So 6 UE are proof that he was playing well? That's the most laughable thing I've heard,that just shows that he didn't take any risks. Novak had 14 UE but 31 winners. Nadal made 13 winners in 2 sets. That's 6 per set. In his match with davydenko he made 9 winners in 2 sets. Those are pusher stats. Nadal of old,even on HC,would counterpunch,he would actually try to do something,with varying success of course. By comparison he made 28 winners/5 UE against Tsonga in 2 sets. That's playing well and mind you,he didn't play lights out yesterday because tsonga did have BP's.
Obviously DelPo,Djoker,other big hitters/big servers would have success against Rafa most of the time no matter how his form is. Let's forget about those guys for a while. But come on,struggling against guys like over the hill Blake(twice),Ljubicic,Baghdatis,getting broken by freaking mathieu(biggest choker ever),almost losing to almagro and robredo doesn't indicate great form,quite the contrary. I would expect young Rafa to struggle on HC against these guys,not a fresh HC GS champion. A guy who beats one top 10 player in 5-6 months and struggles in every tournament he enters isn't in great form. He had 3 very good matches in all these months after recovery: with berdych,monfils and tsonga.
Nadal got by all these months by willpower alone,because his game has been seriously lacking. Take away his ability to hang on and Nadal would have exited tournaments a lot faster with this type of mediocre/pusher game.
.
