2023 WTA Finals - General Discussion

Who will win the title at the 2023 WTA Finals?


  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .

Mr.Lob

G.O.A.T.
Pegula beats Coco 6-2, 6-breadstick.

Coco needs to re-read the chapter in "Winning Ugly" on how to play in the wind.
 
Last edited:

robyrolfo

Hall of Fame
I can see why they are ranked #1 and #2 this year. Gauff/Vondrosova was one of the worst matches I've ever seen, lol. The quality of play is quite awful this week, but Sabalenka and Swiatek are handling the wind much better than the other players. Have to give it to them (and Pegula).
Not a fan of either, but I think Sabalenka deserves it more overall. She played the Semifinal of all 4 Slams in 2023, Swiatek lost before the Semifinals in Australia, Wimbledon and US Open.
It was super windy at some points, and you could see that they were literally just trying to keep the ball in play. On those occasions, you can't completely fault them.

That said, the overall level was still really poor, even during the periods where the wind wasn't a factor. And yes, Swiatek and Sabalenka have clearly been the best two players this year, but that's not saying much. I mean, do we remember the US Open final? If that is the best women's tennis player in the world, the standard has fallen to an incredibly low level.
I haven't really followed WTA in the last 5-10 years. What's currently happening? Bad courts? Bad payments for everyone outside the Top20? I see a lot of Instagram/Twitter posts from pros complaining.
What's currently happened is that there is no more Serena, and the likes of Graf, Seles, Navratilova, Evert... are long gone. There is nobody currently in the women's game that can elevate the WTA to interest levels even approaching the ATP. And I'm not just talking about skill. Even if the current #1 and #2 where even half as good as the greats (which they are not even close to half), they would still be from Belarus and Poland.

So yeah, the WTA is in a bad spot right now. It might as well not exist for the casual fan, but somehow the players don't seem to understand this. They are friends with Nadal and Djokovic on social media, plus the likes of Messi, Mbappe and Verstappen... and they think those people are their peers. But they are not. They have a few things in common, but when it comes to generating attention and revenue, they are worlds apart.
kostyuk got married this weekend apparently. I guess she figured a while back it was worth the gamble that she wouldn't make Cancun (or last week's one).
Wait, what? How old is she? Oh well, she will be divorced by her early 30's...
 

tennis4me

Hall of Fame
Ended up tuning back only to catch the post-match interview.
Pegula played remarkably well? Or Coco just not playing well or adjusting to court/condition? Anyone? Thanks.
 
Pegula steady in windy conditions. Coco a lot of errors. Frustrated. Body language not great.
Pegula is better at adjusting to balls that don't bounce ideally. That's why she is now 4-0. We'll see if the advantage holds up in the final. Makes me wish for some more inconsistent court surfaces, though. Bringing back the old grass at Wimbledon would be a start. And carpet always had some dead spots, so that'd help, too. Love that many of the WTA prima donnas can't handle the wind or court conditions in this tournament. Looking forward to the final.
 

SeeingDusk

Hall of Fame
This has to be the most disastrous tennis tournament I’ve ever seen. Play a few points and then rain comes. Dry the court. Play a few points. Rain comes again. Rinse and repeat. Not to mention, the wind is horrific.
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
This has to be the most disastrous tennis tournament I’ve ever seen. Play a few points and then rain comes. Dry the court. Play a few points. Rain comes again. Rinse and repeat. Not to mention, the wind is horrific.
Guess you didn't watch much Wimbledon in the 80s/90s, that was the norm a lot of the time. Play a few points or games, then rain etc. I remember Graf's 62, 61 beatdown over Seles in '92 had playing time of 1 hour, but it was played over 8 hours. In 1997 they were still playing first round matches on Saturday. Complete disaster.

And some USO's were like that as well(2003 with it's "misting" rain for like 5 straight days. Stop, start etc)
 

SeeingDusk

Hall of Fame
Guess you didn't watch much Wimbledon in the 80s/90s, that was the norm a lot of the time. Play a few points or games, then rain etc. I remember Graf's 62, 61 beatdown over Seles in '92 had playing time of 1 hour, but it was played over 8 hours. In 1997 they were still playing first round matches on Saturday. Complete disaster.

And some USO's were like that as well(2003 with it's "misting" rain for like 5 straight days. Stop, start etc)

Thanks for informing me. Crazy that there were more disastrous tournaments in history :D
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
So tomorrow they still need to finish the RR match of Gauff/Pegula v Siegemund/Zvonareva to finalise who qualifies for the SF.
They then need to play the SF between Melichah-Martinez/Perez v Dabrowski/Routliffe and then the second semifinal between Hunter/Mertens and the winner of said earlier match. And then the final as well?

And then also finish the singles between Swiatek and Sabalenka and then also the final between Pegula and the winner of the other SF?

Gee, Cancun is so fun.
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
The singles and doubles finals have been re-scheduled for Monday
That's a necessity. If Swiatek and Sabalenka basically had to play a full match against each other and then face Pegula a couple of hours later, whoever won that semi would almost certainly lose to a fresh Pegula.
 
That's a necessity. If Swiatek and Sabalenka basically had to play a full match against each other and then face Pegula a couple of hours later, whoever won that semi would almost certainly lose to a fresh Pegula.
women can play 5 sets!
But agree in fairness it is correct choice to suspend on Monday.

Anyway, they should rethink to only play on indoor now. I think the decision in Cancun is because of how successful Guadalajara was.
 

ScottleeSV

Hall of Fame
Thanks for informing me. Crazy that there were more disastrous tournaments in history :D
That 97 Wimbledon was bonkers. No play Monday, no play Tuesday, an hour or two of play on Wednesday. One Argentine player just flew home because he couldn't be bothered waiting anymore.

