TearTheRoofOff
G.O.A.T.
@Federer and Del Potro approved.We are watching crap tennis. Berdych was better than this.
@Federer and Del Potro approved.We are watching crap tennis. Berdych was better than this.
Again, I don't disagree, but I want confirmation. It is unlikely that I will be around to discuss this with you in 20 years. I'm too old. But I think we need to see what happens. As I have pointed out before, in the early open era it looked as though players like Gonzalez, Rosewall and Laver would go on dominating forever. And to be honest, if they had had the science we have today, and the training, and the physios, and the shoes - don't forget the shoes! - and the miracle surgery, those three might have still been giving more problems to Connors and his group. When Connors started winning it was as if everything flipped almost overnight. I'm ready to believe that 30 is the new 25, and 25 is the new 20. But the fact remains that until a few years ago the sweet spot for winning slams remained age 24, right at the beginning of that. So until I assume that 30 and above is going to be the new normal age for slam winners I have to see that stay that way for a decade.Dear Gary, I think that we largely agree, maybe we just view age scale differently. I believe that 30s are new 20s and that 40s will become new 30s in tennis. In my opinion, game is so complex now that time is required to fully develop.
Remove Roddick from this list, I can't find any article or match stat putting his FH higher than 2800s average.Federer,Roddick,Nadal,Gonzolez even Ancic from that era has been clocked at higher averages at lower 3000s throughout a match and for Nadal and Federer mid to high 3000s. For Nadal against Mathieu in RG 2006, It was 3700s for a set.
Stopped reading there.It is my honest opinion that the best Wimbledon version of Federer is the one in 2019.
Here's another fun game: let's try to guess how many games the Diamond age gems will win in each set against Nadal at next three FOs.At this rate Djokovic will be winning slams in 2027.
Again, I don't disagree, but I want confirmation. It is unlikely that I will be around to discuss this with you in 20 years. I'm too old. But I think we need to see what happens. As I have pointed out before, in the early open era it looked as though players like Gonzalez, Rosewall and Laver would go on dominating forever. And to be honest, if they had had the science we have today, and the training, and the physios, and the shoes - don't forget the shoes! - and the miracle surgery, those three might have still been giving more problems to Connors and his group. When Connors started winning it was as if everything flipped almost overnight. I'm ready to believe that 30 is the new 25, and 25 is the new 20. But the fact remains that until a few years ago the sweet spot for winning slams remained age 24, right at the beginning of that. So until I assume that 30 and above is going to be the new normal age for slam winners I have to see that stay that way for a decade.
In short, I'm leaning your way, but I'm cautious because over just a few years all sorts of anomalies can appear normal or permanent before they reverse.
Color me cautious.
No one's forcing you to watch it.This is ridiculous.
Tsits is supposed to be the next great? Yeah right.
Never want to hear how Fed had it easy.
Djoker has it as easy as it gets.
Trash tennis being played. No All Time Greats present except for Djoker.
Djoker is two or three tiers above what we are seeing.
Tennis is in deep deep trouble.
Why can't most Fed fans be so frankly and realistic?the tennis is fine, just like there was a lot of fine tennis back in 04–07. The problem is merely that Djokovic is so much better than the rest now that he's an odds-on favorite even before a slam begins, much like Federer was in the pomp of the Hewitt-Roddick era. Some more parity would make for make for more excitement, now like then.
True... In my youth I loved one candy, and after that haven't ate it probably about 2 decades... One day I saw commercial on TV, candy emerged in shop after long time... I was very excited to taste it again, but when I did I realized it's just an candy as many others I ate all this time..."Over time due to nostalgia people tend to see the past in rose colored glasses. The passage of time would make them forget the bad stuff and remember only the good stuff. People predominantly tend to view the past good."
Why can't most Fed fans be so frankly and realistic?
"Over time due to nostalgia people tend to see the past in rose colored glasses. The passage of time would make them forget the bad stuff and remember only the good stuff. People predominantly tend to view the past good."
True... In my youth I loved one candy, and after that haven't ate it probably about 2 decades... One day I saw commercial on TV, candy emerged in shop after long time... I was very excited to taste it again, but when I did I realized it's just an candy as many others I ate all this time...
Hey you forgot to put glasses, go edit the post quickly... Stressful times for big part of ttw... Relax it's just a game...It is because most people that know their tennis know that the above description was far from "realistic".
Hey you forgot to put glasses, go edit the post quickly... Stressful times for big part of ttw... Relax it's just a game...
Mug sport huh?Without doubt the weakest year in history. Tsitsipas is already 22 and still choking like crazy against nobodies like Coric.
Lol someone’s worried that Djokovic is breaking feds records hahaThis is ridiculous.
Tsits is supposed to be the next great? Yeah right.
Never want to hear how Fed had it easy.
Djoker has it as easy as it gets.
Trash tennis being played. No All Time Greats present except for Djoker.
Djoker is two or three tiers above what we are seeing.
Tennis is in deep deep trouble.
That will suit me very nice. Djokovic is breaking all them recordsIt really is a bit ridiculous how weak the NextGen are. Fed and Nadal have benefitted from it too, but it's almost 2021!! Come on guys, wake up! Literally no one has broken through the big 4 generation except Stan. At this rate Djokovic will be winning slams in 2027.
