Danielle Collins sets Djokovic straight over US Open concerns

Tennease

Legend

Tennis star Danielle Collins sets Novak Djokovic straight over US Open concerns

June 11, 2020 7:07am


.

Howie Kussoy
New York Post
Novak Djokovic can afford to skip the US Open.
The world’s top-ranked male tennis star doesn’t need to work another day in his life. But no other player in the world has over $AUD205 million in career earnings to fall back on.

American Danielle Collins, the 51st-ranked player in the WTA, called out Djokovic for having a bloated entourage and being out of touch with the financial security of fellow players, following the 17-time grand slam champion’s comments that he — and others — might not play the US Open because its proposed safety protocol to combat the spread of COVID-19 is too “extreme”

Collins, 26, has never advanced past the second round of the US Open, and has earned over $3.5 million as a pro. Djokovic, the three-time US Open champion, has collected more money on the court than any player in the sport’s history.

“This is a serious contradiction to previous comments about having players … inside the top 100 donate money to players outside of the top 250,” Collins wrote to Djokovic online.

“No one has been able to play sanctioned events or make money since February. Here we have an awesome opportunity with the US Open talking about proceeding forward with the event, with some strict safety precautions to make sure all players feel safe and their health is put first.

“This is a massive opportunity for players to start making money again, and here we have the top player in the world saying only being able to bring one person with (him) will be too difficult be able to bring his entourage.”

Currently, the US Open is scheduled to begin on August 31. Wimbledon was cancelled for the first time since World War II due to COVID-19 but if the tournament in New York is held, international players would need to quarantine for 14 days upon landing in the US.

Once arriving in Queens, players would be restricted to certain courts, be permitted to bring just one person to a match, stay at hotels near the Flushing site and be prohibited from going to Manhattan.


“If it’s safe to play, and the USTA, WTA and ATP do everything in their ability to prioritise the health of the players, I think we should support that,” Collins said.

“It’s easy when someone’s made $US150 million ($AUD 205m) throughout their career to try and tell people what to do with their money, and then turn down playing in the US Open.

“For those of us (most tennis players) who don’t travel with an entourage, we actually need to start working again. It would be nice to have the best player in the world supporting this opportunity and not spoiling it for the players and the fans!”
In addition to reluctance to travel to what became the global epicentre of the coronavirus pandemic, some players also are torn about playing the US Open because the French Open — usually played in May — has been postponed to the week after New York’s grand slam concludes.

“Nothing is certain yet, a final decision is expected by the end of the month,” Djokovic told Serbian broadcaster RTS.

“At the moment the measures in force are very severe … These are pretty extreme conditions and I don’t know if they are sustainable. Most of the players I’ve talked to so far have a rather negative view of the possibility of going.

“Of course, we would all like to return to the courts as soon as possible and play tournaments, the ones before the US Open and the US Open and I hope they will take place but there has to be a compromise between the organisers and the players. We’ll see if it will happen.”
This article first appeared on the New York Post and was reproduced with permission

 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
Once again...

tenor.gif
 
D

Deleted member 768841

Guest
Fed got knee-a-sitis at just the right time.
I imagine he’s talking with his coach/PR group...

Fed: “So with all these nobody’s from outside the top 100, im worried I’m going to get cancelled.”

Pr group: “Well, Mr. Federer, uh, well, If we say your knee is injured, all the tennis blogs will leave you alone and attack Djokovi- I mean He Who Must Not Be Named.”

Fed: “Get it done. And tell Bill I’m happy to play with him whenever he likes.”
 

Federev

Legend
I imagine he’s talking with his coach/PR group...

Fed: “So with all these nobody’s from outside the top 100, im worried I’m going to get cancelled.”

Pr group: “Well, Mr. Federer, uh, well, If we say your knee is injured, all the tennis blogs will leave you alone and attack Djokovi- I mean He Who Must Not Be Named.”

Fed: “Get it done. And tell Bill I’m happy to play with him whenever he likes”
“Get it done”. LOL!!!
 

Federev

Legend
This is the season where even a hint of “elite” gets you an instant character assassination from some folks.

Novak - kind of short sightedly- did not have his PR-filter on and he’ll have to pay a bit for that.

Cause it doesn’t matter if you’ve “earned it” or not. The whole system is condemned in some eyes and to have much more than others is already inherently a crime to them.

It’s French Revolution time.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 770618

Guest
But having the US Open followed by the French in the fall would be epic, no?
 
D

Deleted member 768841

Guest
But having the US Open followed by the French in the fall would be epic, no?
I’m not hopeful most players will go straight from US open to French Open, however I think those most committed to winning (Nadal, Djokovic) will grab them rest of the slams this year.
 