By Saturday there was still at least one Rd 1 match left, which just happened to be debuting teenager Venus Williams. She then got beaten in front of a scarce crowd which included a 15 year old Serena (who seemed to be reading a book instead of actually watching).

I'm not sure if that was the year Cliff Richard stood up and sang to a bored centre court crowd, but it ought to have been.
 

ScottleeSV

Hall of Fame
I think the decision in Cancun is because of how successful Guadalajara was.
Was it?

Most of the top 10 couldn't be bothered with it. I seem to remember Swiatek and Sabalenka skipped it last year as well.

I'll die on the inside if that tourny is back next year. I feel pretty safe that Cancun isn't returning.

Mexico is good for a 250 in March but beyond that...I'm not sold. I know the players aren't sold. I'm sure the beach resorts are nice but in terms of playing tennis, nobody wants to go. Even Katie Boulter skipped Guadalajara.
 

arnott

Rookie
Guess you didn't watch much Wimbledon in the 80s/90s, that was the norm a lot of the time. Play a few points or games, then rain etc. I remember Graf's 62, 61 beatdown over Seles in '92 had playing time of 1 hour, but it was played over 8 hours. In 1997 they were still playing first round matches on Saturday. Complete disaster.

And some USO's were like that as well(2003 with it's "misting" rain for like 5 straight days. Stop, start etc)

I have memories of Becker vs Lendl matches played over many days.
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Was it?

Most of the top 10 couldn't be bothered with it. I seem to remember Swiatek and Sabalenka skipped it last year as well.

I'll die on the inside if that tourny is back next year. I feel pretty safe that Cancun isn't returning.

Mexico is good for a 250 in March but beyond that...I'm not sold. I know the players aren't sold. I'm sure the beach resorts are nice but in terms of playing tennis, nobody wants to go. Even Katie Boulter skipped Guadalajara.
crowds were fantastic in Guadalajara this year, and every year it's been played. I mean everyone likes to mock attendance at WTA events, so I think its pretty notable that something like a Dolehide-Trevisan QF is played in front of a packed house. There would be like no one in the stands for that match at the majority of the tour stops. It would even be pretty empty if it was a French Open QF. Sabalenka did play it last year BTW. I think using top players not playing a masters as a way to say it's a failure is a mistake, there have been many Paris Masters with very few top 10 players in the past, you can never guarantee player commitments at any event through a long year. The date on the calendar was obviously a factor with withdrawals this year, it was held too soon after the USO. But yet fans still showed up to watch lesser names. Impressive.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
Apparently Storm Hunter will end the year as the #1 doubles player(after todays results)
Yep, called that one during the RR stage which really surprised me

Hunter/Mertens go 3-0 in their group and qualify for the SF's.

Barring some huge comeback by Gauff/Pegula needing to win their match and other scenarios to go their way.... Storm Hunter will be the new #1 doubles player in the world.

Number 1 in the world with just 2 active titles to her name (Rome and Guadalajara). No slams and just one slam runner up. Not great.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
Both teams that go 3-0 in the RR stage in doubles lose in the SF's. Oh that's funny.

Melichar-Martinez/Perez v Siegemund/Zvonareva for the Year End Championships

Neither team won a slam or a Masters at all this year but vying for the top prize to finish the year...
 

zvelf

Hall of Fame
women can play 5 sets!
But agree in fairness it is correct choice to suspend on Monday.

Anyway, they should rethink to only play on indoor now. I think the decision in Cancun is because of how successful Guadalajara was.
Yes, women can definitely play 5 sets. I think slam finals and the WTA Finals final should all be best-of-5. I really enjoyed the 1990 WTA Championships final where Monica Seles beat Gabriela Sabatini in 5 sets. That said, my point wasn't that Swiatek and Sabalenka couldn't play 2 matches in the same day but rather it would be unfair to them to do so.

Meanwhile, Swiatek looks more focused tonight and is keeping the ball in play. Any long rally seems to lead to a Sabalenka miss. And Swiatek now has the first set along with a double break in the second.
 

ScottleeSV

Hall of Fame
Brilliant performance by Swiatek. This crap tournament could have a good ending now because Pegula is looking great at this event. She's already beaten Swiatek twice on hard courts year (?). Should be a great final really.

I wonder if Sabalenka is regretting not playing Guadalajara. It shouldn't have come to this.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
Pegula can accomplish a very rare feat by defeating the #1, #2 and #3 players in the world in the same tournament if she beats Swiatek in the final.

She already knocked off Sabalenka in the RR and Gauff in the SF.

It's only been done 5 times in history. Last person to do it was Krejcikova earlier this year in Dubai. Sabalenka did it at the WTA Finals last year, before then it wasn't since Venus in 2008 at the WTA Finals.

Players-to-defeat-Top-3-in-same-event.png
 

Connor35

Semi-Pro
Pegula can accomplish a very rare feat by defeating the #1, #2 and #3 players in the world in the same tournament if she beats Swiatek in the final.

She already knocked off Sabalenka in the RR and Gauff in the SF.

It's only been done 5 times in history. Last person to do it was Krejcikova earlier this year in Dubai. Sabalenka did it at the WTA Finals last year, before then it wasn't since Venus in 2008 at the WTA Finals.

Players-to-defeat-Top-3-in-same-event.png

She also beat #4 Rybakina.

She actually the first player since the rankings became in the 70s to play #1, #2, #3 and #4 in the same event.
She could become the first player ever to beat #1, #2, #3 and #4 in the same event.
 
Top