Federer won Slams in WEAK ERA.Excellent post.
This is the WEAKEST ERA in 35 years of watching tennis. These next gen make Roddick, Hewitt, Safin look like GODS.
If someone EVER tells me that Fed won slams in a WEAK ERA -- I will SCREAM.
If Fed had a weak era, what is this exactly? Is this even an era?
It will be epic when Novak breaks the slam recordThe Nextgen's level is almost there, just the consistency is a joke
Was it the same level that we see in in-form Fed vs peak Djokovic matches? Was it in anyway comparable to the AO 2012 final between Djokovic and Nadal? We're talking completely different levels here.Tsitsipas lacked clutchness, to say the least. But it was a great tennis match, periodt.
Hahah that's hilarious. You do realise Federer was in his prime in that era, right? What kind of technical faults do you see there?There is a great comedy value in claims that Djokovic has/had it easy. If you take time machine and put Tonight's Tsistipas in 2005, the question is whether he would lose a match for the season; players playing then had obvious technical faults. Coric vs Tsitsipas was an extraordinary match; the level of play in this USO is incredible.
But let's actually not accept Tsitsipas as a failure yet. I don't exactly like him but he actually will end up being quite successful and he has enough potential to becme a multi slam winner.
Yeah I just want to djoker to get us open then it’s been an awesome year and run. He’d have 18 slams and 4 us opens. He can just play freely then on clay with nothing to lose. All the pressure would be on Rafa.Well I hope they don't defeat him here. After this tournament, I would be glad for them to get a win. lol
Can you tell me who is in your avatar? He kind of looks like Safin in a suit, but definitely isn't him is he?Federer won Slams in WEAK ERA.
Glasses back... Glad to see you are fine now... All best to you...There is no need to even say that I am relaxed. Mostly I am enjoying the lunacy around here. It shall pass eventually, but until then ...
GOAT of weak era, Federer did way worse upto Tsitsipas age.Tsitsi is not a failure. He just doesn't live up to even moderate expectations as of now, especially considering the hopes for him to become an ATG.
The thing is, the talk is about the state of the tour now, not in the future. What he becomes later has no relevance to his results now.
The great thing is all them guys are on the other side of the draw too! HahaDjokovic isn’t being challenged hence why he looks so sharp, and he does look insanely sharp.
But he isn’t being tested.
Look how Struff rolled over in that last set. He couldn’t wait for it to be over.
The youngsters all reek of fear when they face Djokovic.
Without Federer and Nadal, only Medvedev, Thiem and RBA even look like they are up for the scrap when it comes to Djoker.
The rest are like origami; fold under pressure.
Tsitsipas is 22 yo now. Federer won his first slam at 22 yo. So if Tsitsipas win slam at 22 does that mean Fed career has no relevance too?Tsitsi is not a failure. He just doesn't live up to even moderate expectations as of now, especially considering the hopes for him to become an ATG.
The thing is, the talk is about the state of the tour now, not in the future. What he becomes later has no relevance to his results now.
Yeah, I always joke that it’s Safin if someone asks. French dark techno artist Gesaffelstein.Can you tell me who is in your avatar? He kind of looks like Safin in a suit, but definitely isn't him is he?
GOAT of weak era, Federer did way worse upto Tsitsipas age.
GOAT of weak era, Federer did way worse upto Tsitsipas age.
Glasses back... Glad to see you are fine now... All best to you...
the tennis is fine, just like there was a lot of fine tennis back in 04–07. The problem is merely that Djokovic is so much better than the rest now that he's an odds-on favorite even before a slam begins, much like Federer was in the pomp of the Hewitt-Roddick era. Some more parity would make for make for more excitement, now like then.
Maybe they're complaining because they are just seeing a bunch of 'babies'. Since tennis players peak at 33+, Djokovic is the only one playing peak tennis.Lots of youth and depth of field in this Slam, I don't know what these people complain about.
Tsitsipas is 22 yo now. Federer won his first slam at 22 yo. So if Tsitsipas win slam at 22 does that mean Fed career has no relevance too?
You... Are... So... Funny...
Implying/asserting the current top level is anything like peak Federer (or Nadal or Djokovic himself at their peaks) is kind of royally insulting though.
You are curiously basing your interpretation of how people feel on a simple emoticon. The last phrase ... curious tendency among the Djokovic base. Similar to your idol's fake "Amor y Paz".
I expected better answer... I guess s.h.i.t that you put yourself in post I quoted was too deep... Next time better think of what you are writing...Yes, at 22 Federer was considered to have an ATG game.
I wish you Amor y Paz in your next post.
Have to agree. Next Gen lack heart, but also lack variety. They are all mainly serve and FH. Tsitsipas got totally exposed as having no BH and i shall call it now, he will never win a Major. The technical issues on that wing were there for all to see and expect other players to mercilessly target it. The good news for Nadal and Federer fans is they both should be able to bag a few more Majors. Djokovic will have the odd dip so all three could realistically aim for a few more. They have a clear run.We are watching crap tennis. Berdych was better than this.
I expected better answer... I guess *** that you put yourself in post I quoted was too deep... Next time better think of what you are writing...