Fed is the only person in this era with the chance of beating Pete on a grass court, and few at that.Sampras-djokovic would have been very one sided. Djoker don’t like second serve aces
Yeah, he loses first sets on purpose. lolTo anyone raising their hopes... stop it.
Novak is doing to Nick what he does to all opponents... luring him in to a false sense of security...
Hence why they said accusedNick's innocent until proven guilty
What false sense of insecurity? Novak hasn’t been good this wimbledon. Now we will see if kyrgios will crumble or keep the pressure.
Still accused of domestic violence with a court date next month. Royals tried to avoid having a Russian/Belarussian even if they had denounced the war but here they are. A photo with a guy with a court date for domestic violence. Must be good for Princess Kate's domestic violence charities?!?Nick's innocent until proven guilty
Well Gill got his prediction right for the first time. He had said Novak in 4. He usually gets them wrong. I was just basing on his track record.Oops
Yeah, he loses first sets on purpose. lol
Get on FuboTV with their free trial and do it off ESPN through themany working streams ?
Only one after him coming outWell they've had years of photos with him as a champ so they already had that on their file.
He let him win the set? Nah, Djokovic played well. Going down a set definitely wasn't the plan. Novak still the favourite a set down, but only slightly...To anyone raising their hopes... stop it.
Novak is doing to Nick what he does to all opponents... luring him in to a false sense of security...
No one can serve like this the entire match. Even if he does, Novak is now getting a read on the Nick serve. Last game he got to Deuce. Pretty soon he will break.I don’t see what Djokovic can do on Nick’s serve tbh
What false sense of insecurity? Novak hasn’t been good this wimbledon. Now we will see if kyrgios will crumble or keep the pressure.
And he's facing the superior player, the fitter player, plus the more experienced and mentally superior player. The only two things Nick does better than Novak is serve and a better volley. But he rarely comes in, so that's not going to be a factor. He'll have to play the match of his career to take the title unless Djokovic comes out totally flat. Could happen, but unlikely.
Do you really give Nick a decent chance? Djoker is the heavy favorite, Nick would have to throw in the performance of his life and not lose focus for 3+ hours. That's a big ask for him, or any first-time slam finalist.
All you haters who never saw more than 2 minutes of Nick actually playing have their predictions in ruins: "he's going to rage and clown and implode!" Those of us who actually have watched him play over the last 8 years were right that he would be calm as could be today.
How can you lose when they can't return the save no?Motivated Kyrgios >>> Peak hypothetical Safin
He's about to lose 3 today.Nick has never lost a set to Djokovic
Wynter, my god is that you? It feels like it's been years! Welcome back!Is that 10 aces already?
Motivated Kyrgios >>> Peak hypothetical Safin
He let him win the set? Nah, Djokovic played well. Going down a set definitely wasn't the plan. Novak still the favourite a set down, but only slightly...
Nick has never lost a set to Djokovic
I didnt expect nick coming out playing his best, honestly, he is definetly made for big matches, you think djokovic will win in 4?Well Gill got his prediction right for the first time. He had said Novak in 4. He usually gets them wrong. I was just basing on his track record.
Like in 2019 AO - Gill said Nadal would win in 3 or 4. Novak won in 3.
FO 2022 Gill said Novak would win, but Nadal did.