Prince Official - Racquets

[tsamo]

I need a bit of an advice. Never played with a Prince racket before and thought I'll try one. But which one?
I'm between three right now, the Phantom 100p, the Phantom 100x 305 and the Phantom 97p.
Can anyone summarize their differences/strengths?
I've read plenty of reviews, from sites and users both but instead of deciding I'm more confused than ever...
Currently playing with a Vcore 95 weighing 365 grams and strung with Yonex Poly Tour Pro at 23kgs.

 

[jbdbackfan]

I need a bit of an advice. Never played with a Prince racket before and thought I'll try one. But which one?
I'm between three right now, the Phantom 100p, the Phantom 100x 305 and the Phantom 97p.
Can anyone summarize their differences/strengths?
I've read plenty of reviews, from sites and users both but instead of deciding I'm more confused than ever...
Currently playing with a Vcore 95 weighing 365 grams and strung with Yonex Poly Tour Pro at 23kgs.

I own/demoed all three.
The 100p is the most stable of the bunch due to box beam structure and high swingweight. It’s not overly difficult to maneuver but not as whippy as the 97p or 100X. The 100P if you’re not bringing your best shot and technique will make you pay with weaker ball and drop off in power, plus I’ve found over long singles match it can become more cumbersome to hit.
The 100X in my opinion needs about 5-6 grams at 10 and 2 to increase some plow and stability but still remains fairly maneuverable. It serves well and also has better power than its replacement the Phantom pro 100.
The 97p in my opinion is in between both, however with how well the 100p handles it seems at least from some of these boards the 97p hasn’t been as popular as the others. I felt the sweet spot was maybe a little small, however it’s fairly stable and maneuverable as well.
I’d say all are great baseliner racquets but the 100p is most solid on good form and effort whereas the 100x is probably more user friendly and with some modifications can play close to 100p.

 

[AA7]

Home - Fabio Ferro

Tennis Padel

tennistaste.com

 

[agab]

Don't think twice, I looked at the clearance, read the reviews and pulled the trigger on a pair of Beast 98s. Didn't think I'd ever be able to replace my trusty PT280s after a few unsuccessful attempts but I'm really digging all the extra spin potential, easy power and easy effective serving. I didn't think I'd ever find a stick as good around the net either but this is it. A half an ounce makes a big difference in maneuverability as it turns out. Did I mention Textreme with Twaron?

Same here. I pulled the trigger as well.

 

[AMGF]

Pulled the trigger on the Beast Pro 100LB!!

Just out of the court where I tested the Bisner against my VC98+. My VC98+ have leather grips and lead at 4 and 8. The Bisner is stock.

The Beast is easy to swing. I don't get the reviews that says it is hard to swing. But it's in the ballpark of both my leaded VC98+ and my DR98+ that I had before so maybe I'm just used to that weight/swingweight of ~340g and ~340sw. But the Beast is more head light and ultimately hides its weight and sw pretty well. As long as you're used to 12oz+ and 340sw you're in he clear in my opinion.

The main differences for me were the launch angle, TW, and power on the BH side.
The launch angle is higher. I used the same strings as in my VCs and I strung 2lbs higher in the Beast to compensate for the larger head. Even then, the launch angle is higher. But it allowed me to hit effortless deep spinny fh that would hit the fence halfway up. Rallying is easy and effective.

The twistweight is higher as well. Even compared to my leaded VC+. What it lacks in outright precision it gains with its capacity to change the direction of the ball and go for short angles. The sweetspot feels bigger and the racquet is more stable. The general feel is softer than the Vcore even though the RA and vibration frequency is higher. Might be the kevlar or the higher recoil weight but the Bisner does feel a bit more comfortable.

The power is higher on the bisner for similar static specs. Might be the higher ra helping here but it is definitely noticeable, especially on the backhand side. I've never hit such great backhands in my life I believe! Solid, powerful loads of spins this is maybe the biggest plus so far and the fact it's the first time ever with this frame bodes very well. However my slices were not as good, might be the frame, might be the lack off time with it, but the VC feels like its slices are nastier for sure.

