Tim Henman: Djokovic Is Not The Most Complete Player Ever

NoleFam

Bionic Poster
But that was the context of the Sampras quote. He was telling everyone that he would beat Nadal and he would do it by coming in to the net, which Federer was not doing. That would not have worked on the slow courts. Did you even bother to look it up? Of course not, you joined 8 months ago and post 1,000 times so carry on mashing on your keyboard while I go play some actual tennis.

Is this the rhetoric you spew everytime you lose an argument? Yea I joined last year but clearly have been following tennis for a really long time. That wasn't the context of my comment. I said Sampras could come in on his second serve and he could. The slower courts really wouldn't make much difference when you are serving second serves at 113 and 118 mph on the line and the opponent has no idea what direction you are going. How successful he would be is subjective but let's not act like Nadal's return is on the level of Agassi.
 
Last edited:

Aretium

Hall of Fame
Keyboard warrior at his/her finest....unless you are Henman perhaps?

I don't care. I wouldn't fight you in real life. Just to let you know that your comment is atrocious and you should start analysing the world critically and yourself.
 

gambitt

Banned
Is this the rhetoric you spew everytime you lose an argument? Yea I joined last year but clearly have been following tennis for a really long time. That wasn't the context of my comment. I said Sampras could come in on his second serve and he could. The slower courts really wouldn't make much difference when you are serving second serves at 113 and 118 mph on the line and the opponent has no idea what direction you are going. How successful he would be is subjective but let's not act like Nadal's return is on the level of Agassi.

It's what a spew when I'm being bored to death. Just got home from a rewarding hit under the floodlights. How was the internet while I was gone?
 

Gazelle

G.O.A.T.
There's no way that Djokovic is more complete than Federer. Both are incomplete btw, have holes in their game.
 

Diehard

Semi-Pro
I don't care. I wouldn't fight you in real life. Just to let you know that your comment is atrocious and you should start analysing the world critically and yourself.
Not asking you for a fight but Henman was a coward, and he lost lots of resect in this country, it did not go down well with the davis Cup team.
 

nolefam_2024

G.O.A.T.
Henman is exactly right but Novak has worked on adding variety in his A game. His A game is already good enough to beat anyone on his best day so it doesn't matter. Would like to stop this Novak has most complete game BS though.
 

Fiero425

Legend
He's the only British tennis player I can even think of besides Murray.

And Renshaw and Perry.

They had plenty or British players; just none that elite! I'm sure you heard of Evert's 1st husband, John Lloyd! He had 2 other brothers and they all played for England! The women have traditionally done better; led by Virginia Wade, Sue Barker, Ann Hobbs, and Jo Durie! They've had some good juniors, but never seem to make that next big step to make a major quarter or semi, much less play a final and win! Without Wade, I think they would have been an obscure power, overvaluing their worth to tennis with the Wightman Cup way back when! It was the equivalent to the Hopman or Nations Cup where Britain played 7 matches in singles and doubles against the US every year! Big waste of time; usually a shellacking with Evert, Austin, Shriver, Jaeger, and other "also-rans" of the day! ;-)
 
Last edited:

SublimeTennis

Professional
http://www.**************.org/Tim-H...-Most-Complete-Player-Ever-articolo30179.html

Former World No. 4 Tim Henman says Novak Djokovic is not the most complete player ever but that he is one of the most effective players in the history of the game.

Speaking in New Delhi where he is promoting the Road to Wimbledon programme, Henman said that every aspect of Djokovic's game is very advanced and athletic and that he is very solid from the back of the court but added that he does not come to the net very often.

Hmn, wonder who is right.

Discuss.

How can Djokovic be the most complete player when he is a baseliner? Has no idea how to play the net? I'm getting tired of people thinking the tennis universe is just the last 15 years, how would Djokovic do in the 70's on super fast courts with 65" rackets with gut? Where physicality didn't matter very much? Tennis is more, much more than the last 15 years, if he wants to say the most complete player in the modern slow court era he might have a case, but Henmen knew 90's fast courts, this is why he knows what he's talking about.
 

Sysyphus

Talk Tennis Guru
Oh dear!

I actually read most of this thread. 10/10, would read again.

Djovak fans can be pretty adorable.



Good to see someone involved in the marketing side of the game still be able to come with a sober judgement not clouded by the availability heuristic.

776299-henman9.jpg
 

jga111

Hall of Fame
WImbledon's 'Henman Hill' lost his title to 'Murray Mound' and he is taking out his frustration onto poor Djokovic. Djokovic is as complete as they come, though I haven't seen him do a somersault overhead smash, I believe this is a hole in his game he must address ASAP if he is to have any revered recognition of his completeness.
 
Top