J

joohan

Guest
I think Djokers absence will help some people earn some more money in the end. I mean, if tournament goes ahead then prize money is set regardless of who turns up. It’s not a stock market and stock won’t plummet just because a CEO of tennis does not show up. If he’s not there, poor Daniel Evanses might actually have a looksy into the second round.

What’s miss Collins angle I don’t know. Will USO be canceled because Novak doesn’t like the idea? I guess not so I don’t understand what the fuss is about.
 

mikej

Hall of Fame
1) if you don’t know who Danielle Collins is you’re not that much of a tennis fan - sure, she’s no superstar, but she’s won multiple NCAA titles / reached the semis of Miami and AusOpen / been top 25 / beat Svitolina 1,1 / etc

2) she’s right, and Djokovic really needs a new PR person - he’s making so many media unforced errors during this Covid break - the type of errors Nadal and Federer rarely make, thus their much bigger followings - really, complaining about limitations of your entourage size while others are trying to get back to making a living on tour?
 

Gary Duane

G.O.A.T.
Danielle Collins is just another semi-successful jock who does not understand how the world works. The big 3 are all rich and famous. The rich and famous live in a different reality, where they have no financial worries and know they can coast the rest of their lives on the money they've already made. They never have to work again, and they know that.

We would think the same way if we had their money and security. The only difference between one rich and famous person and the next is how well developed his PR filter is functioning. Roger and Rafa are pretty good at censoring their opinions. Nadal may actually be the most careful. Novak is more likely to blurt out what he really thinks and feels. That just means his diplomatic sense is less highly developed, not that he is less kind, moral or caring.

Other than that, they are all used to VIP treatment, and in that way they are extremely entitled. Past champions would laugh at the idea that they only way you can win is to travel with a team taking care of your needs every second. Read about the pro tour in the 50s and early 60s to find out what top players then had to put up with. Compared with those tough stars today's elite are incredibly spoiled and pampered. But it's not their fault. It's just the new reality, the era of jocks who live like the royalty of the past.
 

skaj

Legend
Danielle Collins is just another semi-successful jock who does not understand how the world works. The big 3 are all rich and famous. The rich and famous live in a different reality, where they have no financial worries and know they can coast the rest of their lives on the money they've already made. They never have to work again, and they know that.

We would think the same way if we had their money and security. The only difference between one rich and famous person and the next is how well developed his PR filter is functioning. Roger and Rafa are pretty good at censoring their opinions. Nadal may actually be the most careful. Novak is more likely to blurt out what he really thinks and feels. That just means his diplomatic sense is less highly developed, not that he is less kind, moral or caring.

Other than that, they are all used to VIP treatment, and in that way they are extremely entitled. Past champions would laugh at the idea that they only way you can win is to travel with a team taking care of your needs every second. Read about the pro tour in the 50s and early 60s to find out what top players then had to put up with. Compared with those tough stars today's elite are incredibly spoiled and pampered. But it's not their fault. It's just the new reality, the era of jocks who live like the royalty of the past.



The amount of money someone has does not determine their way of thinking. There are moral, empathetic people among the wealthy.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
Yes, Novak is a pampered star, all of the big 3 are. However, everyone's missing the fact that he still said in the interview that if the majority of players want to play in those conditions, he'd accept them. He basically stated how he views things but that he will not go against the majority.

And yes it's annoying how internet gives every bozo an overweighted sense of importance and weight to their opinion.
 

Gary Duane

G.O.A.T.
The amount of money someone has does not determine their way of thinking. There are moral, empathetic people among the wealthy.
Name one. Tell me how you know. Show me someone with a ton of money who actually gives it away, most of it, not just donating an amount that really make no difference in his/her lifestyle. I know no one like you are talking about, only a few people with a lot of money who talk a good game.
 

ZYW

Rookie
I don't get it. She can choose to play regardless of what Djokovic said. Djokovic doesn't decide if the tournament plays or not.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
The amount of money someone has does not determine their way of thinking. There are moral, empathetic people among the wealthy.

Maybe, but it would be exceedingly rare. They just don't have anywhere near the same perspective as your average joe. Fame, power, money etc. changes people, whether acquired or born into it.

I'm talking about genuine empathy and morality here, not Social Media activism or giving speeches about climate change while riding around the world in your private jet.
 

Gary Duane

G.O.A.T.
Yes, Novak is a pampered star, all of the big 3 are. However, everyone's missing the fact that he still said in the interview that if the majority of players want to play in those conditions, he'd accept them. He basically stated how he views things but that he will not go against the majority.