Which brings me to the other VC98+ pluses' in its favor in my opinion. The feel is a bit better and you can drop shot and just place the ball a bit better. The Bisner feels a bit out of touch like there is a small delay between the hit and the sensation, the Yonex has an immediate response. Also ultimately I believe the Yonex has a touch more spin, at least according to my hitting partner. Maybe it's me that felt more comfortable going full swing as it's been my frame for the last two years, idk.

The last test for me will be the serve. I haven't had the chance to try it in the time I had, but this will be the deciding factor. If I serve better with the Bisner, that's it, I'm switching. I never thought I'd say that as I really love my VC98+. That Beast is a really great frame, it was very fun to hit with it, I wonder why it had so little attention?

 

[tata]

May I recommend a little lead at 10 and 2 - really firms up the stringbed.

I had to go the other direction. My beast 98 came in around 5.5 pts headlight which is a little under. It was 2g under the unstrung weight so 3g at the bottom of the butt cap brought it closer to target specs. Now it's 321g strung close to 6.5 pt headlight and I finally have something in my hand that reminded me of my classic response 97. It's been something I have been trying to replace since I gave it up as the 12oz weight was getting a bit too much for me.

Since I gave up the PCR97 I played the textreme warrior 100, phantom pro 100p and o3 beast 98. While I did settle on the o3 beast 98 as it really offered me better results overall compared to the other racquets, I never felt like I could play and hit it the same way as the PCR97. Now I I think I can, but my footwork is not as great as it was when I was using the PCR97. If I can sharpen my footwork I'm sure I'll be using the beast 98 full time but for now the o3 version remains to be my old faithful. But if I'm in the zone for aggressive and precise shot making winners, I'm going to pull out the beast 98. It just hits through the court a bit better, except the BH slices where the o3 version just bites the ball better and holds it on the strings longer.

 

[tata]

I found myself hitting the TW Buy Now button last nite for a Beast 98 for 89.00. Do I need one alongside the current 63 rackets on the wall, maybe not, but anecdotal reviews "forced my hand."

Don't be afraid to tinker with a few grams of weight to fine tune it. It was a make or break thing for me.

 

[1stVolley]

I need a bit of an advice. Never played with a Prince racket before and thought I'll try one. But which one?
I'm between three right now, the Phantom 100p, the Phantom 100x 305 and the Phantom 97p.
Can anyone summarize their differences/strengths?
I've read plenty of reviews, from sites and users both but instead of deciding I'm more confused than ever...
Currently playing with a Vcore 95 weighing 365 grams and strung with Yonex Poly Tour Pro at 23kgs.

Have you considered the Textreme Tour 100 (310)? Got great TW playtester reviews. It is a superbly balanced racquet with good power, good control, feel neither too crisp or too muted, not too light and very maneuverable. Well, you get the idea,

 

[graycrait]

@tata , If you want precision in shot making and you are up to it suggest you find a Volkl Tour 10 Mid 1st gen 93" 18x20. I have quite a few 93-95 18x20s but that Volkl is top of the pile.

 

[tata]

@tata , If you want precision in shot making and you are up to it suggest you find a Volkl Tour 10 Mid 1st gen 93" 18x20. I have quite a few 93-95 18x20s but that Volkl is top of the pile.

I've ditched mids for good. These days I'm looking for a compromise between forgiveness and precision. Prior to the pcr97 was the Diablo mid - and I played my best tennis ever using that frame. Can't see going denser with 2 more mains unless strung low. Thought of flirting with the 93p but decided nah the weight class is out of my wheelhouse now. I am now exploring the net and finesse shots to give myself more options for days where I'm just missing the lines a bit off the ground. I am quite liking both beast 98s versions at the net. They feel completely different but the results still deliver.

 

[TW Staff]

With the current global situation, the Prince Tennis Official account is currently on hold for the time being and will not be answering any questions. Hoping to have it back up and running soon!

