Struff looks GermanStruffy is destroying Cilic.
Struff looks GermanStruffy is destroying Cilic.
No, I stand by my words. He never beat him in these venues and had match points in 2006, so that indeed was his best chance until now. And now I believe he can beat him, so IMO it has to be his best chance since then.And then you woke up.
I think it is. There's no way a near 38 year old Fed is beating Nadal on clay, no matter how bad Rafa is playing.No, I stand by my words. He never beat him in these venues and had match points in 2006, so that was his best chance indeed. And now I believe he can beat him, so IMO it has to be his best chance since then.
Surely it is because Rafa’s bad clay season, but that doesn’t make my estimation invalid. I just say if they meet this year, Federer has a chance to win. And I don’t think this is far-fetched by any means.
I hope you stopped thinking that he is a bigger favorite than Djokovic.Thiem got all the preparation he needs for the FO, lost to Lajovic, Verdasco and got straight setted by Djokovic.
No, I stand by my words. He never beat him in these venues and had match points in 2006, so that indeed was his best chance until now. And now I believe he can beat him, so IMO it has to be his best chance since then.
Surely it is because Rafa’s bad clay season, but that doesn’t make my estimation invalid. I just say if they meet this year, Federer has a chance to win. And I don’t think this is far-fetched by any means.
It's unlikely for sure, but Rafa isn't nearly as scary as he used to be. Nobody's afraid of that forehand anymore.I think it is. There's no way a near 38 year old Fed is beating Nadal on clay, no matter how bad Rafa is playing.
Tennis logic dictated he should have been. But of course, these 90's born players are breaking every tennis rule as far as the younger guys are concerned.I hope you stopped thinking that he is a bigger favorite than Djokovic.
If Nadal does not improve then Federer can beat him for sure. He had match points against Thiem who plays much better than Nadal this year.I think it is. There's no way a near 38 year old Fed is beating Nadal on clay, no matter how bad Rafa is playing.
I hope you stopped thinking that he is a bigger favorite than Djokovic.
I wouldn't say much better.If Nadal does not improve then Federer can beat him for sure. He had match points against Thiem who plays much better than Nadal this year.
Good that you forgotDamn I forgot to bet 2 bucks on Chardy. Is it too late for him to make a comeback?
@I Am Finnish
Thiem gained his clay reputation by beating an old Nadal 4 times on the surface. That's it.Dominic Thiem's 2019 claycourt season heading into Roland Garros:
Buenos Aires SF (lost to Schwartzman)
Rio R32 (lost to Djere)
Monte Carlo R16 (lost to Lajovic)
Barcelona W (beats Nadal SF)
Madrid SF (lost to Djokovic)
Rome R32 (just lost to Verdasco)
Will win RGDominic Thiem's 2019 claycourt season heading into Roland Garros:
Buenos Aires SF (lost to Schwartzman)
Rio R32 (lost to Djere)
Monte Carlo R16 (lost to Lajovic)
Barcelona W (beats Nadal SF)
Madrid SF (lost to Djokovic)
Rome R32 (just lost to Verdasco)
So basically all the hype comes from Thiem beating a crapola Nadal in Barcelona and losing a close straight set match to Djokovic?Dominic Thiem's 2019 claycourt season heading into Roland Garros:
Buenos Aires SF (lost to Schwartzman)
Rio R32 (lost to Djere)
Monte Carlo R16 (lost to Lajovic)
Barcelona W (beats Nadal SF)
Madrid SF (lost to Djokovic)
Rome R32 (just lost to Verdasco)
Thiem plays against Fedr, is surprisingly clutch.Thiem gets put in Roger's quarter:
Plays some characteristically excellent clay court tennis throughout the tournament, and plays line licking shots to clutch past Roger who also plays well.
Thiem gets put in Nadal's quarter:
Gets wrecked in the 2nd round.
Fraud curseThiem plays against Fedr, is surprisingly clutch.
Thiem plays against somebody who isn't Fedr, he plays like a mug when it matters.
Fedr brings out the best in people.
They aren't even in the same halfVerdasco was motivated after listening Kyrgios interview
Mantilla is a great player so it's okay.The way Fedr's game looks in Rome, I'm salty that he lost to freaking Mantilla in the 2003 final.
Why in 2017? He beat him everywhere else that year (what he never achieved before, not even close to this kind of dominance) and didn’t play clay since then. Firstly it is not clear how the new dynamics of the matchup transform to clay and secondly Nadal is clearly worse than in 2017 everywhere, but especially on clay.As much as I would like to see Fed beat Raf on clay, I think that ship has sailed in 2017.
More beatable than his other final opponents, though.Mantilla is a great player so it's okay.
Chardy has a BP, there's my chance to become a millionaire@tennis_pro Nadal might bagel him
Why in 2017? He beat him everywhere else that year (what he never achieved before, not even close to this kind of dominance) and didn’t play clay since then. Firstly it is not clear how the new dynamics of the matchup transform to clay and secondly Nadal is clearly worse than in 2017 everywhere, but especially on clay.
2004 was shameful too.More beatable than his other final opponents, though.
2007 as well.2004 was shameful too.
In mc cilic barely defeated struffI knew Cilic was out of form but a total of 4 games against Struff? LOL it's time to rethink life
Not anymore.oof bp for sousa
Thiem gets put in Roger's quarter:
Plays some characteristically excellent clay court tennis throughout the tournament, and plays line licking shots to clutch past Roger who also plays well.
Thiem gets put in Nadal's quarter:
Gets wrecked in the 2nd round.
Thiem really did not play that well though. Played well in Barcelona but played pretty muggish against both Federer and Djokovic.Thiem plays against Fedr, is surprisingly clutch.
Thiem plays against somebody who isn't Fedr, he plays like a mug when it matters.
Fedr brings out the best in people.
Meh, RAFA would have been waiting.2007 as well.