And yes it's annoying how internet gives every bozo an overweighted sense of importance and weight to their opinion.
You know the saying: "It must be right, because someone on the Internet said so." :)
 

Gary Duane

G.O.A.T.
Maybe, but it would be exceedingly rare. They just don't have anywhere near the same perspective as your average joe. Fame, power, money etc. changes people, whether acquired or born into it.

I'm talking about genuine empathy and morality here, not Social Media activism or giving speeches about climate change while riding around the world in your private jet.
It's like the power elites who give lip service to every liberal cause while privately living pampered, entitles lives.

The average Senator is 62 years old.


If you wonder how worried these people are about losing a job, or suffering, the answer is simple: they have to pose to the rest of us, to get reelected, but their only concern is staying locked down and safe - and keep their jobs.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
You know the saying: "It must be right, because someone on the Internet said so." :)

Yep, jumping at conclusions based on sensationalistic headlines or out of context quotes is distrubingly common these days.

Who has time to watch the whole interview (even if it's 4-5 minutes long)? Just grab the pitchforks.
 

Tennease

Legend
This pandemic problem is a very serious matter. It's not over yet and is getting worse globally. Athletes should be careful and follow the social distancing regulations, no matter if you're rich and famous or not. Everyone should help to prevent the spread of the virus.

You think you're healthy and feel ok to gather with your team who look healthy too, but you could be carrying the virus without showing any symptoms at all and can potentially spread the virus more.
 
Last edited:
This whole situation shows how much disarray exist in the tennis governing bodies. Who is really making the calls, who is the decision maker. The players!? The tournaments!? The ATP!? If the Big 3 are the ones behind decisions like these, then dammit!! Maybe tennis really needs some sort of a commissioner after all! ;)
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
The USTA runs the USO and they control the agenda. The players can merely complain, which is what Djokovic is doing. The whole thing is a storm in a teacup.
 

skaj

Legend
Name one. Tell me how you know. Show me someone with a ton of money who actually gives it away, most of it, not just donating an amount that really make no difference in his/her lifestyle. I know no one like you are talking about, only a few people with a lot of money who talk a good game.

Although I agree that most wealthy people are pathologically selfish, that is how most of them got their wealth, I think it is rigid, limiting and too pessimistic to think that they are all the same. Not to mention thinking that "We would think the same way if we had their money and security.", what a horrible statement. I don't follow the scene, but I remember that the owner of DM has given most of his wealth to charities. He also advocates basic income. And you can have a lifestyle that allows you to give the most of your money away, unless your lifestyle is bizarrely opulent(as lifestyles of those people often are, unfortunately).
Anyway, more importantly, even if they were all the same, then more reason to talk about that publicly and criticize it, instead of criticizing the criticizers and saying that they don't understand the (inevitable)reality.
 

skaj

Legend
Maybe, but it would be exceedingly rare. They just don't have anywhere near the same perspective as your average joe. Fame, power, money etc. changes people, whether acquired or born into it.

I'm talking about genuine empathy and morality here, not Social Media activism or giving speeches about climate change while riding around the world in your private jet.

I agree, but even if there's none, than we have even more reasons to criticize all of it. And I don't think that that money, power changes people in that direction necessarily, most of those people were like that to begin with, that is how they get to their money. Those born into it were usually brought up that way(but it's not rare that they start rebelling against the system at one point, when they realize how unfair it is).
 

NonP

Legend
Is everyone trying to create a new USO/FO thread now? I step aside for a few hours and now we seem to have like a dozen threads on the same topic. This one is admittedly is a somewhat different case but geez.

Anyhoo the replies:

1) if you don’t know who Danielle Collins is you’re not that much of a tennis fan - sure, she’s no superstar, but she’s won multiple NCAA titles / reached the semis of Miami and AusOpen / been top 25 / beat Svitolina 1,1 / etc

2) she’s right, and Djokovic really needs a new PR person - he’s making so many media unforced errors during this Covid break - the type of errors Nadal and Federer rarely make, thus their much bigger followings - really, complaining about limitations of your entourage size while others are trying to get back to making a living on tour?

Right, Collins is hardly a nobody. It's funny to see her being dissed as such in a friggin' tennis forum no less.

And it's actually Novak's very tendency to speak off the cuff that endeared him to me, but yeah he really could use a new PR team especially now. I'll cut him some slack on this gaffe but spouting anti-vaxxer talking points was not only grossly irresponsible but monumentally stupid. If the backlash makes him rethink his deeply misguided stance, good, but definitely no good from a PR standpoint.

Danielle Collins is just another semi-successful jock who does not understand how the world works. The big 3 are all rich and famous. The rich and famous live in a different reality, where they have no financial worries and know they can coast the rest of their lives on the money they've already made. They never have to work again, and they know that.