TW Staff

 

[tsamo]

I own/demoed all three.
The 100p is the most stable of the bunch due to box beam structure and high swingweight. It’s not overly difficult to maneuver but not as whippy as the 97p or 100X. The 100P if you’re not bringing your best shot and technique will make you pay with weaker ball and drop off in power, plus I’ve found over long singles match it can become more cumbersome to hit.
The 100X in my opinion needs about 5-6 grams at 10 and 2 to increase some plow and stability but still remains fairly maneuverable. It serves well and also has better power than its replacement the Phantom pro 100.
The 97p in my opinion is in between both, however with how well the 100p handles it seems at least from some of these boards the 97p hasn’t been as popular as the others. I felt the sweet spot was maybe a little small, however it’s fairly stable and maneuverable as well.
I’d say all are great baseliner racquets but the 100p is most solid on good form and effort whereas the 100x is probably more user friendly and with some modifications can play close to 100p.

Have you considered the Textreme Tour 100 (310)? Got great TW playtester reviews. It is a superbly balanced racquet with good power, good control, feel neither too crisp or too muted, not too light and very maneuverable. Well, you get the idea,

Thanks for your responses. Currently all my rackets are on the more "advanced" side so the 100x being more user friendly for when I'm not at my best sounded appealing.
Unfortunately TWE does not carry them at this time but I was lucky to find a last one in a tennis store I frequent(and it was my grip size too!) for dirt cheap, like 115€ brand new!!
So I pulled the trigger and now I'm waiting... Really looking forward to hitting with this one.

 

[DJTaurus]

Thanks for your responses. Currently all my rackets are on the more "advanced" side so the 100x being more user friendly for when I'm not at my best sounded appealing.
Unfortunately TWE does not carry them at this time but I was lucky to find a last one in a tennis store I frequent(and it was my grip size too!) for dirt cheap, like 115€ brand new!!
So I pulled the trigger and now I'm waiting... Really looking forward to hitting with this one.

Which store ?

 

[PT280 Fan]

I had to go the other direction. My beast 98 came in around 5.5 pts headlight which is a little under. It was 2g under the unstrung weight so 3g at the bottom of the butt cap brought it closer to target specs.

Yeah, I was mainly referring to the cure for off-center hit jarring. One of the great things about this frame in comparison to the PT280 is the added width and stiffness at the tip which generates more free power. But before the mod I did get a wonky feel on a couple balls hit way off center.

 

[eb_tennis_247]

I wish Prince Officials would show up ... this image is bad for my favorite (struggling) brand ...

 

[PT280 Fan]

Pulled the trigger on the Beast Pro 100LB!!

Just out of the court where I tested the Bisner against my VC98+. My VC98+ have leather grips and lead at 4 and 8. The Bisner is stock.

The Beast is easy to swing. I don't get the reviews that says it is hard to swing. But it's in the ballpark of both my leaded VC98+ and my DR98+ that I had before so maybe I'm just used to that weight/swingweight of ~340g and ~340sw. But the Beast is more head light and ultimately hides its weight and sw pretty well. As long as you're used to 12oz+ and 340sw you're in he clear in my opinion.

The main differences for me were the launch angle, TW, and power on the BH side.
The launch angle is higher. I used the same strings as in my VCs and I strung 2lbs higher in the Beast to compensate for the larger head. Even then, the launch angle is higher. But it allowed me to hit effortless deep spinny fh that would hit the fence halfway up. Rallying is easy and effective.

The twistweight is higher as well. Even compared to my leaded VC+. What it lacks in outright precision it gains with its capacity to change the direction of the ball and go for short angles. The sweetspot feels bigger and the racquet is more stable. The general feel is softer than the Vcore even though the RA and vibration frequency is higher. Might be the kevlar or the higher recoil weight but the Bisner does feel a bit more comfortable.

The power is higher on the bisner for similar static specs. Might be the higher ra helping here but it is definitely noticeable, especially on the backhand side. I've never hit such great backhands in my life I believe! Solid, powerful loads of spins this is maybe the biggest plus so far and the fact it's the first time ever with this frame bodes very well. However my slices were not as good, might be the frame, might be the lack off time with it, but the VC feels like its slices are nastier for sure.

