oserver
Professional
To be fair, you probably have an ingrained "normal continental/ebh grip serve", always hard to break a old "habit"
I'll go on a limb saying, that the efh grip serve must be hit below a certain racquet head speed kinda like training wheels on a bike... not recommended above certain speeds.
Slightly serious question to folks teaching... if a beginner comes to you and says, i want to learn a serve, which requires a minimal investment in time,... what do you teach them?
I'm torn between:
* underhand/sidespin serve (which is pretty effective even at the low 4.5 level)
* eastern fh grip - which allows a bit more spin than the western/frying pan serve - which IMO is effective, especially when placed consistently to the bh wing, up to the 4.0 level
The continental/ebh grip serve clearly has advantages if you want to get past a certain serving level (say 4.0), but for me, anway, has required ALOT of investment in time & practice.
Thoughts?
PS. I would only recommend the 360 spin if i didn't like the student... and i would definitely film
PPS. I lol, everytime I see the trashiest idea threads, always get the most attention (1344 comments and rising!)... kinda like junk food, or junk tv... it's like comforting to make myself feel better that someone knows less than me about <fill in topic>
Remember, the semi-western or full-western grip for forehand is a signature of modern tennis. In the good-old days, the continental or eastern forehand grip for forehand lasted a hundred years or more. The evolution of serves lagged behind forehand. That doesn't mean the dominate of continental serve grip will last forever. You guys cannot point out anything why eastern forehand or semi-western grip cannot produce good serves, just like the forehand shots. Our shoulder is very flexible to handle the low, middle and high shots, whether it is brushing the ball low to high or high to low.