SeeingDusk
Hall of Fame
Konta looking strong this tournament. Hitting big and hard.
I'm all for "wait and see" when it comes to new players and I also acknowledge that anyone can beat anyone on any given day, but she showed pretty consistent and high level since she came back from injury in Toronto. Martens, Vekic and especially Bencic could pose a challenge - absolutely, but being as confident as she is at the moment after winning so many matches, including against top players in big matches, I would give her the first chance over the others.
Besides, the tennis she's playing at the moment is very solid and combined with other factors, it's a winning formula.
Now, I will refrain from proclaiming just yet that she is the "next big thing" (even if she wins the USO), multiple GS winner, future #1, etc..... all the BS you often hear over and over when a new, young player has a good run. I would definitely like to see her succeed and see all that materialize in the long run, but I would definitely wait and see where she'll be at at the end of the next season and how she handles all this new found success. Will she be able to filter out all the noise that comes with this level of success and remain grounded and focused on her tennis career? Will she be able to sustain this level with some consistency and continue to progress? Will she be able to defend her points next year? Will she still be top 10 by end of next season with more title wins?
These are questions that only time will answer.....
Can’t see Konta having any chance whatsoever.
She looks so strong. Can definitely upset today.
Nope. Makes entirely too many errors. She would have to serve lights out
here for Jo beating Svitolina in straights
edit: i see she is down a break already
I'm all for "wait and see" when it comes to new players and I also acknowledge that anyone can beat anyone on any given day, but she showed pretty consistent and high level since she came back from injury in Toronto. Martens, Vekic and especially Bencic could pose a challenge - absolutely, but being as confident as she is at the moment after winning so many matches, including against top players in big matches, I would give her the first chance over the others.
Besides, the tennis she's playing at the moment is very solid and combined with other factors, it's a winning formula.
Now, I will refrain from proclaiming just yet that she is the "next big thing" (even if she wins the USO), multiple GS winner, future #1, etc..... all the BS you often hear over and over when a new, young player has a good run. I would definitely like to see her succeed and see all that materialize in the long run, but I would definitely wait and see where she'll be at at the end of the next season and how she handles all this new found success. Will she be able to filter out all the noise that comes with this level of success and remain grounded and focused on her tennis career? Will she be able to sustain this level with some consistency and continue to progress? Will she be able to defend her points next year? Will she still be top 10 by end of next season with more title wins?
These are questions that only time will answer.....
Its all so revealing: you have many going overboard by the minute about Andreescu as if she's on the road to winning the Grand Slam, yet some of the same Andreescu-obsessed have trashed Osaka as if she has no game / or is washed up, when she made of the biggest true majors splashes in recent history by winning her first, then the next major. She's been called "mediocre" and accused of having "no game" yet she is the holder of back-to-back-majors. Meanwhile, for reasons having little to do with tennis, Andreescu is constantly inflated as a player.
Again, revealing.
I usually don't like to meddle in these issues, but this is BS. People are propping Andreescu up, because she has been outstanding on hardcourts this year. Since March, excluding her retirement in Miami, she has won every single hardcourt tournament she has played. She has a 40-4 (or something like that) record this year, 14 consecutive wins. That's more than enough to make people believe she may go all the way and win the USO. I agree that some people may have gone overboard telling there's just no way she loses in hardcourts, but what she has achieved up until this point is, in fact, impressive.
Also, I remember Osaka being equally propped up during the AO this year, but many people were also dumbfounded by the sudden dismissal of her coach and by her struggles since then, when she started to seem resolved and steady. Yes, she was harshly criticised sometimes (for ugly, racist reasons at times, no doubt about that), but she was also hyped to the high heavens before. It's just that Andreescu looks even more impressive than pre-'18 Osaka. Not everything has to be about race.
Jo Konta created Very great drop-shot and confirmed her BP.
Who ever mentioned anything about race lol? It’s tennis.
svitolina is also pretty basic player
Not me, certainly. But TV uses that argument a lot, sometimes without any justification.
The Ronaldo's ketchup analogy works like a charm with Svitolina too. The first SF is the hardest; after that, they just keep on coming.
Konta's UFE were her undoing again.
The crowd is so silent. I feel for Svitolina.
Sometimes people are not upfront about it either but you can see it related to that.
Its all so revealing: you have many going overboard by the minute about Andreescu as if she's on the road to winning the Grand Slam, yet some of the same Andreescu-obsessed have trashed Osaka as if she has no game / or is washed up, when she made of the biggest true majors splashes in recent history by winning her first, then the next major. She's been called "mediocre" and accused of having "no game" yet she is the holder of back-to-back-majors. Meanwhile, for reasons having little to do with tennis, Andreescu is constantly inflated as a player.
Again, revealing.
Back to back Slam semifinals after not reaching that stage before in her career. Keep improving Eli.
It's Serena's title to lose. But should she have a bad day, I think Eli is as likely as anyone else left in the draw to capitalise.
Hopefully that happens and she does...
Back to back Slam semifinals after not reaching that stage before in her career. Keep improving Eli.
It's Serena's title to lose. But should she have a bad day, I think Eli is as likely as anyone else left in the draw to capitalise.
Hopefully that happens and she does...
Can they ban post-match interviews please?
I disagree there. I think it’s Bianca’s title to lose.
The post match interview is for free public relations for the victor ans indirectly their sponsors too! It try to get the human side of the player.Can they ban post-match interviews please?
Not me, certainly. But TV uses that argument a lot, sometimes without any justification.
Nope. The evidence is this board, and the way Osaka has been blasted--a back-to-back new majors winner compared to the slobbering idolatry over Andreescu when the later has yet to prove anything at a major. This is about actual ability and achievements, yet Osaka--the breakout majors winner in all of tennis for the past several years--has been repeatedly criticized.
Serena would really need to play first-strike tennis against Svitolina. But, "smart" first-strike. Serve big and go for a bigger second serve than normal (like Medvedev against Djoker in Cincy); really look to move forward at any reasonable opportunity (but she doesn't move forward that well). Has to get herself the right balls so that going for the put away shot is the right play. Easier said than done. She should return aggressively but not go for broke on every first serve as she likes to do. And, as I said yesterday, if she's getting pulled wide on the run, she's got to slow things down; throw up a high ball, hit a defensive slice rather than trying to hit big every time because (1) she tends to pull up her shoulder and make an error when trying to go big on the forehand when stretched, and (2) even if she gets it back hard, unless she hits a pure winner or draws an error, the ball will only get back to her side of the court faster and she doesn't have the footspeed to get to the NEXT ball if her returns her hard ball to the other side of the court.