Which brings me to the other VC98+ pluses' in its favor in my opinion. The feel is a bit better and you can drop shot and just place the ball a bit better. The Bisner feels a bit out of touch like there is a small delay between the hit and the sensation, the Yonex has an immediate response. Also ultimately I believe the Yonex has a touch more spin, at least according to my hitting partner. Maybe it's me that felt more comfortable going full swing as it's been my frame for the last two years, idk.

The last test for me will be the serve. I haven't had the chance to try it in the time I had, but this will be the deciding factor. If I serve better with the Bisner, that's it, I'm switching. I never thought I'd say that as I really love my VC98+. That Beast is a really great frame, it was very fun to hit with it, I wonder why it had so little attention?

Nice review. Made me look as I thought Isner was still playing the Warrior. Pretty cool with the clearance that you can get an actual Pro Player frame at that price point. I heard he's actually playing them off the shelf.

 

[AMGF]

Pulled the trigger on the Beast Pro 100LB!!

Just out of the court where I tested the Bisner against my VC98+. My VC98+ have leather grips and lead at 4 and 8. The Bisner is stock.

The Beast is easy to swing. I don't get the reviews that says it is hard to swing. But it's in the ballpark of both my leaded VC98+ and my DR98+ that I had before so maybe I'm just used to that weight/swingweight of ~340g and ~340sw. But the Beast is more head light and ultimately hides its weight and sw pretty well. As long as you're used to 12oz+ and 340sw you're in he clear in my opinion.

The main differences for me were the launch angle, TW, and power on the BH side.
The launch angle is higher. I used the same strings as in my VCs and I strung 2lbs higher in the Beast to compensate for the larger head. Even then, the launch angle is higher. But it allowed me to hit effortless deep spinny fh that would hit the fence halfway up. Rallying is easy and effective.

The twistweight is higher as well. Even compared to my leaded VC+. What it lacks in outright precision it gains with its capacity to change the direction of the ball and go for short angles. The sweetspot feels bigger and the racquet is more stable. The general feel is softer than the Vcore even though the RA and vibration frequency is higher. Might be the kevlar or the higher recoil weight but the Bisner does feel a bit more comfortable.

The power is higher on the bisner for similar static specs. Might be the higher ra helping here but it is definitely noticeable, especially on the backhand side. I've never hit such great backhands in my life I believe! Solid, powerful loads of spins this is maybe the biggest plus so far and the fact it's the first time ever with this frame bodes very well. However my slices were not as good, might be the frame, might be the lack off time with it, but the VC feels like its slices are nastier for sure.

Which brings me to the other VC98+ pluses' in its favor in my opinion. The feel is a bit better and you can drop shot and just place the ball a bit better. The Bisner feels a bit out of touch like there is a small delay between the hit and the sensation, the Yonex has an immediate response. Also ultimately I believe the Yonex has a touch more spin, at least according to my hitting partner. Maybe it's me that felt more comfortable going full swing as it's been my frame for the last two years, idk.

The last test for me will be the serve. I haven't had the chance to try it in the time I had, but this will be the deciding factor. If I serve better with the Bisner, that's it, I'm switching. I never thought I'd say that as I really love my VC98+. That Beast is a really great frame, it was very fun to hit with it, I wonder why it had so little attention?

I'll finally stick to my VC98+. The main reason is that for all the power I can't really swing as freely with the Bisner mainly because of the launch angle, I could probably make it work by working with strings and tensions but this is a long process and I don't want to do it. The serves were great, but only marginally better so I'm sticking to my Yonex. The volleys were awesome though. I might make it my doubles frame...

 

[ccmtennis]

For those of you Beast 98 fans... I got a japanese version of it today from another TW user and here it is. Interested to know if anyone has tried it side by side with the US version. Seems to have slight differences like wt of 305 g and power level of 900 vs 925 , so I can't wait to try it

 

[PT280 Fan]

That's some crazy **** CCM. Hope you like it. Gotta say I'm lovin my recently acquired non-ported Beast 98s more with each day on court.

