Man y'all are just getting
savage with Murray. I don't usually dive into this convo cuz I feel he unjustly gets the punching-bag treatment while defending him brings its own booby traps, but I'll add that he's roughly equal to Courier in my book where they sit at the top of non-6+ Slammers (OE) along with Nastase. Ilie's game may be flashier and Jim's peak higher, but as Rosewall and Evert (
plus moi) will tell you consistency has its own rewards and that's where he's got every one of his peers beat.
One more digression on the depth of the '90s. Since most of you probably skipped
my earlier dissertation on the historic nature of Mac's '84 season here again are some of the most statistically dominant seasons in men's tennis history (hat tip to
@pc1 for the details), in terms of GW%:
1937 Budge - 64.14% (982/1531)
1938 Budge - 62.70% (780/1244)
1978 Borg - 65.54% (from UTS so excludes TBs)
1980 Borg - 65.50% (ditto)
1984 McEnroe - 65.32% (1279/1958)
1995 Agassi - 61.51% (1192/1938)
2004 Federer - 61.88% (1245/2012)
2006 Federer - 61.72% (1556/2521)
2015 Djokovic - 62.68% (1369/2184)
As you can see Dre sticks out like a sore thumb even though his % is comparable to Fed's or Novak's. Now the easy explanation is that these #s are misleading cuz he's not on par with the Big 3, but you can see how circular this rationale is. Sure, Dre won a measly 8 majors in his career so he can't begin to compare to the 20-timers... even though the seasonal GW%s suggest otherwise... but we can dismiss them because... he just wasn't good enough!
So let's take a closer look. Right off the bat we can say his '95 AO was fully legit. How come? 'Cause only
his '03 self won a higher GW% Down Under in the entire OE (champs only)... and that was vs. not-so-world-beating Schuttler in the final... as opposed to Pete friggin' Sampras in '95... and Kafelnikov (QF) was no pushover that year, either!
That's only the 1st major of the year. Now comes the weakest link, which shows Dre losing to Yevgeny this time at RG. No doubt a "bad" loss by GOAT standards... except that '95 was Muster's very best season where
he won 62.0% of his games and finished with a strong
64.5% at RG. Compare those %s with '06 Rafa's 62.4% and 60.9% respectively, both of which are his lowest %s in a championship season since '05 (though 62.9% and 60.9% in '13 come close). Would you still pick '04/'06 Fed or '15 Novak as a sure bet against that Muster having the run of his life, when Fed couldn't even take a set off Guga and was battling Nalby hard before the Argie's retirement, or given how tentative Djoker was in the '15 final? I wouldn't.
Moving on to Wimbledon. FYI we really don't need to think twice about Dre's form here, cuz
his 35% and 62% in 1st- and 2nd-serve points won for the tourney vs. the likes of Wheaton and Becker, and the eye test of anyone who saw him return seemingly every other serve for a winner during the fortnight, almost certainly constitute the best RoS performance by anyone at SW19 since '91. And it took an inspired Becker to survive that SF as he was getting seriously outmatched early thx to Dre's red-hot return. Oh yeah, and you've got Pistol waiting in the final where he committed zero UFEs apart from his 7 DFs. Even if you insist on swapping Fed or Novak with Pete (which TBF would be a fairer hypothetical) you still have to deal with
Goran in the SF who was literally unbreakable in the 2nd and 4th sets. Simply put this wouldn't be a walk in the park for Novak or even Fed.
And of course there's the famous USO showdown. Yes, Dre could and should have played better, but no, he ain't beating that Pistol no matter what. If there was one preordained outcome in tennis this was it. And if you again make the swap with Pete instead you still have Courier and Dre in the last two rounds. Quite doable for peak Fed/Novak, yes, but not easy.
The indoor season is moot due to Dre's season-ending chest injury (and mental fallout from the loss to Pete), but considering his hot streak it's quite possible he improves on his GW% with better luck even on indoor carpet. And regardless of Dre's performance Fed or Novak would be facing Becker in his imperious form at the YEC. If you think
that match would be another gimme you badly need a crash course in Indoor Tennis 101.
That's the level and variety of competition you're looking at in '95. FWIW I actually think peak Fed or Novak still has a good chance of going 3/4 that year, if more so for Fed (I'm thinking Nole may not survive that SF vs. Goran, given how much he struggled against Anderson in the 4th round in '15). But I can also say this: substitute '95 Dre for '04/'06 Fed or '15 Novak and he wins at least 2 majors, if not 3 (Stanimal would likely be too much for him at RG). In other words, '95 > '04, '06 or '15. And yes, I'm right and you're wrong.