is Norrie listed as British but he has this hybrid Australian/South African accent? What is up with that?