 

[PBODY99]

@ccmtennis

The O3104 has the same specs in both markets. My Japanese frame has red string channel trim

 

[Deleted member 762754]

Can prince get rid of power levels? It's kinda stupid imo

 

[tata]

Can prince get rid of power levels? It's kinda stupid imo

It helps when comparing other Prince racquets. But yes, not much use when compared to other racquets from other brands.

 

[ericykchan]

Finally played with the Phantom Graphite 107, strung with V-Square 19G at 48lb. My current racket is Ezone 100 (2020). PG107 with that string basically removed any vibration (or feel). It is the most comfortable racket I have played. Compare with EZ100, PG107 is more powerful, feel more head light. Groundstrokes is good with lots of spin. Serve is definitely worse. I have to say I have not dialed in with PG107 yet. If anyone wants a comfortable racket this probably one of the top (disclaimer: I have never play any ProKennex rackets).

 

[Searah]

anyone try the prince X? the twist technology.

 

[Fedinkum]

For those of you Beast 98 fans... I got a japanese version of it today from another TW user and here it is. Interested to know if anyone has tried it side by side with the US version. Seems to have slight differences like wt of 305 g and power level of 900 vs 925 , so I can't wait to try it

The O-Port was a real inventive tennis tech. I give credit to Prince for really trying something new back then. Some people hated it, but I loved my Tour 98 and Tour 100.

 

[anarosevoli]

Can prince get rid of power levels? It's kinda stupid imo

Yes no need for those who know about racquets and the others don't even understand it. But they seem to get rid of names instead, on the new Phantom you really have to search for the word "Phantom", in the pictures I only found it very tiny on 3 and 9. No need to hide the joint best name for a racquet (together with Blade).

 

[Deleted member 762754]

Here are my Tour Pro 98s. Really underrated sticks imo

https://imgur.com/a/Biwoyns

 

[realplayer]

Nice rackets

 

[ericykchan]

anyone try the prince X? the twist technology.

There is a thread on this. I own the X100 Tour, it is good and backhand did seem to give a little bit of more power. Other than that, it's nothing special (but does look so cool). It seems to be quite string sensitive too.

 

[GreenClay]

The O-Port was a real inventive tennis tech. I give credit to Prince for really trying something new back then. Some people hated it, but I loved my Tour 98 and Tour 100.

Love the O3 technology. Really opens up the sweetspot. Still can’t find a racket better than the old (2014) Tour 18/20 O3.

 

[ccmtennis]

Just got back from my first hitting session with Japanese version of the Beast 98 and it was very interesting so I'll post some of my thoughts. First of it is definitely not just a Beast with an extra 5 g and the change in HL balance from 12.4 to the standard 12.79 is noticeable in higher SW at least 330 or 332. Still felt maneuverable due to the ports though. My background is a 4.5 player mostly dubs with a OHBH and use the standard beast 98 03 with just 2 grams at 3' and 9'. I also have the TXT tour 310 with the added 1g at 12' in the recent pass. The current stick weighs in at 11.67 with an overgrip and dampner and no added weights whereas my standard US versions come in a 11.41 with the weights, OG and dampner. One interesting cosmetic that changes the playing experience is also the paint job. If u notice it is matted in the throat and glossy in the hoop. As someone with a OHBH that likes to prep with the racket upright ala wawrinka style, I like holding the glossy part better as it has more grip than the matted US version.

Comparison to the standard beast is striking. It produces a much heavier ball and plows through it well. Serves were the bomb compared to the standard beast both in power and spin and was frustrating my regular hitting partner in singles today. Same thing with slices, the HL balance and weight makes this shot a weapon on a chip and charge that I like to do lot. With regards to the TXT 310 it feels similar but with much more maneuverability and a noticeable lower launch angle (likely due to the string pattern and spacing) . My hitting partner had the newest Pure strike 98 and to both our surprise the plow and launch angle felt very similar, i.e it feels like a slightly heavier 3rd gen Pure strike 98 with ports! go figure haha.