We would think the same way if we had their money and security. The only difference between one rich and famous person and the next is how well developed his PR filter is functioning. Roger and Rafa are pretty good at censoring their opinions. Nadal may actually be the most careful. Novak is more likely to blurt out what he really thinks and feels. That just means his diplomatic sense is less highly developed, not that he is less kind, moral or caring.

Other than that, they are all used to VIP treatment, and in that way they are extremely entitled. Past champions would laugh at the idea that they only way you can win is to travel with a team taking care of your needs every second. Read about the pro tour in the 50s and early 60s to find out what top players then had to put up with. Compared with those tough stars today's elite are incredibly spoiled and pampered. But it's not their fault. It's just the new reality, the era of jocks who live like the royalty of the past.

It's one thing to note this is how the world works, quite another to leave it at that while doing nothing to change the status quo. It's an admittedly dubious American tradition dating as far back as Citizen Kane at least, but thankfully enough people have resisted the smug cynicism and fought to bring about meaningful change instead. In fact we're seeing the latest manifestation of that less popular but more venerable tradition right now.

She just wants her 5 minutes I'd reckon. Like that other player that went after Thiem.

Just about everyone wants their "5 minutes." If we tried to dismiss anyone's opinion as less than 100% pure altruism no amount of progress would be possible. And Collins was well within her rights to take Novak to task for his contradiction in calling for a players' fund while stonewalling on the very thing that makes most of said players' livelihood.
 
J

joohan

Guest
Danielle Collins is just another semi-successful jock who does not understand how the world works. The big 3 are all rich and famous. The rich and famous live in a different reality, where they have no financial worries and know they can coast the rest of their lives on the money they've already made. They never have to work again, and they know that.

We would think the same way if we had their money and security. The only difference between one rich and famous person and the next is how well developed his PR filter is functioning. Roger and Rafa are pretty good at censoring their opinions. Nadal may actually be the most careful. Novak is more likely to blurt out what he really thinks and feels. That just means his diplomatic sense is less highly developed, not that he is less kind, moral or caring.

Other than that, they are all used to VIP treatment, and in that way they are extremely entitled. Past champions would laugh at the idea that they only way you can win is to travel with a team taking care of your needs every second. Read about the pro tour in the 50s and early 60s to find out what top players then had to put up with. Compared with those tough stars today's elite are incredibly spoiled and pampered. But it's not their fault. It's just the new reality, the era of jocks who live like the royalty of the past.

I’m not saying you’re not right to a point but I guess all the entourage Novak, Roger and Rafa surrounds themselves with does one thing first and foremost - help them perform to their best capability. I don’t think Novak won’t come just because he can’t bring his personal hair stylist or what. He (as well as other top guys as I remember) have their way of preparations that include, you guessed it, their personal fitness coaches, physios and co. I highly doubt Roger would say that some random fitness trainer (whoever he is and however qualified he may be) is OK instead of his Paganini (not his personal violinist, for the record...).

I admit it would be interesting to see the top guys take on the rest of the Tour without their regular service/with what the rest usually make do but, on the other hand, if they choose not to turn up, it actually might not be just because they walk around with palladium spoons up their colons.

Novak has said some weird stuff lately but I personally like him a bit more as a result. Not because what he says but because he’s obviously being himself. Refreshing.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
Just about everyone wants their "5 minutes." If we tried to dismiss anyone's opinion as less than 100% pure altruism no amount of progress would be possible. And Collins was well within her rights to take Novak to task for his contradiction in calling for a players' fund while stonewalling on the very thing that makes most of said players' livelihood.

What progress are we talking about here exactly? These are not normal circumstances. There's not a clear right or wrong answer on whether a massive event like USO should take place.

I watched the whole of Novak's interview in Serbian, it was not nearly as elitistic as portrayed here, was pretty measured on the whole actually. He even ended it with basically saying that if majority of players want the tourney to be held on so they can earn their livelihood, he'll go along with it.
 

LeftyMagic

Rookie
theyll turn anything into a news story at this point including Collins opinion...what does she care if the tour has Jokers support. they dont have rafas support either (but no one will dare call rafa out) Id be happy if either wasn’t in the draw if I were on the mens side. Two less big guns to face. You dont need their support to get the tournament approved. I love how mad ppl are at novak cause he wants his team there, his chef etc. all the things he gained by winning more than others and making more money than the others. if thats the only way he can show up then let him miss the tournament who cares. Collins isnt “feisty” cause she attacks the easiest of the big tennis stars to hate on, give me a break


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top