Ultimately I will need to test this in a competitive dubs match to be sure what to do since that is my bread and butter. I am a lil concern that it is not as maneuverable at the net with fast exchanges which is current a strength of my game and that will be a deal breaker. Maybe it will still be a better singles stick. Either that or I could get fitter and stronger... but who wants to do that right? lol

 

[Bucko]

Hey guys,

I'm currently using the 2019 Textreme Tour 100 (305) and love it, but occasionally the tennis elbow plays up. I tried the Phantom 100 and the elbow loved it, but I got pushed around by the big hitters and it lacked power - especially on serve.

Is anything in the new Phantom range as powerful and stable as my Tour 100?

Thanks in advance

 

[jbdbackfan]

Hey guys,

I'm currently using the 2019 Textreme Tour 100 (305) and love it, but occasionally the tennis elbow plays up. I tried the Phantom 100 and the elbow loved it, but I got pushed around by the big hitters and it lacked power - especially on serve.

Is anything in the new Phantom range as powerful and stable as my Tour 100?

Thanks in advance

Try the 100x or if you can handle the weight the 100P. Both solid choices.

 

[tata]

Hey guys,

I'm currently using the 2019 Textreme Tour 100 (305) and love it, but occasionally the tennis elbow plays up. I tried the Phantom 100 and the elbow loved it, but I got pushed around by the big hitters and it lacked power - especially on serve.

Is anything in the new Phantom range as powerful and stable as my Tour 100?

Thanks in advance

A few grams of weight at 10 and 2 or at 12 can solve the power and stability issue on the phantom 100. Don't give it up just yet. Otherwise the phantom range might still treat your elbow nicely. The 305x seems popular.

 

[Bucko]

A few grams of weight at 10 and 2 or at 12 can solve the power and stability issue on the phantom 100. Don't give it up just yet. Otherwise the phantom range might still treat your elbow nicely. The 305x seems popular.

I tried to weight the Phantom 100 but the Tour 100 is just an all round better racquet. Serving with that Phantom was diabolical

 

[Bucko]

Try the 100x or if you can handle the weight the 100P. Both solid choices.

Thank you. How do they compare in power and stability to the Tour 100 (305)?

 

[agab]

I just bought two Phantom 100 rackets. My previous racket was Ezone DR 98 which is awesome racket as well. I have hit 4 times with the Phantom 100 and I am really happy with it. My ground strokes were about the same as my Yonex. Serve and Slice were definitely much better. I guess it has to do with how freely I can swing the phantom rackets. Volley were unbelievably good. Hopefully this switch will help heal up my elbow.
Never owner a Prince racket before. So excited to make this switch.

 

[jbdbackfan]

Thank you. How do they compare in power and stability to the Tour 100 (305)?

The 100P Will be the most powerful and stable on full strokes due to its swingweight. I’d say the 100X has less power than the tour 100 but a similar stability. I’ve added some weight at 10 and 2 on the 100x to add some stability and plow.

 

[DJTaurus]

The 100P Will be the most powerful and stable on full strokes due to its swingweight. I’d say the 100X has less power than the tour 100 but a similar stability. I’ve added some weight at 10 and 2 on the 100x to add some stability and plow.

Give us your review on 100X.

 

[ccmtennis]

Thank you. How do they compare in power and stability to the Tour 100 (305)?

I agree with the comments above about the 100P. As a former TXT 310 user, I found the 100X even with 2 grams of weight at 10 and 2 to be disappointing. I love the TW reviews and they are usually spot on for me but this one (100 X review) missed the mark completely for me. It was odd since Erik was a TXT 310 user as well. For me only the 100 P was a worth comparison to the TXT 310 and its higher swing weight is manageable given its thin beam and maneuverability

 

[lefty10spro]

Hey guys,

I'm currently using the 2019 Textreme Tour 100 (305) and love it, but occasionally the tennis elbow plays up. I tried the Phantom 100 and the elbow loved it, but I got pushed around by the big hitters and it lacked power - especially on serve.

Is anything in the new Phantom range as powerful and stable as my Tour 100?

Thanks in advance

No. All the Phantoms have this problem. You must be a beast to produce a heavy ball. Amazing softness however. The Textreme Tour 100P (2015) is the racket for you, but they are gone. Maybe you can find one used. The new sticks with Twaron are stiffer and get to my elbow as well. Keep your tension down for elbow relief. I string my TT100 310 at 40# with Diablo Pro 16L. For you fans of the old Tour XC - the new name is Diablo Pro!! Same stuff.

 

[DJTaurus]

No. All the Phantoms have this problem. You must be a beast to produce a heavy ball. Amazing softness however. The Textreme Tour 100P (2015) is the racket for you, but they are gone. Maybe you can find one used. The new sticks with Twaron are stiffer and get to my elbow as well. Keep your tension down for elbow relief. I string my TT100 310 at 40# with Diablo Pro 16L. For you fans of the old Tour XC - the new name is Diablo Pro!! Same stuff.

Can you compare the feel of tour 100P to a phantom for example like 100X ?

 

[lefty10spro]

Can you compare the feel of tour 100P to a phantom for example like 100X ?

The TT100P (2019) is a 66 stiffness rating compared to the 62 of the 2015 version. All the Phantoms are in the 50s. No comparison really. If you want a challenging but easy on the arm frame that often requires lead tape placement to negate the fluttering of flexy frames, go with Phantom. The Tour line is much easier to use with more free pop and MUCH more stability.

 

[bleno567]

https://imgur.com/a/Biwoyns

Ah yes. The savage banana.

 

[jbdbackfan]

I agree with the comments above about the 100P. As a former TXT 310 user, I found the 100X even with 2 grams of weight at 10 and 2 to be disappointing. I love the TW reviews and they are usually spot on for me but this one (100 X review) missed the mark completely for me. It was odd since Erik was a TXT 310 user as well. For me only the 100 P was a worth comparison to the TXT 310 and its higher swing weight is manageable given its thin beam and maneuverability

I’m finding same issue. I just add weight and the feel isn’t like my graphite 100s or even the Phantom Pro 100. Not sure what it is but the feel is just bizarre to me even with my normal weight and string set up. I think I like the graphite’s the most cause you get similar starting swing weight but it’s 0.3 oz heavier to start.

 

[jbdbackfan]

Can you compare the feel of tour 100P to a phantom for example like 100X ?

The tour 100p is more “modern” and maybe forgiving, but the 100p is more plush and requires more form to get good ball. Both are great racquets it’s just one needs to realize what they can handle. The phantom 100p can be a lot of racquet.

 

[jbdbackfan]

I agree with the comments above about the 100P. As a former TXT 310 user, I found the 100X even with 2 grams of weight at 10 and 2 to be disappointing. I love the TW reviews and they are usually spot on for me but this one (100 X review) missed the mark completely for me. It was odd since Erik was a TXT 310 user as well. For me only the 100 P was a worth comparison to the TXT 310 and its higher swing weight is manageable given its thin beam and maneuverability

Not to mention he’s playing it stock supposedly with a sw around 325.

 

[Cobaine]

Hey guys,

I'm currently using the 2019 Textreme Tour 100 (305) and love it, but occasionally the tennis elbow plays up. I tried the Phantom 100 and the elbow loved it, but I got pushed around by the big hitters and it lacked power - especially on serve.

Is anything in the new Phantom range as powerful and stable as my Tour 100?

Thanks in advance

Just add weight. I use a 100x 305 that I weighted up to 12 oz and has plenty of power, especially if you don’t string it too tight.

 

[jbdbackfan]

Anyone here know the strung weight of the new Phantom graphite 100s scheduled to come out?

 

[eb_tennis_247]

Btw - I see that many popular online (Express, ******* Tennis, etc.) and specialty stores do not carry Prince racquets at all any more.

Is that a recent negative trend?
Why not carry a Prince? Is it a matter of low demand? Prince racquets are still in top 10 to top 15.